Cargando…

Efficacy of minimally invasive tubular approaches for management of the lumbar spinal synovial cysts: a meta-analysis

The treatment of lumbar spinal synovial cysts (LSCs) which are relatively rare but can cause neurogenic dysfunction and intractable pain has been a controversial topic for many years. Surgical excision of LSCs is the standard treatment for patients in whom conservative treatment options fail. This m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Ying, Yu, Pei, Xu, Hui, Li, Shenggang, Wang, Qing, Wu, Chunwang, Wang, Ji, Ji, Fufu, Huang, Qiang, Lan, Qing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10631136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37941083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01481-0
_version_ 1785132307238092800
author Chen, Ying
Yu, Pei
Xu, Hui
Li, Shenggang
Wang, Qing
Wu, Chunwang
Wang, Ji
Ji, Fufu
Huang, Qiang
Lan, Qing
author_facet Chen, Ying
Yu, Pei
Xu, Hui
Li, Shenggang
Wang, Qing
Wu, Chunwang
Wang, Ji
Ji, Fufu
Huang, Qiang
Lan, Qing
author_sort Chen, Ying
collection PubMed
description The treatment of lumbar spinal synovial cysts (LSCs) which are relatively rare but can cause neurogenic dysfunction and intractable pain has been a controversial topic for many years. Surgical excision of LSCs is the standard treatment for patients in whom conservative treatment options fail. This meta-analysis was undertaken to compare clinical outcomes between minimally invasive approaches using tubular retractors (microscopic vs. endoscopic) and traditional percutaneous approaches for LSCs. Studies reporting surgical management of LSCs were searched in the Cochrane Library, PubMed and Web of Science database. This meta-analysis was reported following the PRISMA Statement, registered in Prospero (CRD42021288992). A total of 1833 patients were included from both the related relevant studies (41 studies, n = 1831) and the present series (n = 2). Meta-analysis of minimally invasive tubular approaches revealed no statistically significant difference in pain improvement, dural tear, residual cyst, recurrence and operation time between minimal groups with traditional groups (p > 0.05). Minimal groups had better Functional improvement of 100% (95% CI 1.00–1.00; p < 0.001, I(2) = 75.3%) and less reoperation rates of 0% (95% CI − 0.00–0.00; p = 0.007, I(2) = 47.1%). Postoperative length of hospital stay and intraoperative bleeding in minimal groups were also less than traditional groups (p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed endoscopic groups had less operation time (p = 0.004), and there was no significant difference in the rest. For patients with LSCs but without obvious clinical and imaging evidence of vertebral instability, even when preoperative stable grade 1 spondylolisthesis is present, minimally invasive tubular approaches without fusion may provide the best outcome in surgical management. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40001-023-01481-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10631136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106311362023-11-08 Efficacy of minimally invasive tubular approaches for management of the lumbar spinal synovial cysts: a meta-analysis Chen, Ying Yu, Pei Xu, Hui Li, Shenggang Wang, Qing Wu, Chunwang Wang, Ji Ji, Fufu Huang, Qiang Lan, Qing Eur J Med Res Review The treatment of lumbar spinal synovial cysts (LSCs) which are relatively rare but can cause neurogenic dysfunction and intractable pain has been a controversial topic for many years. Surgical excision of LSCs is the standard treatment for patients in whom conservative treatment options fail. This meta-analysis was undertaken to compare clinical outcomes between minimally invasive approaches using tubular retractors (microscopic vs. endoscopic) and traditional percutaneous approaches for LSCs. Studies reporting surgical management of LSCs were searched in the Cochrane Library, PubMed and Web of Science database. This meta-analysis was reported following the PRISMA Statement, registered in Prospero (CRD42021288992). A total of 1833 patients were included from both the related relevant studies (41 studies, n = 1831) and the present series (n = 2). Meta-analysis of minimally invasive tubular approaches revealed no statistically significant difference in pain improvement, dural tear, residual cyst, recurrence and operation time between minimal groups with traditional groups (p > 0.05). Minimal groups had better Functional improvement of 100% (95% CI 1.00–1.00; p < 0.001, I(2) = 75.3%) and less reoperation rates of 0% (95% CI − 0.00–0.00; p = 0.007, I(2) = 47.1%). Postoperative length of hospital stay and intraoperative bleeding in minimal groups were also less than traditional groups (p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed endoscopic groups had less operation time (p = 0.004), and there was no significant difference in the rest. For patients with LSCs but without obvious clinical and imaging evidence of vertebral instability, even when preoperative stable grade 1 spondylolisthesis is present, minimally invasive tubular approaches without fusion may provide the best outcome in surgical management. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40001-023-01481-0. BioMed Central 2023-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10631136/ /pubmed/37941083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01481-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Chen, Ying
Yu, Pei
Xu, Hui
Li, Shenggang
Wang, Qing
Wu, Chunwang
Wang, Ji
Ji, Fufu
Huang, Qiang
Lan, Qing
Efficacy of minimally invasive tubular approaches for management of the lumbar spinal synovial cysts: a meta-analysis
title Efficacy of minimally invasive tubular approaches for management of the lumbar spinal synovial cysts: a meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy of minimally invasive tubular approaches for management of the lumbar spinal synovial cysts: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of minimally invasive tubular approaches for management of the lumbar spinal synovial cysts: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of minimally invasive tubular approaches for management of the lumbar spinal synovial cysts: a meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy of minimally invasive tubular approaches for management of the lumbar spinal synovial cysts: a meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy of minimally invasive tubular approaches for management of the lumbar spinal synovial cysts: a meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10631136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37941083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01481-0
work_keys_str_mv AT chenying efficacyofminimallyinvasivetubularapproachesformanagementofthelumbarspinalsynovialcystsametaanalysis
AT yupei efficacyofminimallyinvasivetubularapproachesformanagementofthelumbarspinalsynovialcystsametaanalysis
AT xuhui efficacyofminimallyinvasivetubularapproachesformanagementofthelumbarspinalsynovialcystsametaanalysis
AT lishenggang efficacyofminimallyinvasivetubularapproachesformanagementofthelumbarspinalsynovialcystsametaanalysis
AT wangqing efficacyofminimallyinvasivetubularapproachesformanagementofthelumbarspinalsynovialcystsametaanalysis
AT wuchunwang efficacyofminimallyinvasivetubularapproachesformanagementofthelumbarspinalsynovialcystsametaanalysis
AT wangji efficacyofminimallyinvasivetubularapproachesformanagementofthelumbarspinalsynovialcystsametaanalysis
AT jifufu efficacyofminimallyinvasivetubularapproachesformanagementofthelumbarspinalsynovialcystsametaanalysis
AT huangqiang efficacyofminimallyinvasivetubularapproachesformanagementofthelumbarspinalsynovialcystsametaanalysis
AT lanqing efficacyofminimallyinvasivetubularapproachesformanagementofthelumbarspinalsynovialcystsametaanalysis