Cargando…
Minimal detectable change in inertial measurement unit-based trunk acceleration indices during gait in inpatients with subacute stroke
Gait analysis using inertial measurement units (IMU) provides a multifaceted assessment of gait characteristics, but minimal detectable changes (MDC), the true change beyond measurement error, during gait in patients hospitalized with subacute stroke has not been clarified. This study aimed to deter...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10630455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37935767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46725-5 |
Sumario: | Gait analysis using inertial measurement units (IMU) provides a multifaceted assessment of gait characteristics, but minimal detectable changes (MDC), the true change beyond measurement error, during gait in patients hospitalized with subacute stroke has not been clarified. This study aimed to determine the MDC in IMU-based trunk acceleration indices during gait in patients hospitalized with subacute stroke. Nineteen patients with subacute stroke (mean ± SD, 75.4 ± 10.9 years; 13 males) who could understand instructions, had a pre-morbid modified Rankin Scale < 3 and could walk straight for 16 m under supervision were included. As trunk acceleration indices, Stride regularity, harmonic ratio (HR), and normalized root mean square (RMS) during gait were calculated on three axes: mediolateral (ML), vertical (VT), and anterior–posterior (AP). MDC was calculated from two measurements taken on the same day according to the following formula: MDC = standard error of measurement × 1.96 × 2. The MDCs for each trunk acceleration index were, in order of ML, VT, and AP: 0.175, 0.179, and 0.149 for stride regularity; 0.666, 0.741, and 0.864 for HR; 4.511, 2.288, and 2.680 for normalized RMS. This finding helps determine the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions in the gait assessment of patients with stroke. |
---|