Cargando…

Factor structure of the Oxford Shoulder Score: secondary analyses of the UK FROST and PROFHER trial populations

AIMS: Frozen shoulder and proximal humeral fracture can cause pain, stiffness and loss of function. The impact of these symptoms on patients can be measured using the comprehensively validated, 12-item Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). Evidence suggests that pain and function may have a differential impa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simpson, J., Keding, A., Spencer, S., Brealey, S., Rangan, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10631035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37940977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04319-x
_version_ 1785132282617528320
author Simpson, J.
Keding, A.
Spencer, S.
Brealey, S.
Rangan, A.
author_facet Simpson, J.
Keding, A.
Spencer, S.
Brealey, S.
Rangan, A.
author_sort Simpson, J.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Frozen shoulder and proximal humeral fracture can cause pain, stiffness and loss of function. The impact of these symptoms on patients can be measured using the comprehensively validated, 12-item Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). Evidence suggests that pain and function may have a differential impact on patients’ experience of shoulder conditions, and this may be important for clinical management. We therefore explored the factor structure of the OSS within the UK FROST and PROFHER trial populations. METHODS: We performed exploratory factor analysis (EFA), followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), on baseline UK FROST data from 490 of the 503 trial participants. Data at 6 months post-randomisation were used for 228 of the 250 participants for the PROFHER trial. RESULTS: UK FROST factor extraction results, using Velicer's Minimum Average Partial and Horn's Parallel Analysis tests, suggested a unifactorial solution, but two factors were weakly indicated by the less reliable ‘Kaiser’s eigenvalue > 1’ and scree tests. We explored this further using EFA. Eight items (2 to 7, 9 and 10) loaded onto a ‘Function’ factor, three on a ‘Pain’ factor (1, 8 and 12) and item 11 cross-loaded. However, one- and two-factor models were rejected in CFA. Factor extraction of PROFHER data at 6 months demonstrated a single first-order factor solution, which was also subsequently rejected in CFA. CONCLUSION: Insufficient evidence was found, within the constraints of the data available, to support the use of ‘Pain’ and ‘Function’ sub-scales of the OSS in either patient population. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-023-04319-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10631035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106310352023-11-08 Factor structure of the Oxford Shoulder Score: secondary analyses of the UK FROST and PROFHER trial populations Simpson, J. Keding, A. Spencer, S. Brealey, S. Rangan, A. J Orthop Surg Res Research Article AIMS: Frozen shoulder and proximal humeral fracture can cause pain, stiffness and loss of function. The impact of these symptoms on patients can be measured using the comprehensively validated, 12-item Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). Evidence suggests that pain and function may have a differential impact on patients’ experience of shoulder conditions, and this may be important for clinical management. We therefore explored the factor structure of the OSS within the UK FROST and PROFHER trial populations. METHODS: We performed exploratory factor analysis (EFA), followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), on baseline UK FROST data from 490 of the 503 trial participants. Data at 6 months post-randomisation were used for 228 of the 250 participants for the PROFHER trial. RESULTS: UK FROST factor extraction results, using Velicer's Minimum Average Partial and Horn's Parallel Analysis tests, suggested a unifactorial solution, but two factors were weakly indicated by the less reliable ‘Kaiser’s eigenvalue > 1’ and scree tests. We explored this further using EFA. Eight items (2 to 7, 9 and 10) loaded onto a ‘Function’ factor, three on a ‘Pain’ factor (1, 8 and 12) and item 11 cross-loaded. However, one- and two-factor models were rejected in CFA. Factor extraction of PROFHER data at 6 months demonstrated a single first-order factor solution, which was also subsequently rejected in CFA. CONCLUSION: Insufficient evidence was found, within the constraints of the data available, to support the use of ‘Pain’ and ‘Function’ sub-scales of the OSS in either patient population. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-023-04319-x. BioMed Central 2023-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10631035/ /pubmed/37940977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04319-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Simpson, J.
Keding, A.
Spencer, S.
Brealey, S.
Rangan, A.
Factor structure of the Oxford Shoulder Score: secondary analyses of the UK FROST and PROFHER trial populations
title Factor structure of the Oxford Shoulder Score: secondary analyses of the UK FROST and PROFHER trial populations
title_full Factor structure of the Oxford Shoulder Score: secondary analyses of the UK FROST and PROFHER trial populations
title_fullStr Factor structure of the Oxford Shoulder Score: secondary analyses of the UK FROST and PROFHER trial populations
title_full_unstemmed Factor structure of the Oxford Shoulder Score: secondary analyses of the UK FROST and PROFHER trial populations
title_short Factor structure of the Oxford Shoulder Score: secondary analyses of the UK FROST and PROFHER trial populations
title_sort factor structure of the oxford shoulder score: secondary analyses of the uk frost and profher trial populations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10631035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37940977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04319-x
work_keys_str_mv AT simpsonj factorstructureoftheoxfordshoulderscoresecondaryanalysesoftheukfrostandprofhertrialpopulations
AT kedinga factorstructureoftheoxfordshoulderscoresecondaryanalysesoftheukfrostandprofhertrialpopulations
AT spencers factorstructureoftheoxfordshoulderscoresecondaryanalysesoftheukfrostandprofhertrialpopulations
AT brealeys factorstructureoftheoxfordshoulderscoresecondaryanalysesoftheukfrostandprofhertrialpopulations
AT rangana factorstructureoftheoxfordshoulderscoresecondaryanalysesoftheukfrostandprofhertrialpopulations