Cargando…

Development of a set of quality indicators in paediatric and perinatal care in Japan with a modified Delphi method

BACKGROUNDS: Few paediatric and perinatal quality indicators (QIs) have been developed in the Japanese setting, and the quality of care is not assured or validated. The aim of this study was to develop QIs in paediatric and perinatal care in Japan using an administrative database and confirm the fea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shinjo, Daisuke, Ozawa, Nobuaki, Nakadate, Naoya, Kanamori, Yutaka, Matsumoto, Kimikazu, Noguchi, Takashi, Ohtera, Shosuke, Kato, Hitoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10632888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37940343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002209
_version_ 1785132666958381056
author Shinjo, Daisuke
Ozawa, Nobuaki
Nakadate, Naoya
Kanamori, Yutaka
Matsumoto, Kimikazu
Noguchi, Takashi
Ohtera, Shosuke
Kato, Hitoshi
author_facet Shinjo, Daisuke
Ozawa, Nobuaki
Nakadate, Naoya
Kanamori, Yutaka
Matsumoto, Kimikazu
Noguchi, Takashi
Ohtera, Shosuke
Kato, Hitoshi
author_sort Shinjo, Daisuke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUNDS: Few paediatric and perinatal quality indicators (QIs) have been developed in the Japanese setting, and the quality of care is not assured or validated. The aim of this study was to develop QIs in paediatric and perinatal care in Japan using an administrative database and confirm the feasibility and applicability of the indicators using a single-site practice test. METHODS: We used a RAND-modified Delphi method that integrates evidence review with expert consensus development. QI candidates were generated from clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) available in English or Japanese and existing QIs in nine selected paediatric or perinatal conditions. Consensus building was based on independent panel ratings. The performance of QIs was retrospectively assessed using data from an administrative database at the National Children’s Hospital. Data between April 2018 and March 2019 were used, while data between April 2019 and March 2021 were also used for selected condition, considering the small number of patients. Each QI was calculated as follows: number of times the indicator was met/number of participants×100. RESULTS: From the literature review conducted between 2010 and 2020, 124 CPGs and 193 existing indicators were identified to generate QI candidates. Through the consensus-building process, 133 QI candidates were assessed and 79 QIs were accepted. The practice test revealed wide variations in the process-level performance of QIs in four categories: patient safety: median 43.9% (IQR 16.7%–85.6%), general paediatrics: median 98.8% (IQR 84.2%–100%), advanced paediatrics: median 94.4% (IQR 46.0%–100%) and advanced obstetrics: median 80.3% (IQR 59.6%–100%). CONCLUSIONS: We established 79 QIs for paediatric and perinatal care in Japan using an administrative database that can be applied to hospitals nationwide. The practice test confirmed the measurability of the developed QIs. Benchmarking these QIs will be an attractive approach to improving the quality of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10632888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106328882023-11-10 Development of a set of quality indicators in paediatric and perinatal care in Japan with a modified Delphi method Shinjo, Daisuke Ozawa, Nobuaki Nakadate, Naoya Kanamori, Yutaka Matsumoto, Kimikazu Noguchi, Takashi Ohtera, Shosuke Kato, Hitoshi BMJ Paediatr Open Epidemiology BACKGROUNDS: Few paediatric and perinatal quality indicators (QIs) have been developed in the Japanese setting, and the quality of care is not assured or validated. The aim of this study was to develop QIs in paediatric and perinatal care in Japan using an administrative database and confirm the feasibility and applicability of the indicators using a single-site practice test. METHODS: We used a RAND-modified Delphi method that integrates evidence review with expert consensus development. QI candidates were generated from clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) available in English or Japanese and existing QIs in nine selected paediatric or perinatal conditions. Consensus building was based on independent panel ratings. The performance of QIs was retrospectively assessed using data from an administrative database at the National Children’s Hospital. Data between April 2018 and March 2019 were used, while data between April 2019 and March 2021 were also used for selected condition, considering the small number of patients. Each QI was calculated as follows: number of times the indicator was met/number of participants×100. RESULTS: From the literature review conducted between 2010 and 2020, 124 CPGs and 193 existing indicators were identified to generate QI candidates. Through the consensus-building process, 133 QI candidates were assessed and 79 QIs were accepted. The practice test revealed wide variations in the process-level performance of QIs in four categories: patient safety: median 43.9% (IQR 16.7%–85.6%), general paediatrics: median 98.8% (IQR 84.2%–100%), advanced paediatrics: median 94.4% (IQR 46.0%–100%) and advanced obstetrics: median 80.3% (IQR 59.6%–100%). CONCLUSIONS: We established 79 QIs for paediatric and perinatal care in Japan using an administrative database that can be applied to hospitals nationwide. The practice test confirmed the measurability of the developed QIs. Benchmarking these QIs will be an attractive approach to improving the quality of care. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10632888/ /pubmed/37940343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002209 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Shinjo, Daisuke
Ozawa, Nobuaki
Nakadate, Naoya
Kanamori, Yutaka
Matsumoto, Kimikazu
Noguchi, Takashi
Ohtera, Shosuke
Kato, Hitoshi
Development of a set of quality indicators in paediatric and perinatal care in Japan with a modified Delphi method
title Development of a set of quality indicators in paediatric and perinatal care in Japan with a modified Delphi method
title_full Development of a set of quality indicators in paediatric and perinatal care in Japan with a modified Delphi method
title_fullStr Development of a set of quality indicators in paediatric and perinatal care in Japan with a modified Delphi method
title_full_unstemmed Development of a set of quality indicators in paediatric and perinatal care in Japan with a modified Delphi method
title_short Development of a set of quality indicators in paediatric and perinatal care in Japan with a modified Delphi method
title_sort development of a set of quality indicators in paediatric and perinatal care in japan with a modified delphi method
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10632888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37940343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002209
work_keys_str_mv AT shinjodaisuke developmentofasetofqualityindicatorsinpaediatricandperinatalcareinjapanwithamodifieddelphimethod
AT ozawanobuaki developmentofasetofqualityindicatorsinpaediatricandperinatalcareinjapanwithamodifieddelphimethod
AT nakadatenaoya developmentofasetofqualityindicatorsinpaediatricandperinatalcareinjapanwithamodifieddelphimethod
AT kanamoriyutaka developmentofasetofqualityindicatorsinpaediatricandperinatalcareinjapanwithamodifieddelphimethod
AT matsumotokimikazu developmentofasetofqualityindicatorsinpaediatricandperinatalcareinjapanwithamodifieddelphimethod
AT noguchitakashi developmentofasetofqualityindicatorsinpaediatricandperinatalcareinjapanwithamodifieddelphimethod
AT ohterashosuke developmentofasetofqualityindicatorsinpaediatricandperinatalcareinjapanwithamodifieddelphimethod
AT katohitoshi developmentofasetofqualityindicatorsinpaediatricandperinatalcareinjapanwithamodifieddelphimethod