Cargando…

Risk of transient vision loss after intravitreal aflibercept using vial-prepared vs. the novel prefilled syringe formulation

PURPOSE: To compare the risk of transient vision loss (TVL) probably attributable to a severe intraocular pressure spike after intravitreal aflibercept application using the novel prefilled syringe (PFS) vs. the established vial system (VS). METHODS: Datasets of the intravitreal injection service of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klaas, Julian E., Bui, Vinh, Maierhofer, Niklas, Schworm, Benedikt, Maier, Mathias, Priglinger, Siegfried G., Siedlecki, Jakob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37954554
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1295633
_version_ 1785132851719569408
author Klaas, Julian E.
Bui, Vinh
Maierhofer, Niklas
Schworm, Benedikt
Maier, Mathias
Priglinger, Siegfried G.
Siedlecki, Jakob
author_facet Klaas, Julian E.
Bui, Vinh
Maierhofer, Niklas
Schworm, Benedikt
Maier, Mathias
Priglinger, Siegfried G.
Siedlecki, Jakob
author_sort Klaas, Julian E.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the risk of transient vision loss (TVL) probably attributable to a severe intraocular pressure spike after intravitreal aflibercept application using the novel prefilled syringe (PFS) vs. the established vial system (VS). METHODS: Datasets of the intravitreal injection service of the Ludwig Maximilians-University Munich and the Technical University Munich, Germany, were screened for documentation of TVL after intravitreal injection of aflibercept. The observation period included two full months prior to the introduction of the novel PFS and two months afterwards. TVL was defined as loss of perception of hand motion for a duration of >30 s. RESULTS: Over a period of four months, 1720 intravitreal injections of aflibercept were administered in 672 patients. There were 842 injections with the old VS, and 878 injections using the novel PFS. Using the VS, TVL was noted during two injections (0.24%) in two patients, as compared to 11 cases of TVL (1.25%) in 10 patients with the PFS (p = 0.015). Using the PFS, patients had a 5.3-fold risk of TVL as compared to the VS (OR: 5.33; 95% CI: 1.2–24.1; p = 0.0298). CONCLUSION: There was a more than five-fold risk of TVL using the novel pre-filled aflibercept syringe as compared to the established vial system. During informed consent, this risk should be discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10634539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106345392023-11-10 Risk of transient vision loss after intravitreal aflibercept using vial-prepared vs. the novel prefilled syringe formulation Klaas, Julian E. Bui, Vinh Maierhofer, Niklas Schworm, Benedikt Maier, Mathias Priglinger, Siegfried G. Siedlecki, Jakob Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine PURPOSE: To compare the risk of transient vision loss (TVL) probably attributable to a severe intraocular pressure spike after intravitreal aflibercept application using the novel prefilled syringe (PFS) vs. the established vial system (VS). METHODS: Datasets of the intravitreal injection service of the Ludwig Maximilians-University Munich and the Technical University Munich, Germany, were screened for documentation of TVL after intravitreal injection of aflibercept. The observation period included two full months prior to the introduction of the novel PFS and two months afterwards. TVL was defined as loss of perception of hand motion for a duration of >30 s. RESULTS: Over a period of four months, 1720 intravitreal injections of aflibercept were administered in 672 patients. There were 842 injections with the old VS, and 878 injections using the novel PFS. Using the VS, TVL was noted during two injections (0.24%) in two patients, as compared to 11 cases of TVL (1.25%) in 10 patients with the PFS (p = 0.015). Using the PFS, patients had a 5.3-fold risk of TVL as compared to the VS (OR: 5.33; 95% CI: 1.2–24.1; p = 0.0298). CONCLUSION: There was a more than five-fold risk of TVL using the novel pre-filled aflibercept syringe as compared to the established vial system. During informed consent, this risk should be discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10634539/ /pubmed/37954554 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1295633 Text en Copyright © 2023 Klaas, Bui, Maierhofer, Schworm, Maier, Priglinger and Siedlecki. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Klaas, Julian E.
Bui, Vinh
Maierhofer, Niklas
Schworm, Benedikt
Maier, Mathias
Priglinger, Siegfried G.
Siedlecki, Jakob
Risk of transient vision loss after intravitreal aflibercept using vial-prepared vs. the novel prefilled syringe formulation
title Risk of transient vision loss after intravitreal aflibercept using vial-prepared vs. the novel prefilled syringe formulation
title_full Risk of transient vision loss after intravitreal aflibercept using vial-prepared vs. the novel prefilled syringe formulation
title_fullStr Risk of transient vision loss after intravitreal aflibercept using vial-prepared vs. the novel prefilled syringe formulation
title_full_unstemmed Risk of transient vision loss after intravitreal aflibercept using vial-prepared vs. the novel prefilled syringe formulation
title_short Risk of transient vision loss after intravitreal aflibercept using vial-prepared vs. the novel prefilled syringe formulation
title_sort risk of transient vision loss after intravitreal aflibercept using vial-prepared vs. the novel prefilled syringe formulation
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37954554
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1295633
work_keys_str_mv AT klaasjuliane riskoftransientvisionlossafterintravitrealafliberceptusingvialpreparedvsthenovelprefilledsyringeformulation
AT buivinh riskoftransientvisionlossafterintravitrealafliberceptusingvialpreparedvsthenovelprefilledsyringeformulation
AT maierhoferniklas riskoftransientvisionlossafterintravitrealafliberceptusingvialpreparedvsthenovelprefilledsyringeformulation
AT schwormbenedikt riskoftransientvisionlossafterintravitrealafliberceptusingvialpreparedvsthenovelprefilledsyringeformulation
AT maiermathias riskoftransientvisionlossafterintravitrealafliberceptusingvialpreparedvsthenovelprefilledsyringeformulation
AT priglingersiegfriedg riskoftransientvisionlossafterintravitrealafliberceptusingvialpreparedvsthenovelprefilledsyringeformulation
AT siedleckijakob riskoftransientvisionlossafterintravitrealafliberceptusingvialpreparedvsthenovelprefilledsyringeformulation