Cargando…
Efficacy of minimally invasive tubular approaches for management of the lumbar spinal synovial cysts: a meta-analysis
The treatment of lumbar spinal synovial cysts (LSCs) which are relatively rare but can cause neurogenic dysfunction and intractable pain has been a controversial topic for many years. Surgical excision of LSCs is the standard treatment for patients in whom conservative treatment options fail. This m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10631136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37941083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01481-0 |
_version_ | 1785132307238092800 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Ying Yu, Pei Xu, Hui Li, Shenggang Wang, Qing Wu, Chunwang Wang, Ji Ji, Fufu Huang, Qiang Lan, Qing |
author_facet | Chen, Ying Yu, Pei Xu, Hui Li, Shenggang Wang, Qing Wu, Chunwang Wang, Ji Ji, Fufu Huang, Qiang Lan, Qing |
author_sort | Chen, Ying |
collection | PubMed |
description | The treatment of lumbar spinal synovial cysts (LSCs) which are relatively rare but can cause neurogenic dysfunction and intractable pain has been a controversial topic for many years. Surgical excision of LSCs is the standard treatment for patients in whom conservative treatment options fail. This meta-analysis was undertaken to compare clinical outcomes between minimally invasive approaches using tubular retractors (microscopic vs. endoscopic) and traditional percutaneous approaches for LSCs. Studies reporting surgical management of LSCs were searched in the Cochrane Library, PubMed and Web of Science database. This meta-analysis was reported following the PRISMA Statement, registered in Prospero (CRD42021288992). A total of 1833 patients were included from both the related relevant studies (41 studies, n = 1831) and the present series (n = 2). Meta-analysis of minimally invasive tubular approaches revealed no statistically significant difference in pain improvement, dural tear, residual cyst, recurrence and operation time between minimal groups with traditional groups (p > 0.05). Minimal groups had better Functional improvement of 100% (95% CI 1.00–1.00; p < 0.001, I(2) = 75.3%) and less reoperation rates of 0% (95% CI − 0.00–0.00; p = 0.007, I(2) = 47.1%). Postoperative length of hospital stay and intraoperative bleeding in minimal groups were also less than traditional groups (p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed endoscopic groups had less operation time (p = 0.004), and there was no significant difference in the rest. For patients with LSCs but without obvious clinical and imaging evidence of vertebral instability, even when preoperative stable grade 1 spondylolisthesis is present, minimally invasive tubular approaches without fusion may provide the best outcome in surgical management. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40001-023-01481-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10631136 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106311362023-11-08 Efficacy of minimally invasive tubular approaches for management of the lumbar spinal synovial cysts: a meta-analysis Chen, Ying Yu, Pei Xu, Hui Li, Shenggang Wang, Qing Wu, Chunwang Wang, Ji Ji, Fufu Huang, Qiang Lan, Qing Eur J Med Res Review The treatment of lumbar spinal synovial cysts (LSCs) which are relatively rare but can cause neurogenic dysfunction and intractable pain has been a controversial topic for many years. Surgical excision of LSCs is the standard treatment for patients in whom conservative treatment options fail. This meta-analysis was undertaken to compare clinical outcomes between minimally invasive approaches using tubular retractors (microscopic vs. endoscopic) and traditional percutaneous approaches for LSCs. Studies reporting surgical management of LSCs were searched in the Cochrane Library, PubMed and Web of Science database. This meta-analysis was reported following the PRISMA Statement, registered in Prospero (CRD42021288992). A total of 1833 patients were included from both the related relevant studies (41 studies, n = 1831) and the present series (n = 2). Meta-analysis of minimally invasive tubular approaches revealed no statistically significant difference in pain improvement, dural tear, residual cyst, recurrence and operation time between minimal groups with traditional groups (p > 0.05). Minimal groups had better Functional improvement of 100% (95% CI 1.00–1.00; p < 0.001, I(2) = 75.3%) and less reoperation rates of 0% (95% CI − 0.00–0.00; p = 0.007, I(2) = 47.1%). Postoperative length of hospital stay and intraoperative bleeding in minimal groups were also less than traditional groups (p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed endoscopic groups had less operation time (p = 0.004), and there was no significant difference in the rest. For patients with LSCs but without obvious clinical and imaging evidence of vertebral instability, even when preoperative stable grade 1 spondylolisthesis is present, minimally invasive tubular approaches without fusion may provide the best outcome in surgical management. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40001-023-01481-0. BioMed Central 2023-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10631136/ /pubmed/37941083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01481-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Chen, Ying Yu, Pei Xu, Hui Li, Shenggang Wang, Qing Wu, Chunwang Wang, Ji Ji, Fufu Huang, Qiang Lan, Qing Efficacy of minimally invasive tubular approaches for management of the lumbar spinal synovial cysts: a meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy of minimally invasive tubular approaches for management of the lumbar spinal synovial cysts: a meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy of minimally invasive tubular approaches for management of the lumbar spinal synovial cysts: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of minimally invasive tubular approaches for management of the lumbar spinal synovial cysts: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of minimally invasive tubular approaches for management of the lumbar spinal synovial cysts: a meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy of minimally invasive tubular approaches for management of the lumbar spinal synovial cysts: a meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy of minimally invasive tubular approaches for management of the lumbar spinal synovial cysts: a meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10631136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37941083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01481-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenying efficacyofminimallyinvasivetubularapproachesformanagementofthelumbarspinalsynovialcystsametaanalysis AT yupei efficacyofminimallyinvasivetubularapproachesformanagementofthelumbarspinalsynovialcystsametaanalysis AT xuhui efficacyofminimallyinvasivetubularapproachesformanagementofthelumbarspinalsynovialcystsametaanalysis AT lishenggang efficacyofminimallyinvasivetubularapproachesformanagementofthelumbarspinalsynovialcystsametaanalysis AT wangqing efficacyofminimallyinvasivetubularapproachesformanagementofthelumbarspinalsynovialcystsametaanalysis AT wuchunwang efficacyofminimallyinvasivetubularapproachesformanagementofthelumbarspinalsynovialcystsametaanalysis AT wangji efficacyofminimallyinvasivetubularapproachesformanagementofthelumbarspinalsynovialcystsametaanalysis AT jifufu efficacyofminimallyinvasivetubularapproachesformanagementofthelumbarspinalsynovialcystsametaanalysis AT huangqiang efficacyofminimallyinvasivetubularapproachesformanagementofthelumbarspinalsynovialcystsametaanalysis AT lanqing efficacyofminimallyinvasivetubularapproachesformanagementofthelumbarspinalsynovialcystsametaanalysis |