Cargando…

A Study of Drug Utilization Pattern and Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Immunosuppressant Drugs in Patients With Skin Disorders in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bihar

Aims The cost-effective therapy of immunosuppressant drugs in dermatological conditions will not only lead to adherence to rational prescribing but will also increase patient compliance with fewer dropouts due to cost factor. Thus, this study was done to determine and compare the drug utilization pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shakur, Adil A, Ranjan, Raushan K, Sinha, Rajesh, Hameed, Saajid, Mohan, Lalit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10632555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37954626
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.48541
_version_ 1785132603127365632
author Shakur, Adil A
Ranjan, Raushan K
Sinha, Rajesh
Hameed, Saajid
Mohan, Lalit
author_facet Shakur, Adil A
Ranjan, Raushan K
Sinha, Rajesh
Hameed, Saajid
Mohan, Lalit
author_sort Shakur, Adil A
collection PubMed
description Aims The cost-effective therapy of immunosuppressant drugs in dermatological conditions will not only lead to adherence to rational prescribing but will also increase patient compliance with fewer dropouts due to cost factor. Thus, this study was done to determine and compare the drug utilization pattern, prescribed daily dose/defined daily dose (PDD/DDD) defined by WHO, and the cost-effectiveness ratio of different immunosuppressants.  Methods and material Prescriptions for patients with skin disorders prescribed with any one systematic or topical immunosuppressant were collected. The utilization of drugs in different skin disorders was expressed as frequency and percentage. PDD was compared with DDD as per the WHOCC-Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC)/DDD index. The pharmacoeconomic analysis was done using a cost-effectiveness ratio. Statistical analysis Descriptive statistics were used to calculate percentages, frequency, and 95% CI. The cost-effectiveness ratio in terms of SFDs (symptom-free days) was defined as the total cost of the initial antibiotic during the study period divided by the number of SFDs (cost/ SFD) and was expressed as mean±standard deviation, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to determine statistical significance of difference. Results Immunosuppressants were prescribed in 117 (19.12%) prescriptions out of a total of 612 prescriptions. Deflazacort was the most utilized systemic immunosuppressant prescribed in 27.18% of cases and was commonly prescribed for irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) followed by prednisolone and betamethasone. Tacrolimus was the most utilized topical immunosuppressant prescribed in 15.90% of patients and was commonly used for ICD and vitiligo followed by clobetasol and mometasone. Betamethasone, prednisolone, clobetasol, and mometasone had better cost-effectiveness. PDD/DDD of all immunosuppressants was less than one except prednisolone, which had a PDD/DDD ratio of 3.52. Conclusions The cost-effectiveness of steroids has the advantage of providing better patients’ adherence to pharmacotherapy, but over-prescribing could also lead to long-term adverse effects of steroids. Pharmacovigilance research should also incorporate pharmacoeconomic analysis to determine the relation between these two aspects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10632555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106325552023-11-10 A Study of Drug Utilization Pattern and Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Immunosuppressant Drugs in Patients With Skin Disorders in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bihar Shakur, Adil A Ranjan, Raushan K Sinha, Rajesh Hameed, Saajid Mohan, Lalit Cureus Public Health Aims The cost-effective therapy of immunosuppressant drugs in dermatological conditions will not only lead to adherence to rational prescribing but will also increase patient compliance with fewer dropouts due to cost factor. Thus, this study was done to determine and compare the drug utilization pattern, prescribed daily dose/defined daily dose (PDD/DDD) defined by WHO, and the cost-effectiveness ratio of different immunosuppressants.  Methods and material Prescriptions for patients with skin disorders prescribed with any one systematic or topical immunosuppressant were collected. The utilization of drugs in different skin disorders was expressed as frequency and percentage. PDD was compared with DDD as per the WHOCC-Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC)/DDD index. The pharmacoeconomic analysis was done using a cost-effectiveness ratio. Statistical analysis Descriptive statistics were used to calculate percentages, frequency, and 95% CI. The cost-effectiveness ratio in terms of SFDs (symptom-free days) was defined as the total cost of the initial antibiotic during the study period divided by the number of SFDs (cost/ SFD) and was expressed as mean±standard deviation, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to determine statistical significance of difference. Results Immunosuppressants were prescribed in 117 (19.12%) prescriptions out of a total of 612 prescriptions. Deflazacort was the most utilized systemic immunosuppressant prescribed in 27.18% of cases and was commonly prescribed for irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) followed by prednisolone and betamethasone. Tacrolimus was the most utilized topical immunosuppressant prescribed in 15.90% of patients and was commonly used for ICD and vitiligo followed by clobetasol and mometasone. Betamethasone, prednisolone, clobetasol, and mometasone had better cost-effectiveness. PDD/DDD of all immunosuppressants was less than one except prednisolone, which had a PDD/DDD ratio of 3.52. Conclusions The cost-effectiveness of steroids has the advantage of providing better patients’ adherence to pharmacotherapy, but over-prescribing could also lead to long-term adverse effects of steroids. Pharmacovigilance research should also incorporate pharmacoeconomic analysis to determine the relation between these two aspects. Cureus 2023-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10632555/ /pubmed/37954626 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.48541 Text en Copyright © 2023, Shakur et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Public Health
Shakur, Adil A
Ranjan, Raushan K
Sinha, Rajesh
Hameed, Saajid
Mohan, Lalit
A Study of Drug Utilization Pattern and Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Immunosuppressant Drugs in Patients With Skin Disorders in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bihar
title A Study of Drug Utilization Pattern and Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Immunosuppressant Drugs in Patients With Skin Disorders in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bihar
title_full A Study of Drug Utilization Pattern and Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Immunosuppressant Drugs in Patients With Skin Disorders in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bihar
title_fullStr A Study of Drug Utilization Pattern and Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Immunosuppressant Drugs in Patients With Skin Disorders in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bihar
title_full_unstemmed A Study of Drug Utilization Pattern and Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Immunosuppressant Drugs in Patients With Skin Disorders in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bihar
title_short A Study of Drug Utilization Pattern and Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Immunosuppressant Drugs in Patients With Skin Disorders in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bihar
title_sort study of drug utilization pattern and pharmacoeconomic analysis of immunosuppressant drugs in patients with skin disorders in a tertiary care hospital in bihar
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10632555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37954626
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.48541
work_keys_str_mv AT shakuradila astudyofdrugutilizationpatternandpharmacoeconomicanalysisofimmunosuppressantdrugsinpatientswithskindisordersinatertiarycarehospitalinbihar
AT ranjanraushank astudyofdrugutilizationpatternandpharmacoeconomicanalysisofimmunosuppressantdrugsinpatientswithskindisordersinatertiarycarehospitalinbihar
AT sinharajesh astudyofdrugutilizationpatternandpharmacoeconomicanalysisofimmunosuppressantdrugsinpatientswithskindisordersinatertiarycarehospitalinbihar
AT hameedsaajid astudyofdrugutilizationpatternandpharmacoeconomicanalysisofimmunosuppressantdrugsinpatientswithskindisordersinatertiarycarehospitalinbihar
AT mohanlalit astudyofdrugutilizationpatternandpharmacoeconomicanalysisofimmunosuppressantdrugsinpatientswithskindisordersinatertiarycarehospitalinbihar
AT shakuradila studyofdrugutilizationpatternandpharmacoeconomicanalysisofimmunosuppressantdrugsinpatientswithskindisordersinatertiarycarehospitalinbihar
AT ranjanraushank studyofdrugutilizationpatternandpharmacoeconomicanalysisofimmunosuppressantdrugsinpatientswithskindisordersinatertiarycarehospitalinbihar
AT sinharajesh studyofdrugutilizationpatternandpharmacoeconomicanalysisofimmunosuppressantdrugsinpatientswithskindisordersinatertiarycarehospitalinbihar
AT hameedsaajid studyofdrugutilizationpatternandpharmacoeconomicanalysisofimmunosuppressantdrugsinpatientswithskindisordersinatertiarycarehospitalinbihar
AT mohanlalit studyofdrugutilizationpatternandpharmacoeconomicanalysisofimmunosuppressantdrugsinpatientswithskindisordersinatertiarycarehospitalinbihar