Cargando…
In praise of fossil fuel subsidies (for cooking) ()
We use three quantitative case studies to argue that ubiquitous and universal condemnation of fossil fuel subsidies is myopic and does not adequately consider subsidizing gas for cooking as a potential strategy to improve public health and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Ecuador offers a view into...
Autores principales: | Gould, Carlos F., Bailis, Rob, Balakrishnan, Kalpana, Burke, Marshall, Espinoza, Sebastián, Mehta, Sumi, Schlesinger, Samuel B., Suarez-Lopez, José R., Pillarisetti, Ajay |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37961585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.26.23297550 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The SDGs and fossil fuel subsidy reform
por: van Asselt, Harro
Publicado: (2023) -
Long-standing LPG subsidies, cooking fuel stacking, and personal exposure to air pollution in rural and peri-urban Ecuador
por: Gould, Carlos F., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
The producer benefits of implicit fossil fuel subsidies in the United States
por: Kotchen, Matthew J.
Publicado: (2021) -
Political leadership has limited impact on fossil fuel taxes and subsidies
por: Martinez-Alvarez, Cesar B., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Widespread Clean Cooking Fuel Scale-Up and under-5 Lower Respiratory Infection Mortality: An Ecological Analysis in Ecuador, 1990–2019
por: Gould, Carlos F., et al.
Publicado: (2023)