Cargando…

Development of a method for Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI): A modified Delphi study

BACKGROUND. Intervention adaptation is often necessary to improve the fit between evidence-based practices/programs and implementation contexts. Existing frameworks describe intervention adaptation processes but do not provide detailed steps for prospectively designing adaptations, are designed for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brewer, Stephanie K, Corbin, Catherine M, Baumann, Ana A, Stirman, Shannon Wiltsey, Jones, Janine M, Pullmann, Michael D, Lyon, Aaron R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Journal Experts 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37961432
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3467152/v1
_version_ 1785146338646687744
author Brewer, Stephanie K
Corbin, Catherine M
Baumann, Ana A
Stirman, Shannon Wiltsey
Jones, Janine M
Pullmann, Michael D
Lyon, Aaron R
author_facet Brewer, Stephanie K
Corbin, Catherine M
Baumann, Ana A
Stirman, Shannon Wiltsey
Jones, Janine M
Pullmann, Michael D
Lyon, Aaron R
author_sort Brewer, Stephanie K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND. Intervention adaptation is often necessary to improve the fit between evidence-based practices/programs and implementation contexts. Existing frameworks describe intervention adaptation processes but do not provide detailed steps for prospectively designing adaptations, are designed for researchers, and require substantial time and resources to complete. A pragmatic approach to guide implementers through developing and assessing adaptations in local contexts is needed. The goal of this project was to develop Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI), a method for intervention adaptation that leverages human centered design methods and is tailored to the needs of intervention implementers working in applied settings with limited time and resources. METHOD. MODIFI was iteratively developed via a mixed-methods modified Delphi process. Feedback was collected from 43 implementation research and practice experts. Two rounds of data collection gathered quantitative ratings of acceptability (Round 1) and feasibility (Round 2), as well as qualitative feedback regarding MODIFI revisions analyzed using conventional content analysis. RESULTS. In Round 1, most participants rated all proposed components as essential but identified important avenues for revision which were incorporated into MODIFI prior to Round 2. Round 2 emphasized feasibility, where ratings were generally high and fewer substantive revisions were recommended. Round 2 changes largely surrounded operationalization of terms/processes and sequencing of content. Results include a detailed presentation of the final version of the three-step MODIFI method (Step 1: Learn about the users, local context, and intervention; Step 2: Adapt the intervention; Step 3: Evaluate the adaptation) along with a case example of its application. DISCUSSION. MODIFI is a pragmatic method that was developed to extend the contributions of other research-based adaptation theories, models, and frameworks while integrating methods that are tailored to the needs of intervention implementers. Guiding teams to tailor evidence-based interventions to their local context may extend for whom, where, and under what conditions an intervention can be effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10635387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Journal Experts
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106353872023-11-13 Development of a method for Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI): A modified Delphi study Brewer, Stephanie K Corbin, Catherine M Baumann, Ana A Stirman, Shannon Wiltsey Jones, Janine M Pullmann, Michael D Lyon, Aaron R Res Sq Article BACKGROUND. Intervention adaptation is often necessary to improve the fit between evidence-based practices/programs and implementation contexts. Existing frameworks describe intervention adaptation processes but do not provide detailed steps for prospectively designing adaptations, are designed for researchers, and require substantial time and resources to complete. A pragmatic approach to guide implementers through developing and assessing adaptations in local contexts is needed. The goal of this project was to develop Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI), a method for intervention adaptation that leverages human centered design methods and is tailored to the needs of intervention implementers working in applied settings with limited time and resources. METHOD. MODIFI was iteratively developed via a mixed-methods modified Delphi process. Feedback was collected from 43 implementation research and practice experts. Two rounds of data collection gathered quantitative ratings of acceptability (Round 1) and feasibility (Round 2), as well as qualitative feedback regarding MODIFI revisions analyzed using conventional content analysis. RESULTS. In Round 1, most participants rated all proposed components as essential but identified important avenues for revision which were incorporated into MODIFI prior to Round 2. Round 2 emphasized feasibility, where ratings were generally high and fewer substantive revisions were recommended. Round 2 changes largely surrounded operationalization of terms/processes and sequencing of content. Results include a detailed presentation of the final version of the three-step MODIFI method (Step 1: Learn about the users, local context, and intervention; Step 2: Adapt the intervention; Step 3: Evaluate the adaptation) along with a case example of its application. DISCUSSION. MODIFI is a pragmatic method that was developed to extend the contributions of other research-based adaptation theories, models, and frameworks while integrating methods that are tailored to the needs of intervention implementers. Guiding teams to tailor evidence-based interventions to their local context may extend for whom, where, and under what conditions an intervention can be effective. American Journal Experts 2023-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10635387/ /pubmed/37961432 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3467152/v1 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
spellingShingle Article
Brewer, Stephanie K
Corbin, Catherine M
Baumann, Ana A
Stirman, Shannon Wiltsey
Jones, Janine M
Pullmann, Michael D
Lyon, Aaron R
Development of a method for Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI): A modified Delphi study
title Development of a method for Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI): A modified Delphi study
title_full Development of a method for Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI): A modified Delphi study
title_fullStr Development of a method for Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI): A modified Delphi study
title_full_unstemmed Development of a method for Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI): A modified Delphi study
title_short Development of a method for Making Optimal Decisions for Intervention Flexibility during Implementation (MODIFI): A modified Delphi study
title_sort development of a method for making optimal decisions for intervention flexibility during implementation (modifi): a modified delphi study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37961432
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3467152/v1
work_keys_str_mv AT brewerstephaniek developmentofamethodformakingoptimaldecisionsforinterventionflexibilityduringimplementationmodifiamodifieddelphistudy
AT corbincatherinem developmentofamethodformakingoptimaldecisionsforinterventionflexibilityduringimplementationmodifiamodifieddelphistudy
AT baumannanaa developmentofamethodformakingoptimaldecisionsforinterventionflexibilityduringimplementationmodifiamodifieddelphistudy
AT stirmanshannonwiltsey developmentofamethodformakingoptimaldecisionsforinterventionflexibilityduringimplementationmodifiamodifieddelphistudy
AT jonesjaninem developmentofamethodformakingoptimaldecisionsforinterventionflexibilityduringimplementationmodifiamodifieddelphistudy
AT pullmannmichaeld developmentofamethodformakingoptimaldecisionsforinterventionflexibilityduringimplementationmodifiamodifieddelphistudy
AT lyonaaronr developmentofamethodformakingoptimaldecisionsforinterventionflexibilityduringimplementationmodifiamodifieddelphistudy