Cargando…

Non‐additive effects between genotypes: Implications for competitive fitness assays

Competitive fitness assays are widely used in evolutionary biology and typically rely on a reference strain to compare different focal genotypes. This approach implicitly relies on the absence of interaction between the competing genotypes. In other words, the performance of the reference strain mus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiao, Changyi, Duarri‐Redondo, Sara, Thorhölludottir, Dagny A. V., Chen, Yiwen, Schlötterer, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10630047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37941737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10713
_version_ 1785132070993920000
author Xiao, Changyi
Duarri‐Redondo, Sara
Thorhölludottir, Dagny A. V.
Chen, Yiwen
Schlötterer, Christian
author_facet Xiao, Changyi
Duarri‐Redondo, Sara
Thorhölludottir, Dagny A. V.
Chen, Yiwen
Schlötterer, Christian
author_sort Xiao, Changyi
collection PubMed
description Competitive fitness assays are widely used in evolutionary biology and typically rely on a reference strain to compare different focal genotypes. This approach implicitly relies on the absence of interaction between the competing genotypes. In other words, the performance of the reference strain must not depend on the competitor. This report scrutinized this assumption by competing diverged Drosophila simulans populations against a common reference strain. We detected strong evidence for interaction between the competing genotypes: (1) Frequency‐dependent selection was common with opposite effects in genetically diverged populations. (2) Temporal heterogeneity of fitness estimates, which can be partially attributed to a competitor‐specific delay in the eclosion of the reference strain. We propose that this inconsistent behavior of the reference strain can be considered a specific case of a genotype × environment interaction. Focal populations could modify the environment of the reference strain, either indirectly by altering the microbiome composition and food availability or directly by genotype‐specific cannibalism. Our results provide new insights into the interaction of diverged genotypes and have important implications for the interpretation of competitive fitness assays.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10630047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106300472023-11-08 Non‐additive effects between genotypes: Implications for competitive fitness assays Xiao, Changyi Duarri‐Redondo, Sara Thorhölludottir, Dagny A. V. Chen, Yiwen Schlötterer, Christian Ecol Evol Research Articles Competitive fitness assays are widely used in evolutionary biology and typically rely on a reference strain to compare different focal genotypes. This approach implicitly relies on the absence of interaction between the competing genotypes. In other words, the performance of the reference strain must not depend on the competitor. This report scrutinized this assumption by competing diverged Drosophila simulans populations against a common reference strain. We detected strong evidence for interaction between the competing genotypes: (1) Frequency‐dependent selection was common with opposite effects in genetically diverged populations. (2) Temporal heterogeneity of fitness estimates, which can be partially attributed to a competitor‐specific delay in the eclosion of the reference strain. We propose that this inconsistent behavior of the reference strain can be considered a specific case of a genotype × environment interaction. Focal populations could modify the environment of the reference strain, either indirectly by altering the microbiome composition and food availability or directly by genotype‐specific cannibalism. Our results provide new insights into the interaction of diverged genotypes and have important implications for the interpretation of competitive fitness assays. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10630047/ /pubmed/37941737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10713 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Xiao, Changyi
Duarri‐Redondo, Sara
Thorhölludottir, Dagny A. V.
Chen, Yiwen
Schlötterer, Christian
Non‐additive effects between genotypes: Implications for competitive fitness assays
title Non‐additive effects between genotypes: Implications for competitive fitness assays
title_full Non‐additive effects between genotypes: Implications for competitive fitness assays
title_fullStr Non‐additive effects between genotypes: Implications for competitive fitness assays
title_full_unstemmed Non‐additive effects between genotypes: Implications for competitive fitness assays
title_short Non‐additive effects between genotypes: Implications for competitive fitness assays
title_sort non‐additive effects between genotypes: implications for competitive fitness assays
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10630047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37941737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10713
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaochangyi nonadditiveeffectsbetweengenotypesimplicationsforcompetitivefitnessassays
AT duarriredondosara nonadditiveeffectsbetweengenotypesimplicationsforcompetitivefitnessassays
AT thorholludottirdagnyav nonadditiveeffectsbetweengenotypesimplicationsforcompetitivefitnessassays
AT chenyiwen nonadditiveeffectsbetweengenotypesimplicationsforcompetitivefitnessassays
AT schlottererchristian nonadditiveeffectsbetweengenotypesimplicationsforcompetitivefitnessassays