Cargando…

One hundred years of neurosciences in the arts and humanities, a bibliometric review

BACKGROUND: Neuroscientific approaches have historically triggered changes in the conception of creativity and artistic experience, which can be revealed by noting the intersection of these fields of study in terms of variables such as global trends, methodologies, objects of study, or application o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cebral-Loureda, Manuel, Sanabria-Z, Jorge, Ramírez-Moreno, Mauricio A., Kaminsky-Castillo, Irina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10633938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37946225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13010-023-00147-3
_version_ 1785132720278470656
author Cebral-Loureda, Manuel
Sanabria-Z, Jorge
Ramírez-Moreno, Mauricio A.
Kaminsky-Castillo, Irina
author_facet Cebral-Loureda, Manuel
Sanabria-Z, Jorge
Ramírez-Moreno, Mauricio A.
Kaminsky-Castillo, Irina
author_sort Cebral-Loureda, Manuel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neuroscientific approaches have historically triggered changes in the conception of creativity and artistic experience, which can be revealed by noting the intersection of these fields of study in terms of variables such as global trends, methodologies, objects of study, or application of new technologies; however, these neuroscientific approaches are still often considered as disciplines detached from the arts and humanities. In this light, the question arises as to what evidence the history of neurotechnologies provides at the intersection of creativity and aesthetic experience. METHODS: We conducted a century-long bibliometric analysis of key parameters in multidisciplinary studies published in the Scopus database. Screening techniques based on the PRISMA method and advanced data analysis techniques were applied to 3612 documents metadata from the years 1922 to 2022. We made graphical representations of the results applying algorithmic and clusterization processes to keywords and authors relationships. RESULTS: From the analyses, we found a) a shift from a personality-focus quantitative analysis to a field-focus qualitative approach, considering topics such as art, perception, aesthetics and beauty; b) The locus of interest in fMRI-supported neuroanatomy has been shifting toward EEG technologies and models based on machine learning and deep learning in recent years; c) four main clusters were identified in the study approaches: humanistic, creative, neuroaesthetic and medical; d) the neuroaesthetics cluster is the most central and relevant, mediating between creativity and neuroscience; e) neuroaesthetics and neuroethics are two of the neologism that better characterizes the challenges that this convergence of studies will have in the next years. CONCLUSIONS: Through a longitudinal analysis, we evidenced the great influence that neuroscience is having on the thematic direction of the arts and humanities. The perspective presented shows how this field is being consolidated and helps to define it as a new opportunity of great potential for future researchers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10633938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106339382023-11-10 One hundred years of neurosciences in the arts and humanities, a bibliometric review Cebral-Loureda, Manuel Sanabria-Z, Jorge Ramírez-Moreno, Mauricio A. Kaminsky-Castillo, Irina Philos Ethics Humanit Med Review BACKGROUND: Neuroscientific approaches have historically triggered changes in the conception of creativity and artistic experience, which can be revealed by noting the intersection of these fields of study in terms of variables such as global trends, methodologies, objects of study, or application of new technologies; however, these neuroscientific approaches are still often considered as disciplines detached from the arts and humanities. In this light, the question arises as to what evidence the history of neurotechnologies provides at the intersection of creativity and aesthetic experience. METHODS: We conducted a century-long bibliometric analysis of key parameters in multidisciplinary studies published in the Scopus database. Screening techniques based on the PRISMA method and advanced data analysis techniques were applied to 3612 documents metadata from the years 1922 to 2022. We made graphical representations of the results applying algorithmic and clusterization processes to keywords and authors relationships. RESULTS: From the analyses, we found a) a shift from a personality-focus quantitative analysis to a field-focus qualitative approach, considering topics such as art, perception, aesthetics and beauty; b) The locus of interest in fMRI-supported neuroanatomy has been shifting toward EEG technologies and models based on machine learning and deep learning in recent years; c) four main clusters were identified in the study approaches: humanistic, creative, neuroaesthetic and medical; d) the neuroaesthetics cluster is the most central and relevant, mediating between creativity and neuroscience; e) neuroaesthetics and neuroethics are two of the neologism that better characterizes the challenges that this convergence of studies will have in the next years. CONCLUSIONS: Through a longitudinal analysis, we evidenced the great influence that neuroscience is having on the thematic direction of the arts and humanities. The perspective presented shows how this field is being consolidated and helps to define it as a new opportunity of great potential for future researchers. BioMed Central 2023-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10633938/ /pubmed/37946225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13010-023-00147-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Cebral-Loureda, Manuel
Sanabria-Z, Jorge
Ramírez-Moreno, Mauricio A.
Kaminsky-Castillo, Irina
One hundred years of neurosciences in the arts and humanities, a bibliometric review
title One hundred years of neurosciences in the arts and humanities, a bibliometric review
title_full One hundred years of neurosciences in the arts and humanities, a bibliometric review
title_fullStr One hundred years of neurosciences in the arts and humanities, a bibliometric review
title_full_unstemmed One hundred years of neurosciences in the arts and humanities, a bibliometric review
title_short One hundred years of neurosciences in the arts and humanities, a bibliometric review
title_sort one hundred years of neurosciences in the arts and humanities, a bibliometric review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10633938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37946225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13010-023-00147-3
work_keys_str_mv AT cebrallouredamanuel onehundredyearsofneurosciencesintheartsandhumanitiesabibliometricreview
AT sanabriazjorge onehundredyearsofneurosciencesintheartsandhumanitiesabibliometricreview
AT ramirezmorenomauricioa onehundredyearsofneurosciencesintheartsandhumanitiesabibliometricreview
AT kaminskycastilloirina onehundredyearsofneurosciencesintheartsandhumanitiesabibliometricreview