Cargando…

Cardiac protective techniques in left breast radiotherapy: rapid selection criteria for routine clinical decision making

OBJECTIVE: In left breast radiotherapy (RT) desired heart doses may be achieved without heart-sparing RT techniques in some patients. We aimed to examine the existence of predictive factors and cutoff points to determine which patients are the main candidates for heart-sparing RT techniques. MATERIA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirli Bolukbas, Meltem, Karaca, Sibel, Coskun, Volkan, Kocak Uzel, Esengul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10633921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37941070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01470-3
_version_ 1785132716132401152
author Kirli Bolukbas, Meltem
Karaca, Sibel
Coskun, Volkan
Kocak Uzel, Esengul
author_facet Kirli Bolukbas, Meltem
Karaca, Sibel
Coskun, Volkan
Kocak Uzel, Esengul
author_sort Kirli Bolukbas, Meltem
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: In left breast radiotherapy (RT) desired heart doses may be achieved without heart-sparing RT techniques in some patients. We aimed to examine the existence of predictive factors and cutoff points to determine which patients are the main candidates for heart-sparing RT techniques. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Dosimetric data for left breast cancer was examined. RT plans were made at conventional doses to the breast and peripheral lymph nodes. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 22.0 (SPSS Inc., IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). RESULT: 114 cases were evaluated by ROC (Receiver operating characteristic) analysis in the breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy groups. While only left lung volume (AUC: 0.74, 95% CI 0.61–0.87, p = 0.002) was significant in BCS cases, in cases with mastectomy, left lung volume (AUC: 0.81, 95% CI 0.69–0.94, p = 0.002) and lung/heart volume ratio (AUC: 0.83, 95% CI 0.70–0.96, p = 0.001) had a significant relationship with the relevance of heart doses. The cutoff point of 1.92 was selected for the lung/heart volume ratio for the mastectomized patients. Moreover, the cutoff point 1154 cc and 1208 cc was determined for the left lung volume for the BCS and mastectomized patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Various cutoff points in left breast RT can be used to predict whether RT plans will meet QUANTEC (Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic) heart dose limits. Evaluating only these few cutoff points before planning makes it possible to eliminate 70% of patients with BCS and 40% of patients with mastectomy from respiratory-controlled methods, which require time and effort. Patients with lung volume and lung/heart volume ratio smaller than the cutoff values can be considered primary candidates for heart-sparing techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10633921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106339212023-11-10 Cardiac protective techniques in left breast radiotherapy: rapid selection criteria for routine clinical decision making Kirli Bolukbas, Meltem Karaca, Sibel Coskun, Volkan Kocak Uzel, Esengul Eur J Med Res Research OBJECTIVE: In left breast radiotherapy (RT) desired heart doses may be achieved without heart-sparing RT techniques in some patients. We aimed to examine the existence of predictive factors and cutoff points to determine which patients are the main candidates for heart-sparing RT techniques. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Dosimetric data for left breast cancer was examined. RT plans were made at conventional doses to the breast and peripheral lymph nodes. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 22.0 (SPSS Inc., IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). RESULT: 114 cases were evaluated by ROC (Receiver operating characteristic) analysis in the breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy groups. While only left lung volume (AUC: 0.74, 95% CI 0.61–0.87, p = 0.002) was significant in BCS cases, in cases with mastectomy, left lung volume (AUC: 0.81, 95% CI 0.69–0.94, p = 0.002) and lung/heart volume ratio (AUC: 0.83, 95% CI 0.70–0.96, p = 0.001) had a significant relationship with the relevance of heart doses. The cutoff point of 1.92 was selected for the lung/heart volume ratio for the mastectomized patients. Moreover, the cutoff point 1154 cc and 1208 cc was determined for the left lung volume for the BCS and mastectomized patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Various cutoff points in left breast RT can be used to predict whether RT plans will meet QUANTEC (Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic) heart dose limits. Evaluating only these few cutoff points before planning makes it possible to eliminate 70% of patients with BCS and 40% of patients with mastectomy from respiratory-controlled methods, which require time and effort. Patients with lung volume and lung/heart volume ratio smaller than the cutoff values can be considered primary candidates for heart-sparing techniques. BioMed Central 2023-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10633921/ /pubmed/37941070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01470-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kirli Bolukbas, Meltem
Karaca, Sibel
Coskun, Volkan
Kocak Uzel, Esengul
Cardiac protective techniques in left breast radiotherapy: rapid selection criteria for routine clinical decision making
title Cardiac protective techniques in left breast radiotherapy: rapid selection criteria for routine clinical decision making
title_full Cardiac protective techniques in left breast radiotherapy: rapid selection criteria for routine clinical decision making
title_fullStr Cardiac protective techniques in left breast radiotherapy: rapid selection criteria for routine clinical decision making
title_full_unstemmed Cardiac protective techniques in left breast radiotherapy: rapid selection criteria for routine clinical decision making
title_short Cardiac protective techniques in left breast radiotherapy: rapid selection criteria for routine clinical decision making
title_sort cardiac protective techniques in left breast radiotherapy: rapid selection criteria for routine clinical decision making
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10633921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37941070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01470-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kirlibolukbasmeltem cardiacprotectivetechniquesinleftbreastradiotherapyrapidselectioncriteriaforroutineclinicaldecisionmaking
AT karacasibel cardiacprotectivetechniquesinleftbreastradiotherapyrapidselectioncriteriaforroutineclinicaldecisionmaking
AT coskunvolkan cardiacprotectivetechniquesinleftbreastradiotherapyrapidselectioncriteriaforroutineclinicaldecisionmaking
AT kocakuzelesengul cardiacprotectivetechniquesinleftbreastradiotherapyrapidselectioncriteriaforroutineclinicaldecisionmaking