Cargando…

Interconception care in Australian general practice: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: GPs provide care for women across the lifespan. This care currently includes preconception and postpartum phases of a woman’s life. Interconception care (ICC) addresses women’s health issues between pregnancies that then have impact on maternal and infant outcomes, such as lifestyle and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: James, Sharon, Watson, Cathy, Bernard, Elodie, Rathnasekara, Greasha K, Mazza, Danielle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10633660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37903638
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0624
_version_ 1785146166607872000
author James, Sharon
Watson, Cathy
Bernard, Elodie
Rathnasekara, Greasha K
Mazza, Danielle
author_facet James, Sharon
Watson, Cathy
Bernard, Elodie
Rathnasekara, Greasha K
Mazza, Danielle
author_sort James, Sharon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: GPs provide care for women across the lifespan. This care currently includes preconception and postpartum phases of a woman’s life. Interconception care (ICC) addresses women’s health issues between pregnancies that then have impact on maternal and infant outcomes, such as lifestyle and biomedical risks, interpregnancy intervals, and contraception provision. However, ICC in general practice is not well established. AIM: To explore GP perspectives about ICC. DESIGN AND SETTING: Qualitative interviews were undertaken with GPs between May and July 2018. METHOD: Eighteen GPs were purposively recruited from South–Eastern Australia. Audiorecorded semi- structured interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically using the Framework Method. RESULTS: Most participants were unfamiliar with the concept of ICC. Delivery was mainly opportunistic, depending on the woman’s presenting need. Rather than a distinct and required intervention, participants conceptualised components of ICC as forming part of routine practice. GPs described many challenges including lack of clarity about recommended ICC content and timing, lack of engagement and perceived value from mothers, and time constraints during consultations. Facilitators included care continuity and the availability of patient education material. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate that ICC is not a familiar concept for GPs, who feel that they have limited capacity to deliver such care. Further research to evaluate patient perspectives and potential models of care is required before ICC improvements can be developed, trialled, and evaluated. These models could include the colocation of multidisciplinary services and services in combination with well-child visits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10633660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106336602023-12-01 Interconception care in Australian general practice: a qualitative study James, Sharon Watson, Cathy Bernard, Elodie Rathnasekara, Greasha K Mazza, Danielle Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: GPs provide care for women across the lifespan. This care currently includes preconception and postpartum phases of a woman’s life. Interconception care (ICC) addresses women’s health issues between pregnancies that then have impact on maternal and infant outcomes, such as lifestyle and biomedical risks, interpregnancy intervals, and contraception provision. However, ICC in general practice is not well established. AIM: To explore GP perspectives about ICC. DESIGN AND SETTING: Qualitative interviews were undertaken with GPs between May and July 2018. METHOD: Eighteen GPs were purposively recruited from South–Eastern Australia. Audiorecorded semi- structured interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically using the Framework Method. RESULTS: Most participants were unfamiliar with the concept of ICC. Delivery was mainly opportunistic, depending on the woman’s presenting need. Rather than a distinct and required intervention, participants conceptualised components of ICC as forming part of routine practice. GPs described many challenges including lack of clarity about recommended ICC content and timing, lack of engagement and perceived value from mothers, and time constraints during consultations. Facilitators included care continuity and the availability of patient education material. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate that ICC is not a familiar concept for GPs, who feel that they have limited capacity to deliver such care. Further research to evaluate patient perspectives and potential models of care is required before ICC improvements can be developed, trialled, and evaluated. These models could include the colocation of multidisciplinary services and services in combination with well-child visits. Royal College of General Practitioners 2023-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10633660/ /pubmed/37903638 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0624 Text en © The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Research
James, Sharon
Watson, Cathy
Bernard, Elodie
Rathnasekara, Greasha K
Mazza, Danielle
Interconception care in Australian general practice: a qualitative study
title Interconception care in Australian general practice: a qualitative study
title_full Interconception care in Australian general practice: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Interconception care in Australian general practice: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Interconception care in Australian general practice: a qualitative study
title_short Interconception care in Australian general practice: a qualitative study
title_sort interconception care in australian general practice: a qualitative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10633660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37903638
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0624
work_keys_str_mv AT jamessharon interconceptioncareinaustraliangeneralpracticeaqualitativestudy
AT watsoncathy interconceptioncareinaustraliangeneralpracticeaqualitativestudy
AT bernardelodie interconceptioncareinaustraliangeneralpracticeaqualitativestudy
AT rathnasekaragreashak interconceptioncareinaustraliangeneralpracticeaqualitativestudy
AT mazzadanielle interconceptioncareinaustraliangeneralpracticeaqualitativestudy