Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a withdrawal and retreatment study (GO-BACK)

OBJECTIVES: The GO-BACK study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of golimumab (GLM) treatment withdrawal in adults with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) who demonstrate inactive disease during a 10-month open-label (OL) GLM run-in. METHODS: Eligible participants rece...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weinstein, Cindy L J, Sliwinska-Stanczyk, Paula, Hála, Tomas, Stanislav, Marina, Tzontcheva, Anjela, Yao, Ruji, Berd, Yuliya, Curtis, Sean P, Philip, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36919768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kead112
_version_ 1785132028275982336
author Weinstein, Cindy L J
Sliwinska-Stanczyk, Paula
Hála, Tomas
Stanislav, Marina
Tzontcheva, Anjela
Yao, Ruji
Berd, Yuliya
Curtis, Sean P
Philip, George
author_facet Weinstein, Cindy L J
Sliwinska-Stanczyk, Paula
Hála, Tomas
Stanislav, Marina
Tzontcheva, Anjela
Yao, Ruji
Berd, Yuliya
Curtis, Sean P
Philip, George
author_sort Weinstein, Cindy L J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The GO-BACK study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of golimumab (GLM) treatment withdrawal in adults with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) who demonstrate inactive disease during a 10-month open-label (OL) GLM run-in. METHODS: Eligible participants received OL GLM in period 1. In period 2, participants who achieved inactive disease were randomized 1:1:1 to receive double-blind (DB) treatment with monthly placebo (PBO, treatment withdrawal) or continued GLM treatment given monthly (GLM QMT) or every 2 months (GLM Q2MT). Participants who did not have a disease flare continued DB treatment for ∼12 months. Participants with a disease flare discontinued DB treatment and resumed monthly OL GLM. Primary endpoint compared the proportion of participants without a disease flare in the continued GLM treatment groups (QMT or Q2MT) vs PBO in a multiplicity-controlled, step-down fashion. Safety follow-up continued for ∼3 months after last treatment. RESULTS: A total of 188 patients, out of the 323 enrolled, were eligible for participation in period 2. Both GLM QMT and GLM Q2MT were superior to treatment withdrawal (PBO) in preventing disease flare (P < 0.001), with a treatment-difference vs PBO of 50.4% and 34.4% for the GLM QMT and GLM Q2MT groups, respectively. The time-to-first flare was significantly longer (log-rank P < 0.0001) with GLM treatment compared with PBO. Of 53 participants (in Q2MT or PBO) who had a confirmed disease flare, 51 (96.2%) attained a clinical response within 3 months of restarting OL GLM. Adverse events were consistent with the known GLM safety profile. CONCLUSION: Among participants with active nr-axSpA who attained inactive disease after 10 months of GLM treatment, continued GLM treatment is well tolerated and provides superior protection against disease flares compared with GLM withdrawal. (EudraCT: 2015-004020-65, registered on 30 March 2022; NCT: 03253796, registered on 18 August 2017.)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10629786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106297862023-11-08 Efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a withdrawal and retreatment study (GO-BACK) Weinstein, Cindy L J Sliwinska-Stanczyk, Paula Hála, Tomas Stanislav, Marina Tzontcheva, Anjela Yao, Ruji Berd, Yuliya Curtis, Sean P Philip, George Rheumatology (Oxford) Clinical Science OBJECTIVES: The GO-BACK study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of golimumab (GLM) treatment withdrawal in adults with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) who demonstrate inactive disease during a 10-month open-label (OL) GLM run-in. METHODS: Eligible participants received OL GLM in period 1. In period 2, participants who achieved inactive disease were randomized 1:1:1 to receive double-blind (DB) treatment with monthly placebo (PBO, treatment withdrawal) or continued GLM treatment given monthly (GLM QMT) or every 2 months (GLM Q2MT). Participants who did not have a disease flare continued DB treatment for ∼12 months. Participants with a disease flare discontinued DB treatment and resumed monthly OL GLM. Primary endpoint compared the proportion of participants without a disease flare in the continued GLM treatment groups (QMT or Q2MT) vs PBO in a multiplicity-controlled, step-down fashion. Safety follow-up continued for ∼3 months after last treatment. RESULTS: A total of 188 patients, out of the 323 enrolled, were eligible for participation in period 2. Both GLM QMT and GLM Q2MT were superior to treatment withdrawal (PBO) in preventing disease flare (P < 0.001), with a treatment-difference vs PBO of 50.4% and 34.4% for the GLM QMT and GLM Q2MT groups, respectively. The time-to-first flare was significantly longer (log-rank P < 0.0001) with GLM treatment compared with PBO. Of 53 participants (in Q2MT or PBO) who had a confirmed disease flare, 51 (96.2%) attained a clinical response within 3 months of restarting OL GLM. Adverse events were consistent with the known GLM safety profile. CONCLUSION: Among participants with active nr-axSpA who attained inactive disease after 10 months of GLM treatment, continued GLM treatment is well tolerated and provides superior protection against disease flares compared with GLM withdrawal. (EudraCT: 2015-004020-65, registered on 30 March 2022; NCT: 03253796, registered on 18 August 2017.) Oxford University Press 2023-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10629786/ /pubmed/36919768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kead112 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Science
Weinstein, Cindy L J
Sliwinska-Stanczyk, Paula
Hála, Tomas
Stanislav, Marina
Tzontcheva, Anjela
Yao, Ruji
Berd, Yuliya
Curtis, Sean P
Philip, George
Efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a withdrawal and retreatment study (GO-BACK)
title Efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a withdrawal and retreatment study (GO-BACK)
title_full Efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a withdrawal and retreatment study (GO-BACK)
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a withdrawal and retreatment study (GO-BACK)
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a withdrawal and retreatment study (GO-BACK)
title_short Efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a withdrawal and retreatment study (GO-BACK)
title_sort efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a withdrawal and retreatment study (go-back)
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36919768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kead112
work_keys_str_mv AT weinsteincindylj efficacyandsafetyofgolimumabinpatientswithnonradiographicaxialspondyloarthritisawithdrawalandretreatmentstudygoback
AT sliwinskastanczykpaula efficacyandsafetyofgolimumabinpatientswithnonradiographicaxialspondyloarthritisawithdrawalandretreatmentstudygoback
AT halatomas efficacyandsafetyofgolimumabinpatientswithnonradiographicaxialspondyloarthritisawithdrawalandretreatmentstudygoback
AT stanislavmarina efficacyandsafetyofgolimumabinpatientswithnonradiographicaxialspondyloarthritisawithdrawalandretreatmentstudygoback
AT tzontchevaanjela efficacyandsafetyofgolimumabinpatientswithnonradiographicaxialspondyloarthritisawithdrawalandretreatmentstudygoback
AT yaoruji efficacyandsafetyofgolimumabinpatientswithnonradiographicaxialspondyloarthritisawithdrawalandretreatmentstudygoback
AT berdyuliya efficacyandsafetyofgolimumabinpatientswithnonradiographicaxialspondyloarthritisawithdrawalandretreatmentstudygoback
AT curtisseanp efficacyandsafetyofgolimumabinpatientswithnonradiographicaxialspondyloarthritisawithdrawalandretreatmentstudygoback
AT philipgeorge efficacyandsafetyofgolimumabinpatientswithnonradiographicaxialspondyloarthritisawithdrawalandretreatmentstudygoback