Minimally invasive lateral plating for diaphyseal fractures with extension into the proximal humerus and its implications for the deltoid muscle and its distal insertion: functional analysis and MR-imaging

BACKGROUND: In minimally invasive lateral plate osteosynthesis of the humerus (MILPOH) the plate is introduced through a deltoid split proximally and advanced through the central portion of the deltoid insertion and between bone and brachial muscle to the distal aspect of the humerus. The fracture is then indirectly reduced and bridged by the plate. Whereas it has been shown that the strong anterior and posterior parts of the distal deltoid insertion remain intact with this maneuver, its impact on deltoid muscle strength and muscular morphology remains unclear. It was the aim of this study to evaluate deltoid muscle function and MR-morphology of the deltoid muscle and its distal insertion after MILPOH. METHODS: Six patients (median age 63 years, range 52–69 years, f/m 5/1) who had undergone MILPOH for diaphyseal humeral fractures extending into the proximal metaphysis and head (AO 12B/C(i)) between 08/2017 and 08/2020 were included. Functional testing was performed for the injured and uninjured extremity including strength measurements for 30/60/90° shoulder abduction and flexion at least one year postoperatively. Constant-Murley-Score (CMS) including an age-and gender-adjusted version, were obtained and compared to the uninjured side. Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire were acquired for the affected extremity. Quality of life was measured using the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ-5D-5 L VAS). MR imaging was performed for both shoulders accordingly at the time of follow-up to assess the integrity of the distal insertion, muscle mass and fatty degeneration of the deltoid muscle. Muscle mass was determined by measuring the area of the deltoid muscle on the axial MR image at the height of the center of the humeral head. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 29 months (range 12–48 months). Median difference of abduction strength after MILPOH was + 13% for 30°, 0% for 60° and − 22% for 90°. For flexion, the difference to the uninjured side was measured 5% for 30°, -7% for 60° and − 12% for 90°. Median CMS was 75 (66–82) for the operated extremity compared to 82 (77–90) for the uninjured side. Age- and gender-adapted CMS was calculated 88 (79–99) vs. 96 (89–107). Median OSS was 47 (40–48). DASH was 26 (15–36). EQ-5D-5 L VAS ranged from 81 to 95 with a median of 90. The median difference of the deltoid muscle area on MRI was 2% (-21% to + 53%) compared to the uninjured side. No fatty degeneration of the deltoid muscle was observed. The weaker central part of the distal deltoid insertion was exclusively perforated by the plate, leaving the strong anterior and posterior parts of the insertion intact in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: MILPOH was associated with good functional and subjective outcome. Minor impairment of abduction strength was observed with increasing abduction angles. The reason for this impairment is unclear since MILPOH did not affect the structural quality of the deltoid muscle and the integrity of the strong anterior and posterior parts of its insertion remained intact. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 26/05/2023: ISRCTN51786146.