Cargando…
Non‐additive effects between genotypes: Implications for competitive fitness assays
Competitive fitness assays are widely used in evolutionary biology and typically rely on a reference strain to compare different focal genotypes. This approach implicitly relies on the absence of interaction between the competing genotypes. In other words, the performance of the reference strain mus...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10630047/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37941737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10713 |
_version_ | 1785132070993920000 |
---|---|
author | Xiao, Changyi Duarri‐Redondo, Sara Thorhölludottir, Dagny A. V. Chen, Yiwen Schlötterer, Christian |
author_facet | Xiao, Changyi Duarri‐Redondo, Sara Thorhölludottir, Dagny A. V. Chen, Yiwen Schlötterer, Christian |
author_sort | Xiao, Changyi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Competitive fitness assays are widely used in evolutionary biology and typically rely on a reference strain to compare different focal genotypes. This approach implicitly relies on the absence of interaction between the competing genotypes. In other words, the performance of the reference strain must not depend on the competitor. This report scrutinized this assumption by competing diverged Drosophila simulans populations against a common reference strain. We detected strong evidence for interaction between the competing genotypes: (1) Frequency‐dependent selection was common with opposite effects in genetically diverged populations. (2) Temporal heterogeneity of fitness estimates, which can be partially attributed to a competitor‐specific delay in the eclosion of the reference strain. We propose that this inconsistent behavior of the reference strain can be considered a specific case of a genotype × environment interaction. Focal populations could modify the environment of the reference strain, either indirectly by altering the microbiome composition and food availability or directly by genotype‐specific cannibalism. Our results provide new insights into the interaction of diverged genotypes and have important implications for the interpretation of competitive fitness assays. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10630047 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106300472023-11-08 Non‐additive effects between genotypes: Implications for competitive fitness assays Xiao, Changyi Duarri‐Redondo, Sara Thorhölludottir, Dagny A. V. Chen, Yiwen Schlötterer, Christian Ecol Evol Research Articles Competitive fitness assays are widely used in evolutionary biology and typically rely on a reference strain to compare different focal genotypes. This approach implicitly relies on the absence of interaction between the competing genotypes. In other words, the performance of the reference strain must not depend on the competitor. This report scrutinized this assumption by competing diverged Drosophila simulans populations against a common reference strain. We detected strong evidence for interaction between the competing genotypes: (1) Frequency‐dependent selection was common with opposite effects in genetically diverged populations. (2) Temporal heterogeneity of fitness estimates, which can be partially attributed to a competitor‐specific delay in the eclosion of the reference strain. We propose that this inconsistent behavior of the reference strain can be considered a specific case of a genotype × environment interaction. Focal populations could modify the environment of the reference strain, either indirectly by altering the microbiome composition and food availability or directly by genotype‐specific cannibalism. Our results provide new insights into the interaction of diverged genotypes and have important implications for the interpretation of competitive fitness assays. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10630047/ /pubmed/37941737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10713 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Xiao, Changyi Duarri‐Redondo, Sara Thorhölludottir, Dagny A. V. Chen, Yiwen Schlötterer, Christian Non‐additive effects between genotypes: Implications for competitive fitness assays |
title | Non‐additive effects between genotypes: Implications for competitive fitness assays |
title_full | Non‐additive effects between genotypes: Implications for competitive fitness assays |
title_fullStr | Non‐additive effects between genotypes: Implications for competitive fitness assays |
title_full_unstemmed | Non‐additive effects between genotypes: Implications for competitive fitness assays |
title_short | Non‐additive effects between genotypes: Implications for competitive fitness assays |
title_sort | non‐additive effects between genotypes: implications for competitive fitness assays |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10630047/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37941737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10713 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiaochangyi nonadditiveeffectsbetweengenotypesimplicationsforcompetitivefitnessassays AT duarriredondosara nonadditiveeffectsbetweengenotypesimplicationsforcompetitivefitnessassays AT thorholludottirdagnyav nonadditiveeffectsbetweengenotypesimplicationsforcompetitivefitnessassays AT chenyiwen nonadditiveeffectsbetweengenotypesimplicationsforcompetitivefitnessassays AT schlottererchristian nonadditiveeffectsbetweengenotypesimplicationsforcompetitivefitnessassays |