Cargando…
Adapting and implementing breast cancer follow-up in primary care: protocol for a mixed methods hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized study
BACKGROUND: Advances in detection and treatment for breast cancer have led to an increase in the number of individuals managing significant late and long-term treatment effects. Primary care has a role in caring for patients with a history of cancer, yet there is little guidance on how to effectivel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37946132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02186-3 |
_version_ | 1785132751176859648 |
---|---|
author | Fadem, Sarah J. Crabtree, Benjamin F. O’Malley, Denalee M. Mikesell, Lisa Ferrante, Jeanne M. Toppmeyer, Deborah L. Ohman-Strickland, Pamela A. Hemler, Jennifer R. Howard, Jenna Bator, Alicja April-Sanders, Ayana Kurtzman, Rachel Hudson, Shawna V. |
author_facet | Fadem, Sarah J. Crabtree, Benjamin F. O’Malley, Denalee M. Mikesell, Lisa Ferrante, Jeanne M. Toppmeyer, Deborah L. Ohman-Strickland, Pamela A. Hemler, Jennifer R. Howard, Jenna Bator, Alicja April-Sanders, Ayana Kurtzman, Rachel Hudson, Shawna V. |
author_sort | Fadem, Sarah J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Advances in detection and treatment for breast cancer have led to an increase in the number of individuals managing significant late and long-term treatment effects. Primary care has a role in caring for patients with a history of cancer, yet there is little guidance on how to effectively implement survivorship care evidence into primary care delivery. METHODS: This protocol describes a multi-phase, mixed methods, stakeholder-driven research process that prioritizes actionable, evidence-based primary care improvements to enhance breast cancer survivorship care by integrating implementation and primary care transformation frameworks: the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework and the Practice Change Model (PCM). Informed by depth interviews and a four round Delphi panel with diverse stakeholders from primary care and oncology, we will implement and evaluate an iterative clinical intervention in a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized design in twenty-six primary care practices. Multi-component implementation strategies will include facilitation, audit and feedback, and learning collaboratives. Ongoing data collection and analysis will be performed to optimize adoption of the intervention. The primary clinical outcome to test effectiveness is comprehensive breast cancer follow-up care. Implementation will be assessed using mixed methods to explore how organizational and contextual variables affect adoption, implementation, and early sustainability for provision of follow-up care, symptom, and risk management activities at six- and 12-months post implementation. DISCUSSION: Study findings are poised to inform development of scalable, high impact intervention processes to enhance long-term follow-up care for patients with a history of breast cancer in primary care. If successful, next steps would include working with a national primary care practice-based research network to implement a national dissemination study. Actionable activities and processes identified could also be applied to development of organizational and care delivery interventions for follow-up care for other cancer sites. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on June 2, 2022: NCT05400941. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-023-02186-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10634067 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106340672023-11-10 Adapting and implementing breast cancer follow-up in primary care: protocol for a mixed methods hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized study Fadem, Sarah J. Crabtree, Benjamin F. O’Malley, Denalee M. Mikesell, Lisa Ferrante, Jeanne M. Toppmeyer, Deborah L. Ohman-Strickland, Pamela A. Hemler, Jennifer R. Howard, Jenna Bator, Alicja April-Sanders, Ayana Kurtzman, Rachel Hudson, Shawna V. BMC Prim Care Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Advances in detection and treatment for breast cancer have led to an increase in the number of individuals managing significant late and long-term treatment effects. Primary care has a role in caring for patients with a history of cancer, yet there is little guidance on how to effectively implement survivorship care evidence into primary care delivery. METHODS: This protocol describes a multi-phase, mixed methods, stakeholder-driven research process that prioritizes actionable, evidence-based primary care improvements to enhance breast cancer survivorship care by integrating implementation and primary care transformation frameworks: the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework and the Practice Change Model (PCM). Informed by depth interviews and a four round Delphi panel with diverse stakeholders from primary care and oncology, we will implement and evaluate an iterative clinical intervention in a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized design in twenty-six primary care practices. Multi-component implementation strategies will include facilitation, audit and feedback, and learning collaboratives. Ongoing data collection and analysis will be performed to optimize adoption of the intervention. The primary clinical outcome to test effectiveness is comprehensive breast cancer follow-up care. Implementation will be assessed using mixed methods to explore how organizational and contextual variables affect adoption, implementation, and early sustainability for provision of follow-up care, symptom, and risk management activities at six- and 12-months post implementation. DISCUSSION: Study findings are poised to inform development of scalable, high impact intervention processes to enhance long-term follow-up care for patients with a history of breast cancer in primary care. If successful, next steps would include working with a national primary care practice-based research network to implement a national dissemination study. Actionable activities and processes identified could also be applied to development of organizational and care delivery interventions for follow-up care for other cancer sites. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on June 2, 2022: NCT05400941. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-023-02186-3. BioMed Central 2023-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10634067/ /pubmed/37946132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02186-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Fadem, Sarah J. Crabtree, Benjamin F. O’Malley, Denalee M. Mikesell, Lisa Ferrante, Jeanne M. Toppmeyer, Deborah L. Ohman-Strickland, Pamela A. Hemler, Jennifer R. Howard, Jenna Bator, Alicja April-Sanders, Ayana Kurtzman, Rachel Hudson, Shawna V. Adapting and implementing breast cancer follow-up in primary care: protocol for a mixed methods hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized study |
title | Adapting and implementing breast cancer follow-up in primary care: protocol for a mixed methods hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized study |
title_full | Adapting and implementing breast cancer follow-up in primary care: protocol for a mixed methods hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized study |
title_fullStr | Adapting and implementing breast cancer follow-up in primary care: protocol for a mixed methods hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized study |
title_full_unstemmed | Adapting and implementing breast cancer follow-up in primary care: protocol for a mixed methods hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized study |
title_short | Adapting and implementing breast cancer follow-up in primary care: protocol for a mixed methods hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized study |
title_sort | adapting and implementing breast cancer follow-up in primary care: protocol for a mixed methods hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized study |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37946132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02186-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fademsarahj adaptingandimplementingbreastcancerfollowupinprimarycareprotocolforamixedmethodshybridtype1effectivenessimplementationclusterrandomizedstudy AT crabtreebenjaminf adaptingandimplementingbreastcancerfollowupinprimarycareprotocolforamixedmethodshybridtype1effectivenessimplementationclusterrandomizedstudy AT omalleydenaleem adaptingandimplementingbreastcancerfollowupinprimarycareprotocolforamixedmethodshybridtype1effectivenessimplementationclusterrandomizedstudy AT mikeselllisa adaptingandimplementingbreastcancerfollowupinprimarycareprotocolforamixedmethodshybridtype1effectivenessimplementationclusterrandomizedstudy AT ferrantejeannem adaptingandimplementingbreastcancerfollowupinprimarycareprotocolforamixedmethodshybridtype1effectivenessimplementationclusterrandomizedstudy AT toppmeyerdeborahl adaptingandimplementingbreastcancerfollowupinprimarycareprotocolforamixedmethodshybridtype1effectivenessimplementationclusterrandomizedstudy AT ohmanstricklandpamelaa adaptingandimplementingbreastcancerfollowupinprimarycareprotocolforamixedmethodshybridtype1effectivenessimplementationclusterrandomizedstudy AT hemlerjenniferr adaptingandimplementingbreastcancerfollowupinprimarycareprotocolforamixedmethodshybridtype1effectivenessimplementationclusterrandomizedstudy AT howardjenna adaptingandimplementingbreastcancerfollowupinprimarycareprotocolforamixedmethodshybridtype1effectivenessimplementationclusterrandomizedstudy AT batoralicja adaptingandimplementingbreastcancerfollowupinprimarycareprotocolforamixedmethodshybridtype1effectivenessimplementationclusterrandomizedstudy AT aprilsandersayana adaptingandimplementingbreastcancerfollowupinprimarycareprotocolforamixedmethodshybridtype1effectivenessimplementationclusterrandomizedstudy AT kurtzmanrachel adaptingandimplementingbreastcancerfollowupinprimarycareprotocolforamixedmethodshybridtype1effectivenessimplementationclusterrandomizedstudy AT hudsonshawnav adaptingandimplementingbreastcancerfollowupinprimarycareprotocolforamixedmethodshybridtype1effectivenessimplementationclusterrandomizedstudy |