Cargando…

Team experiences of the root cause analysis process after a sentinel event: a qualitative case study

BACKGROUND: Root cause analysis (RCA) is a systematic approach, typically involving several stages, used in healthcare to identify the underlying causes of a medical error or sentinel event. This study focuses on how members of a Norwegian RCA team experience aspects of an RCA process and whether it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liepelt, Silje, Sundal, Hildegunn, Kirchhoff, Ralf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37940969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10178-3
_version_ 1785132763528036352
author Liepelt, Silje
Sundal, Hildegunn
Kirchhoff, Ralf
author_facet Liepelt, Silje
Sundal, Hildegunn
Kirchhoff, Ralf
author_sort Liepelt, Silje
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Root cause analysis (RCA) is a systematic approach, typically involving several stages, used in healthcare to identify the underlying causes of a medical error or sentinel event. This study focuses on how members of a Norwegian RCA team experience aspects of an RCA process and whether it complies with the Norwegian RCA method. METHOD: Based on a sentinel event in which a child died unexpectedly during childbirth in a Norwegian hospital in 2021, the following research questions are addressed: 1. What was the RCA team’s experience of the RCA process? 2. Was there compliance with the Norwegian RCA method in this case? A case study was chosen out of the desire to understand complex social phenomena and to allow in-depth focus on a case. RESULTS: The result covered three main themes. The first theme related to the hospital’s management system and aspects of the case that made it challenging to follow all recommendations in the Norwegian RCA guidelines. The second theme encompassed external and internal assessment. The RCA team was composed of members with methodological and medical expertise. However, the police’s involvement in the case made it complex for the team to carry out the process. The third and final theme covered intrapersonal challenges RCA team members faced. Team members experienced various challenges during the RCA process, including being neutral, dealing with role-related challenges, grappling with ambivalence, and managing the additional time burden and resource constraints. As anticipated in the RCA guidelines, the team’s ability to remain neutral was tested. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study can help stakeholders better comprehend how an inter-professional RCA teamwork intervention can affect a healthcare organization and enhance the teamwork experience of healthcare staff while facilitating improvements in work processes and patient safety. Additionally, these results can guide stakeholders in creating, executing, utilizing, and educating others about RCA processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10634119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106341192023-11-10 Team experiences of the root cause analysis process after a sentinel event: a qualitative case study Liepelt, Silje Sundal, Hildegunn Kirchhoff, Ralf BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Root cause analysis (RCA) is a systematic approach, typically involving several stages, used in healthcare to identify the underlying causes of a medical error or sentinel event. This study focuses on how members of a Norwegian RCA team experience aspects of an RCA process and whether it complies with the Norwegian RCA method. METHOD: Based on a sentinel event in which a child died unexpectedly during childbirth in a Norwegian hospital in 2021, the following research questions are addressed: 1. What was the RCA team’s experience of the RCA process? 2. Was there compliance with the Norwegian RCA method in this case? A case study was chosen out of the desire to understand complex social phenomena and to allow in-depth focus on a case. RESULTS: The result covered three main themes. The first theme related to the hospital’s management system and aspects of the case that made it challenging to follow all recommendations in the Norwegian RCA guidelines. The second theme encompassed external and internal assessment. The RCA team was composed of members with methodological and medical expertise. However, the police’s involvement in the case made it complex for the team to carry out the process. The third and final theme covered intrapersonal challenges RCA team members faced. Team members experienced various challenges during the RCA process, including being neutral, dealing with role-related challenges, grappling with ambivalence, and managing the additional time burden and resource constraints. As anticipated in the RCA guidelines, the team’s ability to remain neutral was tested. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study can help stakeholders better comprehend how an inter-professional RCA teamwork intervention can affect a healthcare organization and enhance the teamwork experience of healthcare staff while facilitating improvements in work processes and patient safety. Additionally, these results can guide stakeholders in creating, executing, utilizing, and educating others about RCA processes. BioMed Central 2023-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10634119/ /pubmed/37940969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10178-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Liepelt, Silje
Sundal, Hildegunn
Kirchhoff, Ralf
Team experiences of the root cause analysis process after a sentinel event: a qualitative case study
title Team experiences of the root cause analysis process after a sentinel event: a qualitative case study
title_full Team experiences of the root cause analysis process after a sentinel event: a qualitative case study
title_fullStr Team experiences of the root cause analysis process after a sentinel event: a qualitative case study
title_full_unstemmed Team experiences of the root cause analysis process after a sentinel event: a qualitative case study
title_short Team experiences of the root cause analysis process after a sentinel event: a qualitative case study
title_sort team experiences of the root cause analysis process after a sentinel event: a qualitative case study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37940969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10178-3
work_keys_str_mv AT liepeltsilje teamexperiencesoftherootcauseanalysisprocessafterasentineleventaqualitativecasestudy
AT sundalhildegunn teamexperiencesoftherootcauseanalysisprocessafterasentineleventaqualitativecasestudy
AT kirchhoffralf teamexperiencesoftherootcauseanalysisprocessafterasentineleventaqualitativecasestudy