Cargando…

Super pulsed thulium fiber laser outcomes in retrograde intrarenal surgery for ureteral and renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Laser lithotripsy using a thulium fiber laser (TFL) has become an effective treatment option for small renal stones with low complication rates. TFL has a higher absorption coefficient, smaller fibers, and better pulse rate capability. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almasoud, Nazal A., Safar, Omar, Elatreisy, Adel, Alshahrani, Saad Thamer, Libdah, Saud Bin, Alkhaldi, Sulaiman M., Alsoliman, Nezar F., Alderaan, Abdulrahman M., Abdel-Al, Ibrahim, Abouelgreed, Tamer A., Alabeedi, Mohammed, Al-Aown, Abdulrahman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10631031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37936133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01355-x
_version_ 1785132281639206912
author Almasoud, Nazal A.
Safar, Omar
Elatreisy, Adel
Alshahrani, Saad Thamer
Libdah, Saud Bin
Alkhaldi, Sulaiman M.
Alsoliman, Nezar F.
Alderaan, Abdulrahman M.
Abdel-Al, Ibrahim
Abouelgreed, Tamer A.
Alabeedi, Mohammed
Al-Aown, Abdulrahman
author_facet Almasoud, Nazal A.
Safar, Omar
Elatreisy, Adel
Alshahrani, Saad Thamer
Libdah, Saud Bin
Alkhaldi, Sulaiman M.
Alsoliman, Nezar F.
Alderaan, Abdulrahman M.
Abdel-Al, Ibrahim
Abouelgreed, Tamer A.
Alabeedi, Mohammed
Al-Aown, Abdulrahman
author_sort Almasoud, Nazal A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laser lithotripsy using a thulium fiber laser (TFL) has become an effective treatment option for small renal stones with low complication rates. TFL has a higher absorption coefficient, smaller fibers, and better pulse rate capability. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the published evidence regarding TFL's lithotripsy performance in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), for which we primarily assessed the outcomes of stone-free rate, operation time, and complications. We searched different databases from inception to April 2023. We assessed the methodological quality and risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized trials and the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies. We used a random-effects model for meta-analysis and assessed heterogeneity using the I2 statistic. RESULTS: Twelve published studies evaluated the efficacy of RIRS using a TFL for treating renal and ureteral stones. The meta-analysis revealed a predicted stone-free rate of 89.37% (95% CI: 83.93% to 93.12%), indicating that, on average, approximately 89.37% of patients achieved a stone-free state after treatment. The substantial heterogeneity among the studies was evident, as shown by a Q-value of 33.1174 and a p-value of 0.0003. The I(2) value of 69.80% (95% CI: 25.91% to 92.02%) highlighted the proportion of variability attributed to genuine heterogeneity across the studies. Moreover, the H(2) value 3.31 (95% CI: 1.35 to 12.53) indicated significant heterogeneity beyond random chance. The estimated overall effect size (logit-transformed) of 2.1289 was highly statistically significant (z = 8.7648, p < 0.0001) with a confidence interval of 1.6528 to 2.6049. The reported complications varied across studies, encompassing Clavien grade I–II complications in most cases, with a subset experiencing more severe Clavien grade III–V complications. Additionally, other studies noted a range of complications, such as haematuria, fever, transient creatinine elevation, and postoperative issues like bleeding, pain, and sepsis. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that RIRS using TFL is an effective and safe treatment option for renal and ureteral stones, with high stone-free and low complication rates. The included studies exhibited a low risk of bias and were of high quality. However, more extensive randomized controlled trials with extended follow-up periods are needed to investigate this technique's efficacy and safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10631031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106310312023-11-07 Super pulsed thulium fiber laser outcomes in retrograde intrarenal surgery for ureteral and renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis Almasoud, Nazal A. Safar, Omar Elatreisy, Adel Alshahrani, Saad Thamer Libdah, Saud Bin Alkhaldi, Sulaiman M. Alsoliman, Nezar F. Alderaan, Abdulrahman M. Abdel-Al, Ibrahim Abouelgreed, Tamer A. Alabeedi, Mohammed Al-Aown, Abdulrahman BMC Urol Research BACKGROUND: Laser lithotripsy using a thulium fiber laser (TFL) has become an effective treatment option for small renal stones with low complication rates. TFL has a higher absorption coefficient, smaller fibers, and better pulse rate capability. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the published evidence regarding TFL's lithotripsy performance in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), for which we primarily assessed the outcomes of stone-free rate, operation time, and complications. We searched different databases from inception to April 2023. We assessed the methodological quality and risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized trials and the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies. We used a random-effects model for meta-analysis and assessed heterogeneity using the I2 statistic. RESULTS: Twelve published studies evaluated the efficacy of RIRS using a TFL for treating renal and ureteral stones. The meta-analysis revealed a predicted stone-free rate of 89.37% (95% CI: 83.93% to 93.12%), indicating that, on average, approximately 89.37% of patients achieved a stone-free state after treatment. The substantial heterogeneity among the studies was evident, as shown by a Q-value of 33.1174 and a p-value of 0.0003. The I(2) value of 69.80% (95% CI: 25.91% to 92.02%) highlighted the proportion of variability attributed to genuine heterogeneity across the studies. Moreover, the H(2) value 3.31 (95% CI: 1.35 to 12.53) indicated significant heterogeneity beyond random chance. The estimated overall effect size (logit-transformed) of 2.1289 was highly statistically significant (z = 8.7648, p < 0.0001) with a confidence interval of 1.6528 to 2.6049. The reported complications varied across studies, encompassing Clavien grade I–II complications in most cases, with a subset experiencing more severe Clavien grade III–V complications. Additionally, other studies noted a range of complications, such as haematuria, fever, transient creatinine elevation, and postoperative issues like bleeding, pain, and sepsis. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that RIRS using TFL is an effective and safe treatment option for renal and ureteral stones, with high stone-free and low complication rates. The included studies exhibited a low risk of bias and were of high quality. However, more extensive randomized controlled trials with extended follow-up periods are needed to investigate this technique's efficacy and safety. BioMed Central 2023-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10631031/ /pubmed/37936133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01355-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Almasoud, Nazal A.
Safar, Omar
Elatreisy, Adel
Alshahrani, Saad Thamer
Libdah, Saud Bin
Alkhaldi, Sulaiman M.
Alsoliman, Nezar F.
Alderaan, Abdulrahman M.
Abdel-Al, Ibrahim
Abouelgreed, Tamer A.
Alabeedi, Mohammed
Al-Aown, Abdulrahman
Super pulsed thulium fiber laser outcomes in retrograde intrarenal surgery for ureteral and renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Super pulsed thulium fiber laser outcomes in retrograde intrarenal surgery for ureteral and renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Super pulsed thulium fiber laser outcomes in retrograde intrarenal surgery for ureteral and renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Super pulsed thulium fiber laser outcomes in retrograde intrarenal surgery for ureteral and renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Super pulsed thulium fiber laser outcomes in retrograde intrarenal surgery for ureteral and renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Super pulsed thulium fiber laser outcomes in retrograde intrarenal surgery for ureteral and renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort super pulsed thulium fiber laser outcomes in retrograde intrarenal surgery for ureteral and renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10631031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37936133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01355-x
work_keys_str_mv AT almasoudnazala superpulsedthuliumfiberlaseroutcomesinretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforureteralandrenalstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT safaromar superpulsedthuliumfiberlaseroutcomesinretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforureteralandrenalstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT elatreisyadel superpulsedthuliumfiberlaseroutcomesinretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforureteralandrenalstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alshahranisaadthamer superpulsedthuliumfiberlaseroutcomesinretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforureteralandrenalstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT libdahsaudbin superpulsedthuliumfiberlaseroutcomesinretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforureteralandrenalstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alkhaldisulaimanm superpulsedthuliumfiberlaseroutcomesinretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforureteralandrenalstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alsolimannezarf superpulsedthuliumfiberlaseroutcomesinretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforureteralandrenalstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alderaanabdulrahmanm superpulsedthuliumfiberlaseroutcomesinretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforureteralandrenalstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT abdelalibrahim superpulsedthuliumfiberlaseroutcomesinretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforureteralandrenalstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT abouelgreedtamera superpulsedthuliumfiberlaseroutcomesinretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforureteralandrenalstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alabeedimohammed superpulsedthuliumfiberlaseroutcomesinretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforureteralandrenalstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT alaownabdulrahman superpulsedthuliumfiberlaseroutcomesinretrogradeintrarenalsurgeryforureteralandrenalstonesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis