Cargando…

Challenges in e-Health: The effect of digitalisation of frequency voiding charts on compliance in paediatric patients. Randomised controlled trial comparing digital and versus paper frequency voiding charts

OBJECTIVE: Frequency voiding charts are commonly used to gain better insight into the voiding and drinking behaviours of patients with voiding symptoms. Non-compliance when filling out a chart is known to be high. The use of a digital application might increase adherence, but little research has bee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Wall, Liesbeth L, Kragt, Elisabeth AM, Van De Wetering, Eline HM, Cobussen-Boekhorst, Johanna GL, Mantel-van Stel, Joyce, Kortmann, Barbara BM, Feitz, Wout F, Bootsma-Robroeks, Charlotte MHHT
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37954691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076231207577
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Frequency voiding charts are commonly used to gain better insight into the voiding and drinking behaviours of patients with voiding symptoms. Non-compliance when filling out a chart is known to be high. The use of a digital application might increase adherence, but little research has been conducted on this topic. The aim of this study is to compare the quality (number of correctly filled out charts) and quantity (number of complete charts) of digital versus paper frequency voiding charts among children and their parents. METHODS: A multi-centre parallel randomised controlled trial was conducted. Participants were assigned either a 48-h digital frequency voiding chart or a 48-h paper frequency voiding chart. Completion rates were scored based on a predefined scoring method and transcribed into a percentage. Secondary objectives included user friendliness, feasibility, degree of the child's participation, and attractiveness. Trail registry data: NTR NL9383. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients were randomised to either a digital (N = 53) or paper (N = 44) frequency voiding chart. No significant difference in complete and accurately filled out frequency voiding charts was seen between the groups, with 35% (N = 18) for digital and 50% (N = 22) for paper, p = 0.12. Subjects considered the digital application more appealing, more educative, and more inviting compared to the paper chart (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this underpowered study, no significant difference appeared between the groups in the number of complete and accurately filled out frequency voiding charts. Implementation of e-health did not seem to improve compliance. In daily practice, personal preference might offer the best solution.