Cargando…

Prediction models for hormone receptor status in female breast cancer do not extend to males: further evidence of sex-based disparity in breast cancer

Breast cancer prognosis and management for both men and women are reliant upon estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression to inform therapy. Previous studies have shown that there are sex-specific binding characteristics of ERα and PR in breast cancer and, counterintuiti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chatterji, Subarnarekha, Niehues, Jan Moritz, van Treeck, Marko, Loeffler, Chiara Maria Lavinia, Saldanha, Oliver Lester, Veldhuizen, Gregory Patrick, Cifci, Didem, Carrero, Zunamys Itzell, Abu-Eid, Rasha, Speirs, Valerie, Kather, Jakob Nikolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10632426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37940649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-023-00599-y
_version_ 1785132574017847296
author Chatterji, Subarnarekha
Niehues, Jan Moritz
van Treeck, Marko
Loeffler, Chiara Maria Lavinia
Saldanha, Oliver Lester
Veldhuizen, Gregory Patrick
Cifci, Didem
Carrero, Zunamys Itzell
Abu-Eid, Rasha
Speirs, Valerie
Kather, Jakob Nikolas
author_facet Chatterji, Subarnarekha
Niehues, Jan Moritz
van Treeck, Marko
Loeffler, Chiara Maria Lavinia
Saldanha, Oliver Lester
Veldhuizen, Gregory Patrick
Cifci, Didem
Carrero, Zunamys Itzell
Abu-Eid, Rasha
Speirs, Valerie
Kather, Jakob Nikolas
author_sort Chatterji, Subarnarekha
collection PubMed
description Breast cancer prognosis and management for both men and women are reliant upon estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression to inform therapy. Previous studies have shown that there are sex-specific binding characteristics of ERα and PR in breast cancer and, counterintuitively, ERα expression is more common in male than female breast cancer. We hypothesized that these differences could have morphological manifestations that are undetectable to human observers but could be elucidated computationally. To investigate this, we trained attention-based multiple instance learning prediction models for ERα and PR using H&E-stained images of female breast cancer from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (n = 1085) and deployed them on external female (n = 192) and male breast cancer images (n = 245). Both targets were predicted in the internal (AUROC for ERα prediction: 0.86 ± 0.02, p < 0.001; AUROC for PR prediction = 0.76 ± 0.03, p < 0.001) and external female cohorts (AUROC for ERα prediction: 0.78 ± 0.03, p < 0.001; AUROC for PR prediction = 0.80 ± 0.04, p < 0.001) but not the male cohort (AUROC for ERα prediction: 0.66 ± 0.14, p = 0.43; AUROC for PR prediction = 0.63 ± 0.04, p = 0.05). This suggests that subtle morphological differences invisible upon visual inspection may exist between the sexes, supporting previous immunohistochemical, genomic, and transcriptomic analyses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10632426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106324262023-11-10 Prediction models for hormone receptor status in female breast cancer do not extend to males: further evidence of sex-based disparity in breast cancer Chatterji, Subarnarekha Niehues, Jan Moritz van Treeck, Marko Loeffler, Chiara Maria Lavinia Saldanha, Oliver Lester Veldhuizen, Gregory Patrick Cifci, Didem Carrero, Zunamys Itzell Abu-Eid, Rasha Speirs, Valerie Kather, Jakob Nikolas NPJ Breast Cancer Article Breast cancer prognosis and management for both men and women are reliant upon estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression to inform therapy. Previous studies have shown that there are sex-specific binding characteristics of ERα and PR in breast cancer and, counterintuitively, ERα expression is more common in male than female breast cancer. We hypothesized that these differences could have morphological manifestations that are undetectable to human observers but could be elucidated computationally. To investigate this, we trained attention-based multiple instance learning prediction models for ERα and PR using H&E-stained images of female breast cancer from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (n = 1085) and deployed them on external female (n = 192) and male breast cancer images (n = 245). Both targets were predicted in the internal (AUROC for ERα prediction: 0.86 ± 0.02, p < 0.001; AUROC for PR prediction = 0.76 ± 0.03, p < 0.001) and external female cohorts (AUROC for ERα prediction: 0.78 ± 0.03, p < 0.001; AUROC for PR prediction = 0.80 ± 0.04, p < 0.001) but not the male cohort (AUROC for ERα prediction: 0.66 ± 0.14, p = 0.43; AUROC for PR prediction = 0.63 ± 0.04, p = 0.05). This suggests that subtle morphological differences invisible upon visual inspection may exist between the sexes, supporting previous immunohistochemical, genomic, and transcriptomic analyses. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10632426/ /pubmed/37940649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-023-00599-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Chatterji, Subarnarekha
Niehues, Jan Moritz
van Treeck, Marko
Loeffler, Chiara Maria Lavinia
Saldanha, Oliver Lester
Veldhuizen, Gregory Patrick
Cifci, Didem
Carrero, Zunamys Itzell
Abu-Eid, Rasha
Speirs, Valerie
Kather, Jakob Nikolas
Prediction models for hormone receptor status in female breast cancer do not extend to males: further evidence of sex-based disparity in breast cancer
title Prediction models for hormone receptor status in female breast cancer do not extend to males: further evidence of sex-based disparity in breast cancer
title_full Prediction models for hormone receptor status in female breast cancer do not extend to males: further evidence of sex-based disparity in breast cancer
title_fullStr Prediction models for hormone receptor status in female breast cancer do not extend to males: further evidence of sex-based disparity in breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Prediction models for hormone receptor status in female breast cancer do not extend to males: further evidence of sex-based disparity in breast cancer
title_short Prediction models for hormone receptor status in female breast cancer do not extend to males: further evidence of sex-based disparity in breast cancer
title_sort prediction models for hormone receptor status in female breast cancer do not extend to males: further evidence of sex-based disparity in breast cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10632426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37940649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-023-00599-y
work_keys_str_mv AT chatterjisubarnarekha predictionmodelsforhormonereceptorstatusinfemalebreastcancerdonotextendtomalesfurtherevidenceofsexbaseddisparityinbreastcancer
AT niehuesjanmoritz predictionmodelsforhormonereceptorstatusinfemalebreastcancerdonotextendtomalesfurtherevidenceofsexbaseddisparityinbreastcancer
AT vantreeckmarko predictionmodelsforhormonereceptorstatusinfemalebreastcancerdonotextendtomalesfurtherevidenceofsexbaseddisparityinbreastcancer
AT loefflerchiaramarialavinia predictionmodelsforhormonereceptorstatusinfemalebreastcancerdonotextendtomalesfurtherevidenceofsexbaseddisparityinbreastcancer
AT saldanhaoliverlester predictionmodelsforhormonereceptorstatusinfemalebreastcancerdonotextendtomalesfurtherevidenceofsexbaseddisparityinbreastcancer
AT veldhuizengregorypatrick predictionmodelsforhormonereceptorstatusinfemalebreastcancerdonotextendtomalesfurtherevidenceofsexbaseddisparityinbreastcancer
AT cifcididem predictionmodelsforhormonereceptorstatusinfemalebreastcancerdonotextendtomalesfurtherevidenceofsexbaseddisparityinbreastcancer
AT carrerozunamysitzell predictionmodelsforhormonereceptorstatusinfemalebreastcancerdonotextendtomalesfurtherevidenceofsexbaseddisparityinbreastcancer
AT abueidrasha predictionmodelsforhormonereceptorstatusinfemalebreastcancerdonotextendtomalesfurtherevidenceofsexbaseddisparityinbreastcancer
AT speirsvalerie predictionmodelsforhormonereceptorstatusinfemalebreastcancerdonotextendtomalesfurtherevidenceofsexbaseddisparityinbreastcancer
AT katherjakobnikolas predictionmodelsforhormonereceptorstatusinfemalebreastcancerdonotextendtomalesfurtherevidenceofsexbaseddisparityinbreastcancer