Cargando…

Development and validation of a bioanalytical assay for the measurement of total and unbound teicoplanin in human serum

BACKGROUND: The glycopeptide teicoplanin is considered first-line treatment for severe infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria. Individualized treatment of teicoplanin is gaining interest. As only protein-unbound drug is pharmacologically active, a sensitive assay measuring unbound and total tei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mouton, J W A, Raaijmakers, J, Botterblom, M, Toonen, M, ter Heine, R, Smeets, R L, Brüggemann, R J M, te Brake, L, Jager, N G L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10631822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37757461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkad290
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The glycopeptide teicoplanin is considered first-line treatment for severe infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria. Individualized treatment of teicoplanin is gaining interest. As only protein-unbound drug is pharmacologically active, a sensitive assay measuring unbound and total teicoplanin is indispensable for pharmacological research and dose optimization. OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a UPLC-MS/MS method to quantify unbound and total teicoplanin in human serum. METHODS: The developed assay was validated according to the ICH guideline M10 on Bioanalytical Method Validation and study sample analysis. Unbound teicoplanin was obtained by ultrafiltration. The assay was cross-validated with a quantitative microsphere (QMS) immunoassay in a side-by-side comparison using 40 patient samples. RESULTS: With the developed and validated method, all main teicoplanin components (A2-1, A2-2/A2-3, A2-4/A2-5 and A3-1) can be quantified. Total run time was 5.5 min. Concentration range was 2.5–150 mg/L for total and 0.1–25 mg/L for unbound teicoplanin. Precision (coefficient of variation) and accuracy (bias) of total teicoplanin were 5.97% and 107%, respectively, and 7.17% and 108%, respectively, for unbound teicoplanin. Bland–Altman analysis showed total concentrations measured with the UPLC-MS/MS method were equivalent to the results of the QMS immunoassay. A total of 188 samples from 30 patients admitted to the ICU and haematology department were measured; total concentrations ranged between 2.92 and 98.5 mg/L, and unbound concentrations ranged between 0.37 and 30.7 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: The developed method provided rapid, precise and accurate measurement of unbound and total teicoplanin. The developed method is now routinely applied in pharmacological research and clinical practice.