Cargando…

To vaccinate or not to vaccinate? The interplay between pro- and against- vaccination reasons

BACKGROUND: By mid 2023, European countries reached 75% of vaccine coverage for COVID-19 and although vaccination rates are quite high, many people are still hesitant. A plethora of studies have investigated factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, however, insufficient attention has been...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caserotti, Marta, Girardi, Paolo, Sellaro, Roberta, Rubaltelli, Enrico, Tasso, Alessandra, Lotto, Lorella, Gavaruzzi, Teresa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37946143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17112-6
_version_ 1785132774149062656
author Caserotti, Marta
Girardi, Paolo
Sellaro, Roberta
Rubaltelli, Enrico
Tasso, Alessandra
Lotto, Lorella
Gavaruzzi, Teresa
author_facet Caserotti, Marta
Girardi, Paolo
Sellaro, Roberta
Rubaltelli, Enrico
Tasso, Alessandra
Lotto, Lorella
Gavaruzzi, Teresa
author_sort Caserotti, Marta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: By mid 2023, European countries reached 75% of vaccine coverage for COVID-19 and although vaccination rates are quite high, many people are still hesitant. A plethora of studies have investigated factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, however, insufficient attention has been paid to the reasons why people get vaccinated against COVID-19. Our work aims to investigate the role of reasons in the decision to get vaccinated against COVID-19 in a representative sample of 1,689 adult Italians (March–April 2021) balanced in terms of age, gender, educational level and area of residence. METHODS: Through an online questionnaire, we asked participants to freely report up to three reasons for and against COVID-19 vaccination, and the weight each had in the decision to get vaccinated. We first investigated the role of emotional competence and COVID-19 risk perception in the generation of both reasons using regression models. Next, we studied the role that the different reasons had in the vaccination decision, considering both the intention to vaccinate (using a beta regression model) and the decision made by the participants who already had the opportunity to get vaccinated (using a logistic regression model). Finally, two different classification tree analyses were carried out to characterize profiles with a low or high willingness to get vaccinated or with a low or high probability to accept/book the vaccine. RESULTS: High emotional competence positively influences the generation of both reasons (ORs > 1.5), whereas high risk perception increases the generation of positive reasons (ORs > 1.4) while decreasing reasons against vaccination (OR = 0.64). As pro-reasons increase, vaccination acceptance increases, while the opposite happens as against-reasons increase (all p < 0.001). One strong reason in favor of vaccines is enough to unbalance the decision toward acceptance of vaccination, even when reasons against it are also present (p < 0.001). Protection and absence of distrust are the reasons that mostly drive willingness to be vaccinated and acceptance of an offered vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Knowing the reasons that drive people’s decision about such an important choice can suggest new communication insights to reduce possible negative reactions toward vaccination and people's hesitancy. Results are discussed considering results of other national and international studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-17112-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10634164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106341642023-11-10 To vaccinate or not to vaccinate? The interplay between pro- and against- vaccination reasons Caserotti, Marta Girardi, Paolo Sellaro, Roberta Rubaltelli, Enrico Tasso, Alessandra Lotto, Lorella Gavaruzzi, Teresa BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: By mid 2023, European countries reached 75% of vaccine coverage for COVID-19 and although vaccination rates are quite high, many people are still hesitant. A plethora of studies have investigated factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, however, insufficient attention has been paid to the reasons why people get vaccinated against COVID-19. Our work aims to investigate the role of reasons in the decision to get vaccinated against COVID-19 in a representative sample of 1,689 adult Italians (March–April 2021) balanced in terms of age, gender, educational level and area of residence. METHODS: Through an online questionnaire, we asked participants to freely report up to three reasons for and against COVID-19 vaccination, and the weight each had in the decision to get vaccinated. We first investigated the role of emotional competence and COVID-19 risk perception in the generation of both reasons using regression models. Next, we studied the role that the different reasons had in the vaccination decision, considering both the intention to vaccinate (using a beta regression model) and the decision made by the participants who already had the opportunity to get vaccinated (using a logistic regression model). Finally, two different classification tree analyses were carried out to characterize profiles with a low or high willingness to get vaccinated or with a low or high probability to accept/book the vaccine. RESULTS: High emotional competence positively influences the generation of both reasons (ORs > 1.5), whereas high risk perception increases the generation of positive reasons (ORs > 1.4) while decreasing reasons against vaccination (OR = 0.64). As pro-reasons increase, vaccination acceptance increases, while the opposite happens as against-reasons increase (all p < 0.001). One strong reason in favor of vaccines is enough to unbalance the decision toward acceptance of vaccination, even when reasons against it are also present (p < 0.001). Protection and absence of distrust are the reasons that mostly drive willingness to be vaccinated and acceptance of an offered vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Knowing the reasons that drive people’s decision about such an important choice can suggest new communication insights to reduce possible negative reactions toward vaccination and people's hesitancy. Results are discussed considering results of other national and international studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-17112-6. BioMed Central 2023-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10634164/ /pubmed/37946143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17112-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Caserotti, Marta
Girardi, Paolo
Sellaro, Roberta
Rubaltelli, Enrico
Tasso, Alessandra
Lotto, Lorella
Gavaruzzi, Teresa
To vaccinate or not to vaccinate? The interplay between pro- and against- vaccination reasons
title To vaccinate or not to vaccinate? The interplay between pro- and against- vaccination reasons
title_full To vaccinate or not to vaccinate? The interplay between pro- and against- vaccination reasons
title_fullStr To vaccinate or not to vaccinate? The interplay between pro- and against- vaccination reasons
title_full_unstemmed To vaccinate or not to vaccinate? The interplay between pro- and against- vaccination reasons
title_short To vaccinate or not to vaccinate? The interplay between pro- and against- vaccination reasons
title_sort to vaccinate or not to vaccinate? the interplay between pro- and against- vaccination reasons
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37946143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17112-6
work_keys_str_mv AT caserottimarta tovaccinateornottovaccinatetheinterplaybetweenproandagainstvaccinationreasons
AT girardipaolo tovaccinateornottovaccinatetheinterplaybetweenproandagainstvaccinationreasons
AT sellaroroberta tovaccinateornottovaccinatetheinterplaybetweenproandagainstvaccinationreasons
AT rubaltellienrico tovaccinateornottovaccinatetheinterplaybetweenproandagainstvaccinationreasons
AT tassoalessandra tovaccinateornottovaccinatetheinterplaybetweenproandagainstvaccinationreasons
AT lottolorella tovaccinateornottovaccinatetheinterplaybetweenproandagainstvaccinationreasons
AT gavaruzziteresa tovaccinateornottovaccinatetheinterplaybetweenproandagainstvaccinationreasons