Cargando…

Measurement and documentation of quality indicators for the end-of-life care of hospital patients a nationwide retrospective record review study

BACKGROUND: Quality of care at the end of life in hospitals is often perceived to be lower compared to the care that is provided to people who die in their own home. Documenting and measuring indicators of common end-of-life symptoms could help improve end-of-life care in hospitals. This study provi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bijnsdorp, F. M., Schouten, B., Reyners, A. K. L., Wagner, C., Francke, A. L., van Schoten, S. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10631072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37936121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01299-x
_version_ 1785132291822977024
author Bijnsdorp, F. M.
Schouten, B.
Reyners, A. K. L.
Wagner, C.
Francke, A. L.
van Schoten, S. M.
author_facet Bijnsdorp, F. M.
Schouten, B.
Reyners, A. K. L.
Wagner, C.
Francke, A. L.
van Schoten, S. M.
author_sort Bijnsdorp, F. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quality of care at the end of life in hospitals is often perceived to be lower compared to the care that is provided to people who die in their own home. Documenting and measuring indicators of common end-of-life symptoms could help improve end-of-life care in hospitals. This study provided insight into quality indicators for the end-of-life care of patients who died in a Dutch hospital, and assessed differences between deceased patients who were admitted for palliative/terminal care versus patients admitted for other reasons. METHODS: In a retrospective record review study, trained nurses reviewed electronic health records (EHRs) of patients who died in 2019 (n = 2998), in a stratified sample of 20 Dutch hospitals. The nurses registered whether data was found in de EHRs about quality indicators for end-of-life care. This concerned: symptoms (pain, shortness of breath, anxiety, depressive symptoms), spiritual and psychological support and advance care planning. Multilevel regression analyses were performed to assess differences between patients who had been admitted for palliative/terminal care and patients admitted for other reasons. RESULTS: Common end-of-life symptoms were rarely measured using a standardized method (e.g. Numeric Rating Scale, Visual Analogue Scale or Utrecht Symptom Diary). The symptom burden of pain was measured using a standardized method more often (63.3%) than the symptom burden of shortness of breath (2.2%), anxiety (0.5%) and depressive symptoms (0.3%). Similarly, little information was documented in the EHRs regarding wish to involve a spiritual counsellor, psychologist or social worker. Life expectancy was documented in 66%. The preferred place of death was documented less often (20%). The documentation of some quality indicators differed between patients who were admitted for palliative/terminal care compared to other patients. CONCLUSION: Except for the burden of pain, symptoms are rarely measured with standardized methods in patients who died in Dutch Hospitals. This study underlines the importance of documenting information about symptom burden and aspects related to advance care planning, and spiritual and psychological support to improve the quality of end-of-life care for patients in hospitals. Furthermore, uniformity in measuring methods improves the possibility to compare results between patient groups and settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-023-01299-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10631072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106310722023-11-07 Measurement and documentation of quality indicators for the end-of-life care of hospital patients a nationwide retrospective record review study Bijnsdorp, F. M. Schouten, B. Reyners, A. K. L. Wagner, C. Francke, A. L. van Schoten, S. M. BMC Palliat Care Research BACKGROUND: Quality of care at the end of life in hospitals is often perceived to be lower compared to the care that is provided to people who die in their own home. Documenting and measuring indicators of common end-of-life symptoms could help improve end-of-life care in hospitals. This study provided insight into quality indicators for the end-of-life care of patients who died in a Dutch hospital, and assessed differences between deceased patients who were admitted for palliative/terminal care versus patients admitted for other reasons. METHODS: In a retrospective record review study, trained nurses reviewed electronic health records (EHRs) of patients who died in 2019 (n = 2998), in a stratified sample of 20 Dutch hospitals. The nurses registered whether data was found in de EHRs about quality indicators for end-of-life care. This concerned: symptoms (pain, shortness of breath, anxiety, depressive symptoms), spiritual and psychological support and advance care planning. Multilevel regression analyses were performed to assess differences between patients who had been admitted for palliative/terminal care and patients admitted for other reasons. RESULTS: Common end-of-life symptoms were rarely measured using a standardized method (e.g. Numeric Rating Scale, Visual Analogue Scale or Utrecht Symptom Diary). The symptom burden of pain was measured using a standardized method more often (63.3%) than the symptom burden of shortness of breath (2.2%), anxiety (0.5%) and depressive symptoms (0.3%). Similarly, little information was documented in the EHRs regarding wish to involve a spiritual counsellor, psychologist or social worker. Life expectancy was documented in 66%. The preferred place of death was documented less often (20%). The documentation of some quality indicators differed between patients who were admitted for palliative/terminal care compared to other patients. CONCLUSION: Except for the burden of pain, symptoms are rarely measured with standardized methods in patients who died in Dutch Hospitals. This study underlines the importance of documenting information about symptom burden and aspects related to advance care planning, and spiritual and psychological support to improve the quality of end-of-life care for patients in hospitals. Furthermore, uniformity in measuring methods improves the possibility to compare results between patient groups and settings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-023-01299-x. BioMed Central 2023-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10631072/ /pubmed/37936121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01299-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Bijnsdorp, F. M.
Schouten, B.
Reyners, A. K. L.
Wagner, C.
Francke, A. L.
van Schoten, S. M.
Measurement and documentation of quality indicators for the end-of-life care of hospital patients a nationwide retrospective record review study
title Measurement and documentation of quality indicators for the end-of-life care of hospital patients a nationwide retrospective record review study
title_full Measurement and documentation of quality indicators for the end-of-life care of hospital patients a nationwide retrospective record review study
title_fullStr Measurement and documentation of quality indicators for the end-of-life care of hospital patients a nationwide retrospective record review study
title_full_unstemmed Measurement and documentation of quality indicators for the end-of-life care of hospital patients a nationwide retrospective record review study
title_short Measurement and documentation of quality indicators for the end-of-life care of hospital patients a nationwide retrospective record review study
title_sort measurement and documentation of quality indicators for the end-of-life care of hospital patients a nationwide retrospective record review study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10631072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37936121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01299-x
work_keys_str_mv AT bijnsdorpfm measurementanddocumentationofqualityindicatorsfortheendoflifecareofhospitalpatientsanationwideretrospectiverecordreviewstudy
AT schoutenb measurementanddocumentationofqualityindicatorsfortheendoflifecareofhospitalpatientsanationwideretrospectiverecordreviewstudy
AT reynersakl measurementanddocumentationofqualityindicatorsfortheendoflifecareofhospitalpatientsanationwideretrospectiverecordreviewstudy
AT wagnerc measurementanddocumentationofqualityindicatorsfortheendoflifecareofhospitalpatientsanationwideretrospectiverecordreviewstudy
AT franckeal measurementanddocumentationofqualityindicatorsfortheendoflifecareofhospitalpatientsanationwideretrospectiverecordreviewstudy
AT vanschotensm measurementanddocumentationofqualityindicatorsfortheendoflifecareofhospitalpatientsanationwideretrospectiverecordreviewstudy