Cargando…
Interconception care in Australian general practice: a qualitative study
BACKGROUND: GPs provide care for women across the lifespan. This care currently includes preconception and postpartum phases of a woman’s life. Interconception care (ICC) addresses women’s health issues between pregnancies that then have impact on maternal and infant outcomes, such as lifestyle and...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of General Practitioners
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10633660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37903638 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0624 |
_version_ | 1785146166607872000 |
---|---|
author | James, Sharon Watson, Cathy Bernard, Elodie Rathnasekara, Greasha K Mazza, Danielle |
author_facet | James, Sharon Watson, Cathy Bernard, Elodie Rathnasekara, Greasha K Mazza, Danielle |
author_sort | James, Sharon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: GPs provide care for women across the lifespan. This care currently includes preconception and postpartum phases of a woman’s life. Interconception care (ICC) addresses women’s health issues between pregnancies that then have impact on maternal and infant outcomes, such as lifestyle and biomedical risks, interpregnancy intervals, and contraception provision. However, ICC in general practice is not well established. AIM: To explore GP perspectives about ICC. DESIGN AND SETTING: Qualitative interviews were undertaken with GPs between May and July 2018. METHOD: Eighteen GPs were purposively recruited from South–Eastern Australia. Audiorecorded semi- structured interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically using the Framework Method. RESULTS: Most participants were unfamiliar with the concept of ICC. Delivery was mainly opportunistic, depending on the woman’s presenting need. Rather than a distinct and required intervention, participants conceptualised components of ICC as forming part of routine practice. GPs described many challenges including lack of clarity about recommended ICC content and timing, lack of engagement and perceived value from mothers, and time constraints during consultations. Facilitators included care continuity and the availability of patient education material. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate that ICC is not a familiar concept for GPs, who feel that they have limited capacity to deliver such care. Further research to evaluate patient perspectives and potential models of care is required before ICC improvements can be developed, trialled, and evaluated. These models could include the colocation of multidisciplinary services and services in combination with well-child visits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10633660 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Royal College of General Practitioners |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106336602023-12-01 Interconception care in Australian general practice: a qualitative study James, Sharon Watson, Cathy Bernard, Elodie Rathnasekara, Greasha K Mazza, Danielle Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: GPs provide care for women across the lifespan. This care currently includes preconception and postpartum phases of a woman’s life. Interconception care (ICC) addresses women’s health issues between pregnancies that then have impact on maternal and infant outcomes, such as lifestyle and biomedical risks, interpregnancy intervals, and contraception provision. However, ICC in general practice is not well established. AIM: To explore GP perspectives about ICC. DESIGN AND SETTING: Qualitative interviews were undertaken with GPs between May and July 2018. METHOD: Eighteen GPs were purposively recruited from South–Eastern Australia. Audiorecorded semi- structured interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically using the Framework Method. RESULTS: Most participants were unfamiliar with the concept of ICC. Delivery was mainly opportunistic, depending on the woman’s presenting need. Rather than a distinct and required intervention, participants conceptualised components of ICC as forming part of routine practice. GPs described many challenges including lack of clarity about recommended ICC content and timing, lack of engagement and perceived value from mothers, and time constraints during consultations. Facilitators included care continuity and the availability of patient education material. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate that ICC is not a familiar concept for GPs, who feel that they have limited capacity to deliver such care. Further research to evaluate patient perspectives and potential models of care is required before ICC improvements can be developed, trialled, and evaluated. These models could include the colocation of multidisciplinary services and services in combination with well-child visits. Royal College of General Practitioners 2023-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10633660/ /pubmed/37903638 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0624 Text en © The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Research James, Sharon Watson, Cathy Bernard, Elodie Rathnasekara, Greasha K Mazza, Danielle Interconception care in Australian general practice: a qualitative study |
title | Interconception care in Australian general practice: a qualitative study |
title_full | Interconception care in Australian general practice: a qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Interconception care in Australian general practice: a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Interconception care in Australian general practice: a qualitative study |
title_short | Interconception care in Australian general practice: a qualitative study |
title_sort | interconception care in australian general practice: a qualitative study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10633660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37903638 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2022.0624 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jamessharon interconceptioncareinaustraliangeneralpracticeaqualitativestudy AT watsoncathy interconceptioncareinaustraliangeneralpracticeaqualitativestudy AT bernardelodie interconceptioncareinaustraliangeneralpracticeaqualitativestudy AT rathnasekaragreashak interconceptioncareinaustraliangeneralpracticeaqualitativestudy AT mazzadanielle interconceptioncareinaustraliangeneralpracticeaqualitativestudy |