Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of therapies for COVID-19 in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Clinical evidence suggests that pregnant women are more vulnerable to COVID-19, since they are at increased risk for disease progression and for obstetric complications, such as premature labor, miscarriage, preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, fetal growth restriction and perinatal death. D...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37946100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08747-2 |
_version_ | 1785132736392986624 |
---|---|
author | Di Gennaro, Francesco Guido, Giacomo Frallonardo, Luisa Segala, Francesco Vladimiro De Nola, Rosalba Damiani, Gianluca Raffaello De Vita, Elda Totaro, Valentina Barbagallo, Mario Nicastri, Emanuele Vimercati, Antonella Cicinelli, Ettore Liuzzi, Giuseppina Veronese, Nicola Saracino, Annalisa |
author_facet | Di Gennaro, Francesco Guido, Giacomo Frallonardo, Luisa Segala, Francesco Vladimiro De Nola, Rosalba Damiani, Gianluca Raffaello De Vita, Elda Totaro, Valentina Barbagallo, Mario Nicastri, Emanuele Vimercati, Antonella Cicinelli, Ettore Liuzzi, Giuseppina Veronese, Nicola Saracino, Annalisa |
author_sort | Di Gennaro, Francesco |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical evidence suggests that pregnant women are more vulnerable to COVID-19, since they are at increased risk for disease progression and for obstetric complications, such as premature labor, miscarriage, preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, fetal growth restriction and perinatal death. Despite this evidence, pregnant women are often excluded from clinical trials, resulting in limited knowledge on COVID-19 management. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide better evidence on the efficacy and safety of available COVID-19 treatment in pregnant women. METHODS: Four authors searched major electronic databases from inception until 1 st November-2022 for controlled trials/observational studies, investigating outcomes after the administration of anti-SARS-CoV-2 treatments in pregnant women affected by COVID-19. The analyses investigated the cumulative incidence of delivery and maternal outcomes in pregnant women, comparing those taking active medication vs standard care. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Statistical significance was assessed using the random effects model and inverse-variance method. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the updated 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The protocol has been registered in Prospero (number registration: CRD42023397445). RESULTS: From initially 937 non duplicate records, we assessed the full texts of 40 articles, finally including ten studies. In six studies, including 1627 patients, the use of casirivimab/imdevimab (CAS/IMD), remdesivir, and IFN-alpha 2b significantly decreased the need of cesarean section ((RR = 0.665; 95%CI: 0.491–0.899; p = 0.008; I 2 = 19.5%;) (Table 1, (Fig. 1). Treatments did not decrease the risk of preterm delivery, admission to neonatal ICU, or stillbirth/perinatal loss (p-values > 0.50 for all these outcomes) and did not prevent the progression of disease towards severe degrees (k = 8; 2,374 pregnant women; RR = 0.778; 95%CI: 0.550–1.099; p = 0.15; I 2 = 0%). Moreover, the use of medications during pregnancy did not modify the incidence of maternal death in two studies (Table 2). CONCLUSIONS: To our analysis, CAS/IMD, remdesivir, and IFN alpha 2b reduced the number of cesarean sections but demonstrated no effect on disease progression and other obstetric and COVID-19 related outcomes. The inability to evaluate the influence of viral load on illness development in pregnant women was attributed to lack of data. In our systematic review, no major side effects were reported. Though, it is essential for the medical community to focus more on clinical trials and less on episodic case reports and case series, with standardization of fetal and maternal outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-023-08747-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10634005 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106340052023-11-10 Efficacy and safety of therapies for COVID-19 in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Di Gennaro, Francesco Guido, Giacomo Frallonardo, Luisa Segala, Francesco Vladimiro De Nola, Rosalba Damiani, Gianluca Raffaello De Vita, Elda Totaro, Valentina Barbagallo, Mario Nicastri, Emanuele Vimercati, Antonella Cicinelli, Ettore Liuzzi, Giuseppina Veronese, Nicola Saracino, Annalisa BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: Clinical evidence suggests that pregnant women are more vulnerable to COVID-19, since they are at increased risk for disease progression and for obstetric complications, such as premature labor, miscarriage, preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, fetal growth restriction and perinatal death. Despite this evidence, pregnant women are often excluded from clinical trials, resulting in limited knowledge on COVID-19 management. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide better evidence on the efficacy and safety of available COVID-19 treatment in pregnant women. METHODS: Four authors searched major electronic databases from inception until 1 st November-2022 for controlled trials/observational studies, investigating outcomes after the administration of anti-SARS-CoV-2 treatments in pregnant women affected by COVID-19. The analyses investigated the cumulative incidence of delivery and maternal outcomes in pregnant women, comparing those taking active medication vs standard care. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Statistical significance was assessed using the random effects model and inverse-variance method. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the updated 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The protocol has been registered in Prospero (number registration: CRD42023397445). RESULTS: From initially 937 non duplicate records, we assessed the full texts of 40 articles, finally including ten studies. In six studies, including 1627 patients, the use of casirivimab/imdevimab (CAS/IMD), remdesivir, and IFN-alpha 2b significantly decreased the need of cesarean section ((RR = 0.665; 95%CI: 0.491–0.899; p = 0.008; I 2 = 19.5%;) (Table 1, (Fig. 1). Treatments did not decrease the risk of preterm delivery, admission to neonatal ICU, or stillbirth/perinatal loss (p-values > 0.50 for all these outcomes) and did not prevent the progression of disease towards severe degrees (k = 8; 2,374 pregnant women; RR = 0.778; 95%CI: 0.550–1.099; p = 0.15; I 2 = 0%). Moreover, the use of medications during pregnancy did not modify the incidence of maternal death in two studies (Table 2). CONCLUSIONS: To our analysis, CAS/IMD, remdesivir, and IFN alpha 2b reduced the number of cesarean sections but demonstrated no effect on disease progression and other obstetric and COVID-19 related outcomes. The inability to evaluate the influence of viral load on illness development in pregnant women was attributed to lack of data. In our systematic review, no major side effects were reported. Though, it is essential for the medical community to focus more on clinical trials and less on episodic case reports and case series, with standardization of fetal and maternal outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-023-08747-2. BioMed Central 2023-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10634005/ /pubmed/37946100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08747-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Di Gennaro, Francesco Guido, Giacomo Frallonardo, Luisa Segala, Francesco Vladimiro De Nola, Rosalba Damiani, Gianluca Raffaello De Vita, Elda Totaro, Valentina Barbagallo, Mario Nicastri, Emanuele Vimercati, Antonella Cicinelli, Ettore Liuzzi, Giuseppina Veronese, Nicola Saracino, Annalisa Efficacy and safety of therapies for COVID-19 in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy and safety of therapies for COVID-19 in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of therapies for COVID-19 in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of therapies for COVID-19 in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of therapies for COVID-19 in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of therapies for COVID-19 in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of therapies for covid-19 in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37946100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08747-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT digennarofrancesco efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforcovid19inpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT guidogiacomo efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforcovid19inpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT frallonardoluisa efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforcovid19inpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT segalafrancescovladimiro efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforcovid19inpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT denolarosalba efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforcovid19inpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT damianigianlucaraffaello efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforcovid19inpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT devitaelda efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforcovid19inpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT totarovalentina efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforcovid19inpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT barbagallomario efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforcovid19inpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT nicastriemanuele efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforcovid19inpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vimercatiantonella efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforcovid19inpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT cicinelliettore efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforcovid19inpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuzzigiuseppina efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforcovid19inpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT veronesenicola efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforcovid19inpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT saracinoannalisa efficacyandsafetyoftherapiesforcovid19inpregnancyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |