Cargando…
Risk of transient vision loss after intravitreal aflibercept using vial-prepared vs. the novel prefilled syringe formulation
PURPOSE: To compare the risk of transient vision loss (TVL) probably attributable to a severe intraocular pressure spike after intravitreal aflibercept application using the novel prefilled syringe (PFS) vs. the established vial system (VS). METHODS: Datasets of the intravitreal injection service of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37954554 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1295633 |
_version_ | 1785132851719569408 |
---|---|
author | Klaas, Julian E. Bui, Vinh Maierhofer, Niklas Schworm, Benedikt Maier, Mathias Priglinger, Siegfried G. Siedlecki, Jakob |
author_facet | Klaas, Julian E. Bui, Vinh Maierhofer, Niklas Schworm, Benedikt Maier, Mathias Priglinger, Siegfried G. Siedlecki, Jakob |
author_sort | Klaas, Julian E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare the risk of transient vision loss (TVL) probably attributable to a severe intraocular pressure spike after intravitreal aflibercept application using the novel prefilled syringe (PFS) vs. the established vial system (VS). METHODS: Datasets of the intravitreal injection service of the Ludwig Maximilians-University Munich and the Technical University Munich, Germany, were screened for documentation of TVL after intravitreal injection of aflibercept. The observation period included two full months prior to the introduction of the novel PFS and two months afterwards. TVL was defined as loss of perception of hand motion for a duration of >30 s. RESULTS: Over a period of four months, 1720 intravitreal injections of aflibercept were administered in 672 patients. There were 842 injections with the old VS, and 878 injections using the novel PFS. Using the VS, TVL was noted during two injections (0.24%) in two patients, as compared to 11 cases of TVL (1.25%) in 10 patients with the PFS (p = 0.015). Using the PFS, patients had a 5.3-fold risk of TVL as compared to the VS (OR: 5.33; 95% CI: 1.2–24.1; p = 0.0298). CONCLUSION: There was a more than five-fold risk of TVL using the novel pre-filled aflibercept syringe as compared to the established vial system. During informed consent, this risk should be discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10634539 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106345392023-11-10 Risk of transient vision loss after intravitreal aflibercept using vial-prepared vs. the novel prefilled syringe formulation Klaas, Julian E. Bui, Vinh Maierhofer, Niklas Schworm, Benedikt Maier, Mathias Priglinger, Siegfried G. Siedlecki, Jakob Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine PURPOSE: To compare the risk of transient vision loss (TVL) probably attributable to a severe intraocular pressure spike after intravitreal aflibercept application using the novel prefilled syringe (PFS) vs. the established vial system (VS). METHODS: Datasets of the intravitreal injection service of the Ludwig Maximilians-University Munich and the Technical University Munich, Germany, were screened for documentation of TVL after intravitreal injection of aflibercept. The observation period included two full months prior to the introduction of the novel PFS and two months afterwards. TVL was defined as loss of perception of hand motion for a duration of >30 s. RESULTS: Over a period of four months, 1720 intravitreal injections of aflibercept were administered in 672 patients. There were 842 injections with the old VS, and 878 injections using the novel PFS. Using the VS, TVL was noted during two injections (0.24%) in two patients, as compared to 11 cases of TVL (1.25%) in 10 patients with the PFS (p = 0.015). Using the PFS, patients had a 5.3-fold risk of TVL as compared to the VS (OR: 5.33; 95% CI: 1.2–24.1; p = 0.0298). CONCLUSION: There was a more than five-fold risk of TVL using the novel pre-filled aflibercept syringe as compared to the established vial system. During informed consent, this risk should be discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10634539/ /pubmed/37954554 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1295633 Text en Copyright © 2023 Klaas, Bui, Maierhofer, Schworm, Maier, Priglinger and Siedlecki. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Klaas, Julian E. Bui, Vinh Maierhofer, Niklas Schworm, Benedikt Maier, Mathias Priglinger, Siegfried G. Siedlecki, Jakob Risk of transient vision loss after intravitreal aflibercept using vial-prepared vs. the novel prefilled syringe formulation |
title | Risk of transient vision loss after intravitreal aflibercept using vial-prepared vs. the novel prefilled syringe formulation |
title_full | Risk of transient vision loss after intravitreal aflibercept using vial-prepared vs. the novel prefilled syringe formulation |
title_fullStr | Risk of transient vision loss after intravitreal aflibercept using vial-prepared vs. the novel prefilled syringe formulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk of transient vision loss after intravitreal aflibercept using vial-prepared vs. the novel prefilled syringe formulation |
title_short | Risk of transient vision loss after intravitreal aflibercept using vial-prepared vs. the novel prefilled syringe formulation |
title_sort | risk of transient vision loss after intravitreal aflibercept using vial-prepared vs. the novel prefilled syringe formulation |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37954554 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1295633 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klaasjuliane riskoftransientvisionlossafterintravitrealafliberceptusingvialpreparedvsthenovelprefilledsyringeformulation AT buivinh riskoftransientvisionlossafterintravitrealafliberceptusingvialpreparedvsthenovelprefilledsyringeformulation AT maierhoferniklas riskoftransientvisionlossafterintravitrealafliberceptusingvialpreparedvsthenovelprefilledsyringeformulation AT schwormbenedikt riskoftransientvisionlossafterintravitrealafliberceptusingvialpreparedvsthenovelprefilledsyringeformulation AT maiermathias riskoftransientvisionlossafterintravitrealafliberceptusingvialpreparedvsthenovelprefilledsyringeformulation AT priglingersiegfriedg riskoftransientvisionlossafterintravitrealafliberceptusingvialpreparedvsthenovelprefilledsyringeformulation AT siedleckijakob riskoftransientvisionlossafterintravitrealafliberceptusingvialpreparedvsthenovelprefilledsyringeformulation |