Cargando…

Does domestic violence legislation reduce permissive attitudes about intimate partner violence? Longitudinal evidence from men and women from 61 countries

BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is highly prevalent and has substantial implications for women’s health. Changing IPV attitudes is one pathway to reduce IPV. While evidence suggests that interventions targeting individuals may change IPV attitudes, the effect of wider-scale interventions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richardson, Robin A, Hadd, Alexandria R, Rodriguez-Planas, Nuria, Wiederkehr, Katjana, Jamshed, Farheen, Benmarhnia, Tarik, Clark, Cari Jo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37961711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.23.23297413
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is highly prevalent and has substantial implications for women’s health. Changing IPV attitudes is one pathway to reduce IPV. While evidence suggests that interventions targeting individuals may change IPV attitudes, the effect of wider-scale interventions, such as legislation, remain unknown. METHODS: We used individual-level IPV attitudes information collected between 1997 and 2020 by the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) and the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS), which we linked with national-level domestic violence (DV) legislation information. We evaluated the effect of adoption of DV legislation on changes in IPV attitudes using a difference-in-differences study design that controlled for time-varying country-level confounding and accounted for staggered timing of legislation adoption. FINDINGS: Our sample included 2,184,047 women from 60 countries and 390,877 men from 40 countries. After controlling for country-level confounders, adoption of DV legislation reduced IPV acceptability among women (average treatment effect among treated (ATT) = −0.07, 95% CI: −0.16, 0.06) and men (ATT = −0.11, 95% CI: −0.22, 0.03) although estimates were imprecise and included the null. INTERPRETATION: DV legislation may reduce permissive IPV attitudes, especially among men, although conclusions should be interpreted cautiously due to imprecise estimates. FUNDING: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (5R00HD104896).