Cargando…
Differences in transcription initiation directionality underlie distinctions between plants and animals in chromatin modification patterns at genes and cis-regulatory elements
Transcriptional initiation is among the first regulated steps controlling eukaryotic gene expression. High-throughput profiling of fungal and animal genomes has revealed that RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) often initiates transcription in both directions at the promoter transcription start site (TSS), b...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37961418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.03.565513 |
_version_ | 1785146291683065856 |
---|---|
author | Silver, Brianna D. Willett, Courtney G. Maher, Kelsey A. Wang, Dongxue Deal, Roger B. |
author_facet | Silver, Brianna D. Willett, Courtney G. Maher, Kelsey A. Wang, Dongxue Deal, Roger B. |
author_sort | Silver, Brianna D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Transcriptional initiation is among the first regulated steps controlling eukaryotic gene expression. High-throughput profiling of fungal and animal genomes has revealed that RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) often initiates transcription in both directions at the promoter transcription start site (TSS), but generally only elongates productively into the gene body. Additionally, Pol II can initiate transcription in both directions at cis-regulatory elements (CREs) such as enhancers. These bidirectional Pol II initiation events can be observed directly with methods that capture nascent transcripts, and they are also revealed indirectly by the presence of transcription-associated histone modifications on both sides of the TSS or CRE. Previous studies have shown that nascent RNAs and transcription-associated histone modifications in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana accumulate mainly in the gene body, suggesting that transcription does not initiate widely in the upstream direction from genes in this plant. We compared transcription-associated histone modifications and nascent transcripts at both TSSs and CREs in Arabidopsis thaliana, Drosophila melanogaster, and Homo sapiens. Our results provide evidence for mostly unidirectional Pol II initiation at both promoters and gene-proximal CREs of Arabidopsis thaliana, whereas bidirectional transcription initiation is observed widely at promoters in both Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens, as well as CREs in Drosophila. Furthermore, the distribution of transcription-associated histone modifications around TSSs in the Oryza sativa (rice) and Glycine max (soybean) genomes suggests that unidirectional transcription initiation is the norm in these genomes as well. These results suggest that there are fundamental differences in transcriptional initiation directionality between flowering plant and metazoan genomes, which are manifested as distinct patterns of chromatin modifications around RNA polymerase initiation sites. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10635121 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106351212023-11-13 Differences in transcription initiation directionality underlie distinctions between plants and animals in chromatin modification patterns at genes and cis-regulatory elements Silver, Brianna D. Willett, Courtney G. Maher, Kelsey A. Wang, Dongxue Deal, Roger B. bioRxiv Article Transcriptional initiation is among the first regulated steps controlling eukaryotic gene expression. High-throughput profiling of fungal and animal genomes has revealed that RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) often initiates transcription in both directions at the promoter transcription start site (TSS), but generally only elongates productively into the gene body. Additionally, Pol II can initiate transcription in both directions at cis-regulatory elements (CREs) such as enhancers. These bidirectional Pol II initiation events can be observed directly with methods that capture nascent transcripts, and they are also revealed indirectly by the presence of transcription-associated histone modifications on both sides of the TSS or CRE. Previous studies have shown that nascent RNAs and transcription-associated histone modifications in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana accumulate mainly in the gene body, suggesting that transcription does not initiate widely in the upstream direction from genes in this plant. We compared transcription-associated histone modifications and nascent transcripts at both TSSs and CREs in Arabidopsis thaliana, Drosophila melanogaster, and Homo sapiens. Our results provide evidence for mostly unidirectional Pol II initiation at both promoters and gene-proximal CREs of Arabidopsis thaliana, whereas bidirectional transcription initiation is observed widely at promoters in both Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens, as well as CREs in Drosophila. Furthermore, the distribution of transcription-associated histone modifications around TSSs in the Oryza sativa (rice) and Glycine max (soybean) genomes suggests that unidirectional transcription initiation is the norm in these genomes as well. These results suggest that there are fundamental differences in transcriptional initiation directionality between flowering plant and metazoan genomes, which are manifested as distinct patterns of chromatin modifications around RNA polymerase initiation sites. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10635121/ /pubmed/37961418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.03.565513 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. |
spellingShingle | Article Silver, Brianna D. Willett, Courtney G. Maher, Kelsey A. Wang, Dongxue Deal, Roger B. Differences in transcription initiation directionality underlie distinctions between plants and animals in chromatin modification patterns at genes and cis-regulatory elements |
title | Differences in transcription initiation directionality underlie distinctions between plants and animals in chromatin modification patterns at genes and cis-regulatory elements |
title_full | Differences in transcription initiation directionality underlie distinctions between plants and animals in chromatin modification patterns at genes and cis-regulatory elements |
title_fullStr | Differences in transcription initiation directionality underlie distinctions between plants and animals in chromatin modification patterns at genes and cis-regulatory elements |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in transcription initiation directionality underlie distinctions between plants and animals in chromatin modification patterns at genes and cis-regulatory elements |
title_short | Differences in transcription initiation directionality underlie distinctions between plants and animals in chromatin modification patterns at genes and cis-regulatory elements |
title_sort | differences in transcription initiation directionality underlie distinctions between plants and animals in chromatin modification patterns at genes and cis-regulatory elements |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37961418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.03.565513 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silverbriannad differencesintranscriptioninitiationdirectionalityunderliedistinctionsbetweenplantsandanimalsinchromatinmodificationpatternsatgenesandcisregulatoryelements AT willettcourtneyg differencesintranscriptioninitiationdirectionalityunderliedistinctionsbetweenplantsandanimalsinchromatinmodificationpatternsatgenesandcisregulatoryelements AT maherkelseya differencesintranscriptioninitiationdirectionalityunderliedistinctionsbetweenplantsandanimalsinchromatinmodificationpatternsatgenesandcisregulatoryelements AT wangdongxue differencesintranscriptioninitiationdirectionalityunderliedistinctionsbetweenplantsandanimalsinchromatinmodificationpatternsatgenesandcisregulatoryelements AT dealrogerb differencesintranscriptioninitiationdirectionalityunderliedistinctionsbetweenplantsandanimalsinchromatinmodificationpatternsatgenesandcisregulatoryelements |