Cargando…

How the future of the global forest sink depends on timber demand, forest management, and carbon policies

Deforestation has contributed significantly to net greenhouse gas emissions, but slowing deforestation, regrowing forests and other ecosystem processes have made forests a net sink. Deforestation will still influence future carbon fluxes, but the role of forest growth through aging, management, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daigneault, Adam, Baker, Justin S., Guo, Jinggang, Lauri, Pekka, Favero, Alice, Forsell, Nicklas, Johnston, Craig, Ohrel, Sara B., Sohngen, Brent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10631560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38024226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102582
_version_ 1785132388183965696
author Daigneault, Adam
Baker, Justin S.
Guo, Jinggang
Lauri, Pekka
Favero, Alice
Forsell, Nicklas
Johnston, Craig
Ohrel, Sara B.
Sohngen, Brent
author_facet Daigneault, Adam
Baker, Justin S.
Guo, Jinggang
Lauri, Pekka
Favero, Alice
Forsell, Nicklas
Johnston, Craig
Ohrel, Sara B.
Sohngen, Brent
author_sort Daigneault, Adam
collection PubMed
description Deforestation has contributed significantly to net greenhouse gas emissions, but slowing deforestation, regrowing forests and other ecosystem processes have made forests a net sink. Deforestation will still influence future carbon fluxes, but the role of forest growth through aging, management, and other silvicultural inputs on future carbon fluxes are critically important but not always recognized by bookkeeping and integrated assessment models. When projecting the future, it is vital to capture how management processes affect carbon storage in ecosystems and wood products. This study uses multiple global forest sector models to project forest carbon impacts across 81 shared socioeconomic (SSP) and climate mitigation pathway scenarios. We illustrate the importance of modeling management decisions in existing forests in response to changing demands for land resources, wood products and carbon. Although the models vary in key attributes, there is general agreement across a majority of scenarios that the global forest sector could remain a carbon sink in the future, sequestering 1.2–5.8 GtCO2e/yr over the next century. Carbon fluxes in the baseline scenarios that exclude climate mitigation policy ranged from −0.8 to 4.9 GtCO2e/yr, highlighting the strong influence of SSPs on forest sector model estimates. Improved forest management can jointly increase carbon stocks and harvests without expanding forest area, suggesting that carbon fluxes from managed forests systems deserve more careful consideration by the climate policy community.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10631560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106315602023-11-08 How the future of the global forest sink depends on timber demand, forest management, and carbon policies Daigneault, Adam Baker, Justin S. Guo, Jinggang Lauri, Pekka Favero, Alice Forsell, Nicklas Johnston, Craig Ohrel, Sara B. Sohngen, Brent Glob Environ Change Article Deforestation has contributed significantly to net greenhouse gas emissions, but slowing deforestation, regrowing forests and other ecosystem processes have made forests a net sink. Deforestation will still influence future carbon fluxes, but the role of forest growth through aging, management, and other silvicultural inputs on future carbon fluxes are critically important but not always recognized by bookkeeping and integrated assessment models. When projecting the future, it is vital to capture how management processes affect carbon storage in ecosystems and wood products. This study uses multiple global forest sector models to project forest carbon impacts across 81 shared socioeconomic (SSP) and climate mitigation pathway scenarios. We illustrate the importance of modeling management decisions in existing forests in response to changing demands for land resources, wood products and carbon. Although the models vary in key attributes, there is general agreement across a majority of scenarios that the global forest sector could remain a carbon sink in the future, sequestering 1.2–5.8 GtCO2e/yr over the next century. Carbon fluxes in the baseline scenarios that exclude climate mitigation policy ranged from −0.8 to 4.9 GtCO2e/yr, highlighting the strong influence of SSPs on forest sector model estimates. Improved forest management can jointly increase carbon stocks and harvests without expanding forest area, suggesting that carbon fluxes from managed forests systems deserve more careful consideration by the climate policy community. 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10631560/ /pubmed/38024226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102582 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Daigneault, Adam
Baker, Justin S.
Guo, Jinggang
Lauri, Pekka
Favero, Alice
Forsell, Nicklas
Johnston, Craig
Ohrel, Sara B.
Sohngen, Brent
How the future of the global forest sink depends on timber demand, forest management, and carbon policies
title How the future of the global forest sink depends on timber demand, forest management, and carbon policies
title_full How the future of the global forest sink depends on timber demand, forest management, and carbon policies
title_fullStr How the future of the global forest sink depends on timber demand, forest management, and carbon policies
title_full_unstemmed How the future of the global forest sink depends on timber demand, forest management, and carbon policies
title_short How the future of the global forest sink depends on timber demand, forest management, and carbon policies
title_sort how the future of the global forest sink depends on timber demand, forest management, and carbon policies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10631560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38024226
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102582
work_keys_str_mv AT daigneaultadam howthefutureoftheglobalforestsinkdependsontimberdemandforestmanagementandcarbonpolicies
AT bakerjustins howthefutureoftheglobalforestsinkdependsontimberdemandforestmanagementandcarbonpolicies
AT guojinggang howthefutureoftheglobalforestsinkdependsontimberdemandforestmanagementandcarbonpolicies
AT lauripekka howthefutureoftheglobalforestsinkdependsontimberdemandforestmanagementandcarbonpolicies
AT faveroalice howthefutureoftheglobalforestsinkdependsontimberdemandforestmanagementandcarbonpolicies
AT forsellnicklas howthefutureoftheglobalforestsinkdependsontimberdemandforestmanagementandcarbonpolicies
AT johnstoncraig howthefutureoftheglobalforestsinkdependsontimberdemandforestmanagementandcarbonpolicies
AT ohrelsarab howthefutureoftheglobalforestsinkdependsontimberdemandforestmanagementandcarbonpolicies
AT sohngenbrent howthefutureoftheglobalforestsinkdependsontimberdemandforestmanagementandcarbonpolicies