Cargando…

A mechanistic insight into sources of error of visual working memory in multiple sclerosis

Working memory (WM) is one of the most affected cognitive domains in multiple sclerosis (MS), which is mainly studied by the previously established binary model for information storage (slot model). However, recent observations based on the continuous reproduction paradigms have shown that assuming...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Motahharynia, Ali, Pourmohammadi, Ahmad, Adibi, Armin, Shaygannejad, Vahid, Ashtari, Fereshteh, Adibi, Iman, Sanayei, Mehdi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10631758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37937840
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.87442
_version_ 1785132431453454336
author Motahharynia, Ali
Pourmohammadi, Ahmad
Adibi, Armin
Shaygannejad, Vahid
Ashtari, Fereshteh
Adibi, Iman
Sanayei, Mehdi
author_facet Motahharynia, Ali
Pourmohammadi, Ahmad
Adibi, Armin
Shaygannejad, Vahid
Ashtari, Fereshteh
Adibi, Iman
Sanayei, Mehdi
author_sort Motahharynia, Ali
collection PubMed
description Working memory (WM) is one of the most affected cognitive domains in multiple sclerosis (MS), which is mainly studied by the previously established binary model for information storage (slot model). However, recent observations based on the continuous reproduction paradigms have shown that assuming dynamic allocation of WM resources (resource model) instead of the binary hypothesis will give more accurate predictions in WM assessment. Moreover, continuous reproduction paradigms allow for assessing the distribution of error in recalling information, providing new insights into the organization of the WM system. Hence, by utilizing two continuous reproduction paradigms, memory-guided localization (MGL) and analog recall task with sequential presentation, we investigated WM dysfunction in MS. Our results demonstrated an overall increase in recall error and decreased recall precision in MS. While sequential paradigms were better in distinguishing healthy control from relapsing-remitting MS, MGL were more accurate in discriminating MS subtypes (relapsing-remitting from secondary progressive), providing evidence about the underlying mechanisms of WM deficit in progressive states of the disease. Furthermore, computational modeling of the results from the sequential paradigm determined that imprecision in decoding information and swap error (mistakenly reporting the feature of other presented items) was responsible for WM dysfunction in MS. Overall, this study offered a sensitive measure for assessing WM deficit and provided new insight into the organization of the WM system in MS population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10631758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106317582023-11-09 A mechanistic insight into sources of error of visual working memory in multiple sclerosis Motahharynia, Ali Pourmohammadi, Ahmad Adibi, Armin Shaygannejad, Vahid Ashtari, Fereshteh Adibi, Iman Sanayei, Mehdi eLife Neuroscience Working memory (WM) is one of the most affected cognitive domains in multiple sclerosis (MS), which is mainly studied by the previously established binary model for information storage (slot model). However, recent observations based on the continuous reproduction paradigms have shown that assuming dynamic allocation of WM resources (resource model) instead of the binary hypothesis will give more accurate predictions in WM assessment. Moreover, continuous reproduction paradigms allow for assessing the distribution of error in recalling information, providing new insights into the organization of the WM system. Hence, by utilizing two continuous reproduction paradigms, memory-guided localization (MGL) and analog recall task with sequential presentation, we investigated WM dysfunction in MS. Our results demonstrated an overall increase in recall error and decreased recall precision in MS. While sequential paradigms were better in distinguishing healthy control from relapsing-remitting MS, MGL were more accurate in discriminating MS subtypes (relapsing-remitting from secondary progressive), providing evidence about the underlying mechanisms of WM deficit in progressive states of the disease. Furthermore, computational modeling of the results from the sequential paradigm determined that imprecision in decoding information and swap error (mistakenly reporting the feature of other presented items) was responsible for WM dysfunction in MS. Overall, this study offered a sensitive measure for assessing WM deficit and provided new insight into the organization of the WM system in MS population. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2023-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10631758/ /pubmed/37937840 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.87442 Text en © 2023, Motahharynia, Pourmohammadi et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Motahharynia, Ali
Pourmohammadi, Ahmad
Adibi, Armin
Shaygannejad, Vahid
Ashtari, Fereshteh
Adibi, Iman
Sanayei, Mehdi
A mechanistic insight into sources of error of visual working memory in multiple sclerosis
title A mechanistic insight into sources of error of visual working memory in multiple sclerosis
title_full A mechanistic insight into sources of error of visual working memory in multiple sclerosis
title_fullStr A mechanistic insight into sources of error of visual working memory in multiple sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed A mechanistic insight into sources of error of visual working memory in multiple sclerosis
title_short A mechanistic insight into sources of error of visual working memory in multiple sclerosis
title_sort mechanistic insight into sources of error of visual working memory in multiple sclerosis
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10631758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37937840
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.87442
work_keys_str_mv AT motahharyniaali amechanisticinsightintosourcesoferrorofvisualworkingmemoryinmultiplesclerosis
AT pourmohammadiahmad amechanisticinsightintosourcesoferrorofvisualworkingmemoryinmultiplesclerosis
AT adibiarmin amechanisticinsightintosourcesoferrorofvisualworkingmemoryinmultiplesclerosis
AT shaygannejadvahid amechanisticinsightintosourcesoferrorofvisualworkingmemoryinmultiplesclerosis
AT ashtarifereshteh amechanisticinsightintosourcesoferrorofvisualworkingmemoryinmultiplesclerosis
AT adibiiman amechanisticinsightintosourcesoferrorofvisualworkingmemoryinmultiplesclerosis
AT sanayeimehdi amechanisticinsightintosourcesoferrorofvisualworkingmemoryinmultiplesclerosis
AT motahharyniaali mechanisticinsightintosourcesoferrorofvisualworkingmemoryinmultiplesclerosis
AT pourmohammadiahmad mechanisticinsightintosourcesoferrorofvisualworkingmemoryinmultiplesclerosis
AT adibiarmin mechanisticinsightintosourcesoferrorofvisualworkingmemoryinmultiplesclerosis
AT shaygannejadvahid mechanisticinsightintosourcesoferrorofvisualworkingmemoryinmultiplesclerosis
AT ashtarifereshteh mechanisticinsightintosourcesoferrorofvisualworkingmemoryinmultiplesclerosis
AT adibiiman mechanisticinsightintosourcesoferrorofvisualworkingmemoryinmultiplesclerosis
AT sanayeimehdi mechanisticinsightintosourcesoferrorofvisualworkingmemoryinmultiplesclerosis