Cargando…
Machine learning approaches to study the structure-activity relationships of LpxC inhibitors
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as one of the global threats to human health in the 21st century. Drug discovery of inhibitors against novel targets rather than conventional bacterial targets has been considered an inevitable strategy for the growing threat of AMR infections. In this stud...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10630528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38023567 http://dx.doi.org/10.17179/excli2023-6356 |
_version_ | 1785132168445427712 |
---|---|
author | Yu, Tianshi Chong, Li Chuin Nantasenamat, Chanin Anuwongcharoen, Nuttapat Piacham, Theeraphon |
author_facet | Yu, Tianshi Chong, Li Chuin Nantasenamat, Chanin Anuwongcharoen, Nuttapat Piacham, Theeraphon |
author_sort | Yu, Tianshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as one of the global threats to human health in the 21st century. Drug discovery of inhibitors against novel targets rather than conventional bacterial targets has been considered an inevitable strategy for the growing threat of AMR infections. In this study, we applied quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling to the LpxC inhibitors to predict the inhibitory activity. In addition, we performed various cheminformatics analysis consisting of the exploration of the chemical space, identification of chemotypes, performing structure-activity landscape and activity cliffs as well as construction of the Structure-Activity Similarity (SAS) map. We built a total of 24 QSAR classification models using PubChem and MACCS fingerprint with 12 various machine learning algorithms. The best model with PubChem fingerprint is the Extremely Gradient Boost model (accuracy on the training set: 0.937; accuracy on the 10-fold cross-validation set: 0.795; accuracy on the test set: 0.799). Furthermore, it was found that the best model using the MACCS fingerprint was the Random Forest model (accuracy on the training set: 0.955; accuracy on the 10-fold cross-validation set: 0.803; accuracy on the test set: 0.785). In addition, we have identified eight consensus activity cliff generators that are highly informative for further SAR investigations. It is hoped that findings presented herein can provide guidance for further lead optimization of LpxC inhibitors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10630528 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106305282023-09-05 Machine learning approaches to study the structure-activity relationships of LpxC inhibitors Yu, Tianshi Chong, Li Chuin Nantasenamat, Chanin Anuwongcharoen, Nuttapat Piacham, Theeraphon EXCLI J Original Article Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as one of the global threats to human health in the 21st century. Drug discovery of inhibitors against novel targets rather than conventional bacterial targets has been considered an inevitable strategy for the growing threat of AMR infections. In this study, we applied quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling to the LpxC inhibitors to predict the inhibitory activity. In addition, we performed various cheminformatics analysis consisting of the exploration of the chemical space, identification of chemotypes, performing structure-activity landscape and activity cliffs as well as construction of the Structure-Activity Similarity (SAS) map. We built a total of 24 QSAR classification models using PubChem and MACCS fingerprint with 12 various machine learning algorithms. The best model with PubChem fingerprint is the Extremely Gradient Boost model (accuracy on the training set: 0.937; accuracy on the 10-fold cross-validation set: 0.795; accuracy on the test set: 0.799). Furthermore, it was found that the best model using the MACCS fingerprint was the Random Forest model (accuracy on the training set: 0.955; accuracy on the 10-fold cross-validation set: 0.803; accuracy on the test set: 0.785). In addition, we have identified eight consensus activity cliff generators that are highly informative for further SAR investigations. It is hoped that findings presented herein can provide guidance for further lead optimization of LpxC inhibitors. Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors 2023-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10630528/ /pubmed/38023567 http://dx.doi.org/10.17179/excli2023-6356 Text en Copyright © 2023 Yu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ) You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yu, Tianshi Chong, Li Chuin Nantasenamat, Chanin Anuwongcharoen, Nuttapat Piacham, Theeraphon Machine learning approaches to study the structure-activity relationships of LpxC inhibitors |
title | Machine learning approaches to study the structure-activity relationships of LpxC inhibitors |
title_full | Machine learning approaches to study the structure-activity relationships of LpxC inhibitors |
title_fullStr | Machine learning approaches to study the structure-activity relationships of LpxC inhibitors |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine learning approaches to study the structure-activity relationships of LpxC inhibitors |
title_short | Machine learning approaches to study the structure-activity relationships of LpxC inhibitors |
title_sort | machine learning approaches to study the structure-activity relationships of lpxc inhibitors |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10630528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38023567 http://dx.doi.org/10.17179/excli2023-6356 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yutianshi machinelearningapproachestostudythestructureactivityrelationshipsoflpxcinhibitors AT chonglichuin machinelearningapproachestostudythestructureactivityrelationshipsoflpxcinhibitors AT nantasenamatchanin machinelearningapproachestostudythestructureactivityrelationshipsoflpxcinhibitors AT anuwongcharoennuttapat machinelearningapproachestostudythestructureactivityrelationshipsoflpxcinhibitors AT piachamtheeraphon machinelearningapproachestostudythestructureactivityrelationshipsoflpxcinhibitors |