Cargando…

Machine learning approaches to study the structure-activity relationships of LpxC inhibitors

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as one of the global threats to human health in the 21st century. Drug discovery of inhibitors against novel targets rather than conventional bacterial targets has been considered an inevitable strategy for the growing threat of AMR infections. In this stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Tianshi, Chong, Li Chuin, Nantasenamat, Chanin, Anuwongcharoen, Nuttapat, Piacham, Theeraphon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10630528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38023567
http://dx.doi.org/10.17179/excli2023-6356
_version_ 1785132168445427712
author Yu, Tianshi
Chong, Li Chuin
Nantasenamat, Chanin
Anuwongcharoen, Nuttapat
Piacham, Theeraphon
author_facet Yu, Tianshi
Chong, Li Chuin
Nantasenamat, Chanin
Anuwongcharoen, Nuttapat
Piacham, Theeraphon
author_sort Yu, Tianshi
collection PubMed
description Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as one of the global threats to human health in the 21st century. Drug discovery of inhibitors against novel targets rather than conventional bacterial targets has been considered an inevitable strategy for the growing threat of AMR infections. In this study, we applied quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling to the LpxC inhibitors to predict the inhibitory activity. In addition, we performed various cheminformatics analysis consisting of the exploration of the chemical space, identification of chemotypes, performing structure-activity landscape and activity cliffs as well as construction of the Structure-Activity Similarity (SAS) map. We built a total of 24 QSAR classification models using PubChem and MACCS fingerprint with 12 various machine learning algorithms. The best model with PubChem fingerprint is the Extremely Gradient Boost model (accuracy on the training set: 0.937; accuracy on the 10-fold cross-validation set: 0.795; accuracy on the test set: 0.799). Furthermore, it was found that the best model using the MACCS fingerprint was the Random Forest model (accuracy on the training set: 0.955; accuracy on the 10-fold cross-validation set: 0.803; accuracy on the test set: 0.785). In addition, we have identified eight consensus activity cliff generators that are highly informative for further SAR investigations. It is hoped that findings presented herein can provide guidance for further lead optimization of LpxC inhibitors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10630528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106305282023-09-05 Machine learning approaches to study the structure-activity relationships of LpxC inhibitors Yu, Tianshi Chong, Li Chuin Nantasenamat, Chanin Anuwongcharoen, Nuttapat Piacham, Theeraphon EXCLI J Original Article Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as one of the global threats to human health in the 21st century. Drug discovery of inhibitors against novel targets rather than conventional bacterial targets has been considered an inevitable strategy for the growing threat of AMR infections. In this study, we applied quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling to the LpxC inhibitors to predict the inhibitory activity. In addition, we performed various cheminformatics analysis consisting of the exploration of the chemical space, identification of chemotypes, performing structure-activity landscape and activity cliffs as well as construction of the Structure-Activity Similarity (SAS) map. We built a total of 24 QSAR classification models using PubChem and MACCS fingerprint with 12 various machine learning algorithms. The best model with PubChem fingerprint is the Extremely Gradient Boost model (accuracy on the training set: 0.937; accuracy on the 10-fold cross-validation set: 0.795; accuracy on the test set: 0.799). Furthermore, it was found that the best model using the MACCS fingerprint was the Random Forest model (accuracy on the training set: 0.955; accuracy on the 10-fold cross-validation set: 0.803; accuracy on the test set: 0.785). In addition, we have identified eight consensus activity cliff generators that are highly informative for further SAR investigations. It is hoped that findings presented herein can provide guidance for further lead optimization of LpxC inhibitors. Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors 2023-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10630528/ /pubmed/38023567 http://dx.doi.org/10.17179/excli2023-6356 Text en Copyright © 2023 Yu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ) You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yu, Tianshi
Chong, Li Chuin
Nantasenamat, Chanin
Anuwongcharoen, Nuttapat
Piacham, Theeraphon
Machine learning approaches to study the structure-activity relationships of LpxC inhibitors
title Machine learning approaches to study the structure-activity relationships of LpxC inhibitors
title_full Machine learning approaches to study the structure-activity relationships of LpxC inhibitors
title_fullStr Machine learning approaches to study the structure-activity relationships of LpxC inhibitors
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning approaches to study the structure-activity relationships of LpxC inhibitors
title_short Machine learning approaches to study the structure-activity relationships of LpxC inhibitors
title_sort machine learning approaches to study the structure-activity relationships of lpxc inhibitors
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10630528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38023567
http://dx.doi.org/10.17179/excli2023-6356
work_keys_str_mv AT yutianshi machinelearningapproachestostudythestructureactivityrelationshipsoflpxcinhibitors
AT chonglichuin machinelearningapproachestostudythestructureactivityrelationshipsoflpxcinhibitors
AT nantasenamatchanin machinelearningapproachestostudythestructureactivityrelationshipsoflpxcinhibitors
AT anuwongcharoennuttapat machinelearningapproachestostudythestructureactivityrelationshipsoflpxcinhibitors
AT piachamtheeraphon machinelearningapproachestostudythestructureactivityrelationshipsoflpxcinhibitors