Cargando…

Identification of patients at high risk for brain death using an automated digital screening tool: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study

BACKGROUND: An automated digital screening tool (DETECT) has been developed to aid in the early identification of patients who are at risk of developing brain death during critical care. METHODS: This prospective diagnostic accuracy study included consecutive patients ≥ 18 years admitted to neurocri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schoene, Daniela, Freigang, Norman, Trabitzsch, Anne, Pleul, Konrad, Kaiser, Daniel P. O., Roessler, Martin, Winzer, Simon, Hugo, Christian, Günther, Albrecht, Puetz, Volker, Barlinn, Kristian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10632197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37626244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11938-1
_version_ 1785146113796341760
author Schoene, Daniela
Freigang, Norman
Trabitzsch, Anne
Pleul, Konrad
Kaiser, Daniel P. O.
Roessler, Martin
Winzer, Simon
Hugo, Christian
Günther, Albrecht
Puetz, Volker
Barlinn, Kristian
author_facet Schoene, Daniela
Freigang, Norman
Trabitzsch, Anne
Pleul, Konrad
Kaiser, Daniel P. O.
Roessler, Martin
Winzer, Simon
Hugo, Christian
Günther, Albrecht
Puetz, Volker
Barlinn, Kristian
author_sort Schoene, Daniela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An automated digital screening tool (DETECT) has been developed to aid in the early identification of patients who are at risk of developing brain death during critical care. METHODS: This prospective diagnostic accuracy study included consecutive patients ≥ 18 years admitted to neurocritical care for primary or secondary acute brain injury. The DETECT screening tool searched routinely monitored patient data in the electronic medical records every 12 h for a combination of coma and absence of bilateral pupillary light reflexes. In parallel, daily neurological assessment was performed by expert neurointensivists in all patients blinded to the index test results. The primary target condition was the eventual diagnosis of brain death. Estimates of diagnostic accuracy along with their 95%-confidence intervals were calculated to assess the screening performance of DETECT. RESULTS: During the 12-month study period, 414 patients underwent neurological assessment, with 8 (1.9%) confirmed cases of brain death. DETECT identified 54 positive patients and sent 281 notifications including 227 repeat notifications. The screening tool had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 63.1–100%) in identifying patients who eventually developed brain death, with no false negatives. The mean time from notification to confirmed diagnosis of brain death was 3.6 ± 3.2 days. Specificity was 88.7% (95% CI 85.2–91.6%), with 46 false positives. The overall accuracy of DETECT for confirmed brain death was 88.9% (95% CI 85.5–91.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that an automated digital screening tool that utilizes routinely monitored clinical data may aid in the early identification of patients at risk of developing brain death.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10632197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106321972023-11-14 Identification of patients at high risk for brain death using an automated digital screening tool: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study Schoene, Daniela Freigang, Norman Trabitzsch, Anne Pleul, Konrad Kaiser, Daniel P. O. Roessler, Martin Winzer, Simon Hugo, Christian Günther, Albrecht Puetz, Volker Barlinn, Kristian J Neurol Original Communication BACKGROUND: An automated digital screening tool (DETECT) has been developed to aid in the early identification of patients who are at risk of developing brain death during critical care. METHODS: This prospective diagnostic accuracy study included consecutive patients ≥ 18 years admitted to neurocritical care for primary or secondary acute brain injury. The DETECT screening tool searched routinely monitored patient data in the electronic medical records every 12 h for a combination of coma and absence of bilateral pupillary light reflexes. In parallel, daily neurological assessment was performed by expert neurointensivists in all patients blinded to the index test results. The primary target condition was the eventual diagnosis of brain death. Estimates of diagnostic accuracy along with their 95%-confidence intervals were calculated to assess the screening performance of DETECT. RESULTS: During the 12-month study period, 414 patients underwent neurological assessment, with 8 (1.9%) confirmed cases of brain death. DETECT identified 54 positive patients and sent 281 notifications including 227 repeat notifications. The screening tool had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 63.1–100%) in identifying patients who eventually developed brain death, with no false negatives. The mean time from notification to confirmed diagnosis of brain death was 3.6 ± 3.2 days. Specificity was 88.7% (95% CI 85.2–91.6%), with 46 false positives. The overall accuracy of DETECT for confirmed brain death was 88.9% (95% CI 85.5–91.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that an automated digital screening tool that utilizes routinely monitored clinical data may aid in the early identification of patients at risk of developing brain death. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-08-25 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10632197/ /pubmed/37626244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11938-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Communication
Schoene, Daniela
Freigang, Norman
Trabitzsch, Anne
Pleul, Konrad
Kaiser, Daniel P. O.
Roessler, Martin
Winzer, Simon
Hugo, Christian
Günther, Albrecht
Puetz, Volker
Barlinn, Kristian
Identification of patients at high risk for brain death using an automated digital screening tool: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study
title Identification of patients at high risk for brain death using an automated digital screening tool: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study
title_full Identification of patients at high risk for brain death using an automated digital screening tool: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study
title_fullStr Identification of patients at high risk for brain death using an automated digital screening tool: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study
title_full_unstemmed Identification of patients at high risk for brain death using an automated digital screening tool: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study
title_short Identification of patients at high risk for brain death using an automated digital screening tool: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study
title_sort identification of patients at high risk for brain death using an automated digital screening tool: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study
topic Original Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10632197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37626244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11938-1
work_keys_str_mv AT schoenedaniela identificationofpatientsathighriskforbraindeathusinganautomateddigitalscreeningtoolaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudy
AT freigangnorman identificationofpatientsathighriskforbraindeathusinganautomateddigitalscreeningtoolaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudy
AT trabitzschanne identificationofpatientsathighriskforbraindeathusinganautomateddigitalscreeningtoolaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudy
AT pleulkonrad identificationofpatientsathighriskforbraindeathusinganautomateddigitalscreeningtoolaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudy
AT kaiserdanielpo identificationofpatientsathighriskforbraindeathusinganautomateddigitalscreeningtoolaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudy
AT roesslermartin identificationofpatientsathighriskforbraindeathusinganautomateddigitalscreeningtoolaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudy
AT winzersimon identificationofpatientsathighriskforbraindeathusinganautomateddigitalscreeningtoolaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudy
AT hugochristian identificationofpatientsathighriskforbraindeathusinganautomateddigitalscreeningtoolaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudy
AT guntheralbrecht identificationofpatientsathighriskforbraindeathusinganautomateddigitalscreeningtoolaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudy
AT puetzvolker identificationofpatientsathighriskforbraindeathusinganautomateddigitalscreeningtoolaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudy
AT barlinnkristian identificationofpatientsathighriskforbraindeathusinganautomateddigitalscreeningtoolaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudy