Cargando…

Pretreatment albumin is a prognostic and predictive biomarker for response to atezolizumab across solid tumors

OBJECTIVES: Reliable predictive biomarkers for response to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) are lacking. Pretreatment serum albumin, a known prognostic and predictive factor in ICI‐treated patients, has been proposed as a potential pharmacokinetic surrogate marker for anti‐PD1/PD‐L1 antibodies, as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saal, Jonas, Ellinger, Jörg, Ritter, Manuel, Brossart, Peter, Hölzel, Michael, Klümper, Niklas, Bald, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10632074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37946873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cti2.1472
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Reliable predictive biomarkers for response to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) are lacking. Pretreatment serum albumin, a known prognostic and predictive factor in ICI‐treated patients, has been proposed as a potential pharmacokinetic surrogate marker for anti‐PD1/PD‐L1 antibodies, as it shares a homeostatic pathway with IgG. However, this hypothesis is currently based on theoretical considerations and limited evidence from retrospective data. Therefore, we comprehensively investigated the prognostic and predictive value of pretreatment albumin and its relationship with anti‐PD‐L1 IgG levels. METHODS: We analysed pretreatment albumin and atezolizumab serum levels and clinical response in four trials (IMvigor210, IMvigor211, IMmotion151 and OAK) of patients with metastatic lung‐, renal‐ or urothelial cancer who received atezolizumab alone or in combination. RESULTS: A total of 3391 patients were analysed. Correlation between serum albumin and atezolizumab levels was weak (Pearson's coefficient 0.23). We found a strong prognostic value for pretreatment serum albumin across all trials. Both atezolizumab serum levels and serum albumin were independently correlated with overall survival. Importantly, in the three randomised phase III clinical trials, the survival benefit for immunotherapy compared with the active comparator arm was limited to patients with pretreatment serum albumin > 35 g L(−1). CONCLUSION: Our data do not support the hypothesis that albumin serves as a surrogate for atezolizumab pharmacokinetics. However, we show that albumin on its own exerts strong prognostic value for patients treated with immunotherapy. As benefit from immunotherapy was limited to patients with normal/elevated serum albumin levels, baseline albumin could potentially be used as a predictive marker for immune checkpoint inhibition.