Cargando…
Identification of patients at high risk for brain death using an automated digital screening tool: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study
BACKGROUND: An automated digital screening tool (DETECT) has been developed to aid in the early identification of patients who are at risk of developing brain death during critical care. METHODS: This prospective diagnostic accuracy study included consecutive patients ≥ 18 years admitted to neurocri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10632197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37626244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11938-1 |
_version_ | 1785146113796341760 |
---|---|
author | Schoene, Daniela Freigang, Norman Trabitzsch, Anne Pleul, Konrad Kaiser, Daniel P. O. Roessler, Martin Winzer, Simon Hugo, Christian Günther, Albrecht Puetz, Volker Barlinn, Kristian |
author_facet | Schoene, Daniela Freigang, Norman Trabitzsch, Anne Pleul, Konrad Kaiser, Daniel P. O. Roessler, Martin Winzer, Simon Hugo, Christian Günther, Albrecht Puetz, Volker Barlinn, Kristian |
author_sort | Schoene, Daniela |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An automated digital screening tool (DETECT) has been developed to aid in the early identification of patients who are at risk of developing brain death during critical care. METHODS: This prospective diagnostic accuracy study included consecutive patients ≥ 18 years admitted to neurocritical care for primary or secondary acute brain injury. The DETECT screening tool searched routinely monitored patient data in the electronic medical records every 12 h for a combination of coma and absence of bilateral pupillary light reflexes. In parallel, daily neurological assessment was performed by expert neurointensivists in all patients blinded to the index test results. The primary target condition was the eventual diagnosis of brain death. Estimates of diagnostic accuracy along with their 95%-confidence intervals were calculated to assess the screening performance of DETECT. RESULTS: During the 12-month study period, 414 patients underwent neurological assessment, with 8 (1.9%) confirmed cases of brain death. DETECT identified 54 positive patients and sent 281 notifications including 227 repeat notifications. The screening tool had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 63.1–100%) in identifying patients who eventually developed brain death, with no false negatives. The mean time from notification to confirmed diagnosis of brain death was 3.6 ± 3.2 days. Specificity was 88.7% (95% CI 85.2–91.6%), with 46 false positives. The overall accuracy of DETECT for confirmed brain death was 88.9% (95% CI 85.5–91.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that an automated digital screening tool that utilizes routinely monitored clinical data may aid in the early identification of patients at risk of developing brain death. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10632197 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106321972023-11-14 Identification of patients at high risk for brain death using an automated digital screening tool: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study Schoene, Daniela Freigang, Norman Trabitzsch, Anne Pleul, Konrad Kaiser, Daniel P. O. Roessler, Martin Winzer, Simon Hugo, Christian Günther, Albrecht Puetz, Volker Barlinn, Kristian J Neurol Original Communication BACKGROUND: An automated digital screening tool (DETECT) has been developed to aid in the early identification of patients who are at risk of developing brain death during critical care. METHODS: This prospective diagnostic accuracy study included consecutive patients ≥ 18 years admitted to neurocritical care for primary or secondary acute brain injury. The DETECT screening tool searched routinely monitored patient data in the electronic medical records every 12 h for a combination of coma and absence of bilateral pupillary light reflexes. In parallel, daily neurological assessment was performed by expert neurointensivists in all patients blinded to the index test results. The primary target condition was the eventual diagnosis of brain death. Estimates of diagnostic accuracy along with their 95%-confidence intervals were calculated to assess the screening performance of DETECT. RESULTS: During the 12-month study period, 414 patients underwent neurological assessment, with 8 (1.9%) confirmed cases of brain death. DETECT identified 54 positive patients and sent 281 notifications including 227 repeat notifications. The screening tool had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 63.1–100%) in identifying patients who eventually developed brain death, with no false negatives. The mean time from notification to confirmed diagnosis of brain death was 3.6 ± 3.2 days. Specificity was 88.7% (95% CI 85.2–91.6%), with 46 false positives. The overall accuracy of DETECT for confirmed brain death was 88.9% (95% CI 85.5–91.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that an automated digital screening tool that utilizes routinely monitored clinical data may aid in the early identification of patients at risk of developing brain death. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-08-25 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10632197/ /pubmed/37626244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11938-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Communication Schoene, Daniela Freigang, Norman Trabitzsch, Anne Pleul, Konrad Kaiser, Daniel P. O. Roessler, Martin Winzer, Simon Hugo, Christian Günther, Albrecht Puetz, Volker Barlinn, Kristian Identification of patients at high risk for brain death using an automated digital screening tool: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study |
title | Identification of patients at high risk for brain death using an automated digital screening tool: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study |
title_full | Identification of patients at high risk for brain death using an automated digital screening tool: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study |
title_fullStr | Identification of patients at high risk for brain death using an automated digital screening tool: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study |
title_full_unstemmed | Identification of patients at high risk for brain death using an automated digital screening tool: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study |
title_short | Identification of patients at high risk for brain death using an automated digital screening tool: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study |
title_sort | identification of patients at high risk for brain death using an automated digital screening tool: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study |
topic | Original Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10632197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37626244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11938-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schoenedaniela identificationofpatientsathighriskforbraindeathusinganautomateddigitalscreeningtoolaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudy AT freigangnorman identificationofpatientsathighriskforbraindeathusinganautomateddigitalscreeningtoolaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudy AT trabitzschanne identificationofpatientsathighriskforbraindeathusinganautomateddigitalscreeningtoolaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudy AT pleulkonrad identificationofpatientsathighriskforbraindeathusinganautomateddigitalscreeningtoolaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudy AT kaiserdanielpo identificationofpatientsathighriskforbraindeathusinganautomateddigitalscreeningtoolaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudy AT roesslermartin identificationofpatientsathighriskforbraindeathusinganautomateddigitalscreeningtoolaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudy AT winzersimon identificationofpatientsathighriskforbraindeathusinganautomateddigitalscreeningtoolaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudy AT hugochristian identificationofpatientsathighriskforbraindeathusinganautomateddigitalscreeningtoolaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudy AT guntheralbrecht identificationofpatientsathighriskforbraindeathusinganautomateddigitalscreeningtoolaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudy AT puetzvolker identificationofpatientsathighriskforbraindeathusinganautomateddigitalscreeningtoolaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudy AT barlinnkristian identificationofpatientsathighriskforbraindeathusinganautomateddigitalscreeningtoolaprospectivediagnosticaccuracystudy |