Cargando…
Impacts of habitat connectivity on grassland arthropod metacommunity structure: A field‐based experimental test of theory
Metacommunity theory has advanced scientific understanding of how species interactions and spatial processes influence patterns of biodiversity and community structure across landscapes. While the central tenets of metacommunity theory have been promoted as pivotal considerations for conservation ma...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10630154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38020703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10686 |
_version_ | 1785132096200638464 |
---|---|
author | Bertellotti, Franklin Sommer, Nathalie R. Schmitz, Oswald J. McCary, Matthew A. |
author_facet | Bertellotti, Franklin Sommer, Nathalie R. Schmitz, Oswald J. McCary, Matthew A. |
author_sort | Bertellotti, Franklin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Metacommunity theory has advanced scientific understanding of how species interactions and spatial processes influence patterns of biodiversity and community structure across landscapes. While the central tenets of metacommunity theory have been promoted as pivotal considerations for conservation management, few field experiments have tested the validity of metacommunity predictions. Here, we tested one key prediction of metacommunity theory—that decreasing habitat connectivity should erode metacommunity structure by hindering species movement between patches. For 2 years, we manipulated an experimental old‐field grassland ecosystem via mowing to represent four levels of habitat connectivity: (1) open control, (2) full connectivity, (3) partial connectivity, and (4) no connectivity. Within each treatment plot (10 × 10 m, n = 4 replicates), we measured the abundance and diversity (i.e., alpha and beta) of both flying and ground arthropods using sticky and pitfall traps, respectively. We found that the abundance and diversity of highly mobile flying arthropods were unaffected by habitat connectivity, whereas less mobile ground arthropods were highly impacted. The mean total abundance of ground arthropods was 2.5× and 2× higher in the control and partially connected plots compared to isolated patches, respectively. We also reveal that habitat connectivity affected the trophic interactions of ground arthropods, with predators (e.g., wolf spiders, ground spiders) being highly positively correlated with micro‐detritivores (springtails, mites) but not macro‐detritivores (millipedes, isopods) as habitat connectivity increased. Together these findings indicate that changes in habitat connectivity can alter the metacommunity structure for less mobile organisms such as ground arthropods. Because of their essential roles in terrestrial ecosystem functioning and services, we recommend that conservationists, restoration practitioners, and land managers include principles of habitat connectivity for ground arthropods when designing biodiversity management programs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10630154 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106301542023-11-01 Impacts of habitat connectivity on grassland arthropod metacommunity structure: A field‐based experimental test of theory Bertellotti, Franklin Sommer, Nathalie R. Schmitz, Oswald J. McCary, Matthew A. Ecol Evol Research Articles Metacommunity theory has advanced scientific understanding of how species interactions and spatial processes influence patterns of biodiversity and community structure across landscapes. While the central tenets of metacommunity theory have been promoted as pivotal considerations for conservation management, few field experiments have tested the validity of metacommunity predictions. Here, we tested one key prediction of metacommunity theory—that decreasing habitat connectivity should erode metacommunity structure by hindering species movement between patches. For 2 years, we manipulated an experimental old‐field grassland ecosystem via mowing to represent four levels of habitat connectivity: (1) open control, (2) full connectivity, (3) partial connectivity, and (4) no connectivity. Within each treatment plot (10 × 10 m, n = 4 replicates), we measured the abundance and diversity (i.e., alpha and beta) of both flying and ground arthropods using sticky and pitfall traps, respectively. We found that the abundance and diversity of highly mobile flying arthropods were unaffected by habitat connectivity, whereas less mobile ground arthropods were highly impacted. The mean total abundance of ground arthropods was 2.5× and 2× higher in the control and partially connected plots compared to isolated patches, respectively. We also reveal that habitat connectivity affected the trophic interactions of ground arthropods, with predators (e.g., wolf spiders, ground spiders) being highly positively correlated with micro‐detritivores (springtails, mites) but not macro‐detritivores (millipedes, isopods) as habitat connectivity increased. Together these findings indicate that changes in habitat connectivity can alter the metacommunity structure for less mobile organisms such as ground arthropods. Because of their essential roles in terrestrial ecosystem functioning and services, we recommend that conservationists, restoration practitioners, and land managers include principles of habitat connectivity for ground arthropods when designing biodiversity management programs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10630154/ /pubmed/38020703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10686 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Bertellotti, Franklin Sommer, Nathalie R. Schmitz, Oswald J. McCary, Matthew A. Impacts of habitat connectivity on grassland arthropod metacommunity structure: A field‐based experimental test of theory |
title | Impacts of habitat connectivity on grassland arthropod metacommunity structure: A field‐based experimental test of theory |
title_full | Impacts of habitat connectivity on grassland arthropod metacommunity structure: A field‐based experimental test of theory |
title_fullStr | Impacts of habitat connectivity on grassland arthropod metacommunity structure: A field‐based experimental test of theory |
title_full_unstemmed | Impacts of habitat connectivity on grassland arthropod metacommunity structure: A field‐based experimental test of theory |
title_short | Impacts of habitat connectivity on grassland arthropod metacommunity structure: A field‐based experimental test of theory |
title_sort | impacts of habitat connectivity on grassland arthropod metacommunity structure: a field‐based experimental test of theory |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10630154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38020703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10686 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bertellottifranklin impactsofhabitatconnectivityongrasslandarthropodmetacommunitystructureafieldbasedexperimentaltestoftheory AT sommernathalier impactsofhabitatconnectivityongrasslandarthropodmetacommunitystructureafieldbasedexperimentaltestoftheory AT schmitzoswaldj impactsofhabitatconnectivityongrasslandarthropodmetacommunitystructureafieldbasedexperimentaltestoftheory AT mccarymatthewa impactsofhabitatconnectivityongrasslandarthropodmetacommunitystructureafieldbasedexperimentaltestoftheory |