Cargando…

An unmet need: arrhythmia detection by implantable loop recorder in the systemic right ventricle

AIMS: Patients with systemic right ventricles are at high risk of sudden cardiac death. Arrhythmia is a significant risk factor. Routine Holter monitoring is opportunistic with poor adherence. The aim of this study was to determine if continuous rhythm monitoring with an implantable loop recorder (I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kakarla, Jayant, Crossland, David S, Murray, Stephen, Adhvaryu, Kaitav, Jansen, Katrijn, Rybicka, Justyna, Hermuzi, Antony, Martin, Ruairidh, Shepherd, Ewen, Seller, Neil, Coats, Louise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37816150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad304
_version_ 1785132847774826496
author Kakarla, Jayant
Crossland, David S
Murray, Stephen
Adhvaryu, Kaitav
Jansen, Katrijn
Rybicka, Justyna
Hermuzi, Antony
Martin, Ruairidh
Shepherd, Ewen
Seller, Neil
Coats, Louise
author_facet Kakarla, Jayant
Crossland, David S
Murray, Stephen
Adhvaryu, Kaitav
Jansen, Katrijn
Rybicka, Justyna
Hermuzi, Antony
Martin, Ruairidh
Shepherd, Ewen
Seller, Neil
Coats, Louise
author_sort Kakarla, Jayant
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Patients with systemic right ventricles are at high risk of sudden cardiac death. Arrhythmia is a significant risk factor. Routine Holter monitoring is opportunistic with poor adherence. The aim of this study was to determine if continuous rhythm monitoring with an implantable loop recorder (ILR) could allow early detection of clinically important arrhythmias. METHODS AND RESULTS: Implantable loop recorder implantation was offered to patients with atrial switch repair for transposition of the great arteries. Recordings were made with symptoms or, automatically for pauses, significant bradycardia or tachycardia and reviewed by the multi-disciplinary team. Twenty-four out of 36 eligible patients underwent ILR implantation with no complication. Forty-two per cent had preserved ventricular function, 75% were NYHA functional class I, 88% had low sudden cardiac death risk, 33% had previous intra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia (IART), and none had known conduction disease. Eighteen out of 24 (75%) patients made 52 recordings (52% automated) over 39.5 months (1.6–72.5). Thirty-two out of 52 (62%) recordings in 15/24 (63%) of the cohort were clinically significant and included sinus node disease (two patients), atrioventricular block (two patients), IART (seven patients), and IART with sinus node disease or atrioventricular block (four patients). Implantable loop recorder recordings prompted medication change in 11 patients [beta-blockers (n = 9), anti-coagulation (n = 5), and stopping anti-coagulation (n = 1)] and device therapy recommendation in seven patients [five pacemakers (three: atrioventricular block) and two defibrillators]. Two patients declined intervention; one suffered an arrhythmic death. Intra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia and clinically relevant conduction disease were detected in patients irrespective of sudden cardiac death risk. CONCLUSION: Continuous monitoring with an ILR in patients with systemic right ventricle following atrial switch detects clinically relevant arrhythmias that impact decision-making. In this cohort, clinically relevant arrhythmias did not correlate with sudden cardiac death risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10634521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106345212023-11-10 An unmet need: arrhythmia detection by implantable loop recorder in the systemic right ventricle Kakarla, Jayant Crossland, David S Murray, Stephen Adhvaryu, Kaitav Jansen, Katrijn Rybicka, Justyna Hermuzi, Antony Martin, Ruairidh Shepherd, Ewen Seller, Neil Coats, Louise Europace Clinical Research AIMS: Patients with systemic right ventricles are at high risk of sudden cardiac death. Arrhythmia is a significant risk factor. Routine Holter monitoring is opportunistic with poor adherence. The aim of this study was to determine if continuous rhythm monitoring with an implantable loop recorder (ILR) could allow early detection of clinically important arrhythmias. METHODS AND RESULTS: Implantable loop recorder implantation was offered to patients with atrial switch repair for transposition of the great arteries. Recordings were made with symptoms or, automatically for pauses, significant bradycardia or tachycardia and reviewed by the multi-disciplinary team. Twenty-four out of 36 eligible patients underwent ILR implantation with no complication. Forty-two per cent had preserved ventricular function, 75% were NYHA functional class I, 88% had low sudden cardiac death risk, 33% had previous intra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia (IART), and none had known conduction disease. Eighteen out of 24 (75%) patients made 52 recordings (52% automated) over 39.5 months (1.6–72.5). Thirty-two out of 52 (62%) recordings in 15/24 (63%) of the cohort were clinically significant and included sinus node disease (two patients), atrioventricular block (two patients), IART (seven patients), and IART with sinus node disease or atrioventricular block (four patients). Implantable loop recorder recordings prompted medication change in 11 patients [beta-blockers (n = 9), anti-coagulation (n = 5), and stopping anti-coagulation (n = 1)] and device therapy recommendation in seven patients [five pacemakers (three: atrioventricular block) and two defibrillators]. Two patients declined intervention; one suffered an arrhythmic death. Intra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia and clinically relevant conduction disease were detected in patients irrespective of sudden cardiac death risk. CONCLUSION: Continuous monitoring with an ILR in patients with systemic right ventricle following atrial switch detects clinically relevant arrhythmias that impact decision-making. In this cohort, clinically relevant arrhythmias did not correlate with sudden cardiac death risk. Oxford University Press 2023-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10634521/ /pubmed/37816150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad304 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Kakarla, Jayant
Crossland, David S
Murray, Stephen
Adhvaryu, Kaitav
Jansen, Katrijn
Rybicka, Justyna
Hermuzi, Antony
Martin, Ruairidh
Shepherd, Ewen
Seller, Neil
Coats, Louise
An unmet need: arrhythmia detection by implantable loop recorder in the systemic right ventricle
title An unmet need: arrhythmia detection by implantable loop recorder in the systemic right ventricle
title_full An unmet need: arrhythmia detection by implantable loop recorder in the systemic right ventricle
title_fullStr An unmet need: arrhythmia detection by implantable loop recorder in the systemic right ventricle
title_full_unstemmed An unmet need: arrhythmia detection by implantable loop recorder in the systemic right ventricle
title_short An unmet need: arrhythmia detection by implantable loop recorder in the systemic right ventricle
title_sort unmet need: arrhythmia detection by implantable loop recorder in the systemic right ventricle
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37816150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad304
work_keys_str_mv AT kakarlajayant anunmetneedarrhythmiadetectionbyimplantablelooprecorderinthesystemicrightventricle
AT crosslanddavids anunmetneedarrhythmiadetectionbyimplantablelooprecorderinthesystemicrightventricle
AT murraystephen anunmetneedarrhythmiadetectionbyimplantablelooprecorderinthesystemicrightventricle
AT adhvaryukaitav anunmetneedarrhythmiadetectionbyimplantablelooprecorderinthesystemicrightventricle
AT jansenkatrijn anunmetneedarrhythmiadetectionbyimplantablelooprecorderinthesystemicrightventricle
AT rybickajustyna anunmetneedarrhythmiadetectionbyimplantablelooprecorderinthesystemicrightventricle
AT hermuziantony anunmetneedarrhythmiadetectionbyimplantablelooprecorderinthesystemicrightventricle
AT martinruairidh anunmetneedarrhythmiadetectionbyimplantablelooprecorderinthesystemicrightventricle
AT shepherdewen anunmetneedarrhythmiadetectionbyimplantablelooprecorderinthesystemicrightventricle
AT sellerneil anunmetneedarrhythmiadetectionbyimplantablelooprecorderinthesystemicrightventricle
AT coatslouise anunmetneedarrhythmiadetectionbyimplantablelooprecorderinthesystemicrightventricle
AT kakarlajayant unmetneedarrhythmiadetectionbyimplantablelooprecorderinthesystemicrightventricle
AT crosslanddavids unmetneedarrhythmiadetectionbyimplantablelooprecorderinthesystemicrightventricle
AT murraystephen unmetneedarrhythmiadetectionbyimplantablelooprecorderinthesystemicrightventricle
AT adhvaryukaitav unmetneedarrhythmiadetectionbyimplantablelooprecorderinthesystemicrightventricle
AT jansenkatrijn unmetneedarrhythmiadetectionbyimplantablelooprecorderinthesystemicrightventricle
AT rybickajustyna unmetneedarrhythmiadetectionbyimplantablelooprecorderinthesystemicrightventricle
AT hermuziantony unmetneedarrhythmiadetectionbyimplantablelooprecorderinthesystemicrightventricle
AT martinruairidh unmetneedarrhythmiadetectionbyimplantablelooprecorderinthesystemicrightventricle
AT shepherdewen unmetneedarrhythmiadetectionbyimplantablelooprecorderinthesystemicrightventricle
AT sellerneil unmetneedarrhythmiadetectionbyimplantablelooprecorderinthesystemicrightventricle
AT coatslouise unmetneedarrhythmiadetectionbyimplantablelooprecorderinthesystemicrightventricle