Cargando…

A dynamic interpretation of κFLC index for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a change of perspective

BACKGROUND: Previous studies attempted to define the best threshold for κ free light chains (κFLC) index, confirming higher sensitivity (Se) but less specificity (Sp) compared with IgG oligoclonal bands (OCB) for the diagnosis of MS. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of different κFLC i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toscano, Simona, Chisari, Clara Grazia, Lo Fermo, Salvatore, Gulino, Giuseppa, Zappia, Mario, Patti, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10632300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37639016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11952-3
_version_ 1785146135430561792
author Toscano, Simona
Chisari, Clara Grazia
Lo Fermo, Salvatore
Gulino, Giuseppa
Zappia, Mario
Patti, Francesco
author_facet Toscano, Simona
Chisari, Clara Grazia
Lo Fermo, Salvatore
Gulino, Giuseppa
Zappia, Mario
Patti, Francesco
author_sort Toscano, Simona
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies attempted to define the best threshold for κ free light chains (κFLC) index, confirming higher sensitivity (Se) but less specificity (Sp) compared with IgG oligoclonal bands (OCB) for the diagnosis of MS. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of different κFLC index intervals in a miscellaneous cohort of neurological patients, proposing a procedural flowchart for MS diagnosis. METHODS: We analyzed data from 607 patients diagnosed with MS (179), CIS (116), other inflammatory (94) or non-inflammatory neurological diseases (218). Measures of diagnostic accuracy were reported for different potential thresholds of κFLC index, and for IgG OCB and IgG index. Binary logistic regression was to used to calculate the odds of being diagnosed with MS based on each increase of κFLC index. RESULTS: CSF IgG OCB showed 72.2% Se (CI 95% 68.4–75.7) and 95.2% Sp (CI 95% 93.1–96.7) in discriminating between MS/CIS and controls, with an AUC of 0.84 (CI 95% 0.80–0.87). The highest diagnostic accuracy was reported for κFLC index cut-off of 5.0 (Se = 85.4%, Sp = 90.4%, AUC = 0.88), while a threshold of 11.0 exhibited higher Sp (95.5%, 95% CI 93.1–97.1) than IgG OCB. AUCs for all thresholds between 4.25 and 6.6 were not significantly different from each other, but were significantly higher than the AUC of IgG OCB (p < 0.05). The odds of being diagnosed with MS/CIS increased by 17.1% for each unit increase of κFLC index (OR = 1.17; 95% CI 1.12–1.23; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: κFLC index performed better than CSF IgG OCB in supporting the diagnosis of MS/CIS, with the advantage of being a cost-effective and quantitative analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10632300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106323002023-11-14 A dynamic interpretation of κFLC index for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a change of perspective Toscano, Simona Chisari, Clara Grazia Lo Fermo, Salvatore Gulino, Giuseppa Zappia, Mario Patti, Francesco J Neurol Original Communication BACKGROUND: Previous studies attempted to define the best threshold for κ free light chains (κFLC) index, confirming higher sensitivity (Se) but less specificity (Sp) compared with IgG oligoclonal bands (OCB) for the diagnosis of MS. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of different κFLC index intervals in a miscellaneous cohort of neurological patients, proposing a procedural flowchart for MS diagnosis. METHODS: We analyzed data from 607 patients diagnosed with MS (179), CIS (116), other inflammatory (94) or non-inflammatory neurological diseases (218). Measures of diagnostic accuracy were reported for different potential thresholds of κFLC index, and for IgG OCB and IgG index. Binary logistic regression was to used to calculate the odds of being diagnosed with MS based on each increase of κFLC index. RESULTS: CSF IgG OCB showed 72.2% Se (CI 95% 68.4–75.7) and 95.2% Sp (CI 95% 93.1–96.7) in discriminating between MS/CIS and controls, with an AUC of 0.84 (CI 95% 0.80–0.87). The highest diagnostic accuracy was reported for κFLC index cut-off of 5.0 (Se = 85.4%, Sp = 90.4%, AUC = 0.88), while a threshold of 11.0 exhibited higher Sp (95.5%, 95% CI 93.1–97.1) than IgG OCB. AUCs for all thresholds between 4.25 and 6.6 were not significantly different from each other, but were significantly higher than the AUC of IgG OCB (p < 0.05). The odds of being diagnosed with MS/CIS increased by 17.1% for each unit increase of κFLC index (OR = 1.17; 95% CI 1.12–1.23; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: κFLC index performed better than CSF IgG OCB in supporting the diagnosis of MS/CIS, with the advantage of being a cost-effective and quantitative analysis. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-08-28 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10632300/ /pubmed/37639016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11952-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Communication
Toscano, Simona
Chisari, Clara Grazia
Lo Fermo, Salvatore
Gulino, Giuseppa
Zappia, Mario
Patti, Francesco
A dynamic interpretation of κFLC index for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a change of perspective
title A dynamic interpretation of κFLC index for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a change of perspective
title_full A dynamic interpretation of κFLC index for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a change of perspective
title_fullStr A dynamic interpretation of κFLC index for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a change of perspective
title_full_unstemmed A dynamic interpretation of κFLC index for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a change of perspective
title_short A dynamic interpretation of κFLC index for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a change of perspective
title_sort dynamic interpretation of κflc index for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a change of perspective
topic Original Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10632300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37639016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11952-3
work_keys_str_mv AT toscanosimona adynamicinterpretationofkflcindexforthediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisachangeofperspective
AT chisariclaragrazia adynamicinterpretationofkflcindexforthediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisachangeofperspective
AT lofermosalvatore adynamicinterpretationofkflcindexforthediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisachangeofperspective
AT gulinogiuseppa adynamicinterpretationofkflcindexforthediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisachangeofperspective
AT zappiamario adynamicinterpretationofkflcindexforthediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisachangeofperspective
AT pattifrancesco adynamicinterpretationofkflcindexforthediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisachangeofperspective
AT toscanosimona dynamicinterpretationofkflcindexforthediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisachangeofperspective
AT chisariclaragrazia dynamicinterpretationofkflcindexforthediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisachangeofperspective
AT lofermosalvatore dynamicinterpretationofkflcindexforthediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisachangeofperspective
AT gulinogiuseppa dynamicinterpretationofkflcindexforthediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisachangeofperspective
AT zappiamario dynamicinterpretationofkflcindexforthediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisachangeofperspective
AT pattifrancesco dynamicinterpretationofkflcindexforthediagnosisofmultiplesclerosisachangeofperspective