Cargando…

Comparison and interobserver reliability of three different methods for measuring the amount of the tibial tuberosity advancement in the preoperative planning of TTAT

INTRODUCTION: The goal of preoperative planning techniques for advancement of the tibial tuberosity is to determine the amount of advancement required to achieve a postoperative patellar tendon angle of 90° and to select the optimal wedge size to achieve this target. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three radi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Della Valle, Giovanni, Aragosa, Federica, Caterino, Chiara, Piscitelli, Alfonso, Di Palma, Cristina, Lamagna, Francesco, Fatone, Gerardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37943815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289259
_version_ 1785133012553302016
author Della Valle, Giovanni
Aragosa, Federica
Caterino, Chiara
Piscitelli, Alfonso
Di Palma, Cristina
Lamagna, Francesco
Fatone, Gerardo
author_facet Della Valle, Giovanni
Aragosa, Federica
Caterino, Chiara
Piscitelli, Alfonso
Di Palma, Cristina
Lamagna, Francesco
Fatone, Gerardo
author_sort Della Valle, Giovanni
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The goal of preoperative planning techniques for advancement of the tibial tuberosity is to determine the amount of advancement required to achieve a postoperative patellar tendon angle of 90° and to select the optimal wedge size to achieve this target. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three radiographic methods for determining the advancement distance for the tibial tuberosity were evaluated for comparability and interobserver reliability. Among the methods developed, we decided to include the common tangent method, the tibial anatomy-based method, and the Bielecki method. For all techniques, radiographs were taken in mediolateral projection with the knee joint flexed at 135°. Three observers with different levels of experience independently evaluated and scored the degree of osteoarthritis for each stifle, as previously described, and performed measurements of the amount of advancement of the tibial tuberosity on 33 stifles using common tangent method, tibial anatomy-based method, and Bielecki method. RESULTS: According to the results, the overall score for osteoarthritis in the mediolateral view was influenced by the experience of the observers, which contradicts the results from a previous study. Regarding the measurement methods used to assess advancement, poor interobserver reliability was found for common tangent method and Bielecki method, while only a slightly moderate interobserver agreement was found for tibial anatomy-based method. DISCUSSION: These results are inconsistent with data collected by Bielecki and colleagues. Moreover, measurements from common tangent method and tibial anatomy-based method were overlapping, as confirmed previously. Conversely, Bielecki method showed no agreement with the other methods included in the present study, with a significantly higher mean rank, probably due to its correction formula. Based on the results of the present study, tibial anatomy-based method has better interobserver reliability and is easier to perform according to the observers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10635514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106355142023-11-10 Comparison and interobserver reliability of three different methods for measuring the amount of the tibial tuberosity advancement in the preoperative planning of TTAT Della Valle, Giovanni Aragosa, Federica Caterino, Chiara Piscitelli, Alfonso Di Palma, Cristina Lamagna, Francesco Fatone, Gerardo PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: The goal of preoperative planning techniques for advancement of the tibial tuberosity is to determine the amount of advancement required to achieve a postoperative patellar tendon angle of 90° and to select the optimal wedge size to achieve this target. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three radiographic methods for determining the advancement distance for the tibial tuberosity were evaluated for comparability and interobserver reliability. Among the methods developed, we decided to include the common tangent method, the tibial anatomy-based method, and the Bielecki method. For all techniques, radiographs were taken in mediolateral projection with the knee joint flexed at 135°. Three observers with different levels of experience independently evaluated and scored the degree of osteoarthritis for each stifle, as previously described, and performed measurements of the amount of advancement of the tibial tuberosity on 33 stifles using common tangent method, tibial anatomy-based method, and Bielecki method. RESULTS: According to the results, the overall score for osteoarthritis in the mediolateral view was influenced by the experience of the observers, which contradicts the results from a previous study. Regarding the measurement methods used to assess advancement, poor interobserver reliability was found for common tangent method and Bielecki method, while only a slightly moderate interobserver agreement was found for tibial anatomy-based method. DISCUSSION: These results are inconsistent with data collected by Bielecki and colleagues. Moreover, measurements from common tangent method and tibial anatomy-based method were overlapping, as confirmed previously. Conversely, Bielecki method showed no agreement with the other methods included in the present study, with a significantly higher mean rank, probably due to its correction formula. Based on the results of the present study, tibial anatomy-based method has better interobserver reliability and is easier to perform according to the observers. Public Library of Science 2023-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10635514/ /pubmed/37943815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289259 Text en © 2023 Della Valle et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Della Valle, Giovanni
Aragosa, Federica
Caterino, Chiara
Piscitelli, Alfonso
Di Palma, Cristina
Lamagna, Francesco
Fatone, Gerardo
Comparison and interobserver reliability of three different methods for measuring the amount of the tibial tuberosity advancement in the preoperative planning of TTAT
title Comparison and interobserver reliability of three different methods for measuring the amount of the tibial tuberosity advancement in the preoperative planning of TTAT
title_full Comparison and interobserver reliability of three different methods for measuring the amount of the tibial tuberosity advancement in the preoperative planning of TTAT
title_fullStr Comparison and interobserver reliability of three different methods for measuring the amount of the tibial tuberosity advancement in the preoperative planning of TTAT
title_full_unstemmed Comparison and interobserver reliability of three different methods for measuring the amount of the tibial tuberosity advancement in the preoperative planning of TTAT
title_short Comparison and interobserver reliability of three different methods for measuring the amount of the tibial tuberosity advancement in the preoperative planning of TTAT
title_sort comparison and interobserver reliability of three different methods for measuring the amount of the tibial tuberosity advancement in the preoperative planning of ttat
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37943815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289259
work_keys_str_mv AT dellavallegiovanni comparisonandinterobserverreliabilityofthreedifferentmethodsformeasuringtheamountofthetibialtuberosityadvancementinthepreoperativeplanningofttat
AT aragosafederica comparisonandinterobserverreliabilityofthreedifferentmethodsformeasuringtheamountofthetibialtuberosityadvancementinthepreoperativeplanningofttat
AT caterinochiara comparisonandinterobserverreliabilityofthreedifferentmethodsformeasuringtheamountofthetibialtuberosityadvancementinthepreoperativeplanningofttat
AT piscitellialfonso comparisonandinterobserverreliabilityofthreedifferentmethodsformeasuringtheamountofthetibialtuberosityadvancementinthepreoperativeplanningofttat
AT dipalmacristina comparisonandinterobserverreliabilityofthreedifferentmethodsformeasuringtheamountofthetibialtuberosityadvancementinthepreoperativeplanningofttat
AT lamagnafrancesco comparisonandinterobserverreliabilityofthreedifferentmethodsformeasuringtheamountofthetibialtuberosityadvancementinthepreoperativeplanningofttat
AT fatonegerardo comparisonandinterobserverreliabilityofthreedifferentmethodsformeasuringtheamountofthetibialtuberosityadvancementinthepreoperativeplanningofttat