Cargando…

Comparison of pain relief of the cervical radiculopathy between high thoracic erector spinae plane block and cervical epidural injection

BACKGROUND: The high thoracic erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been used for the management of chronic shoulder pain or arthroscopic shoulder surgery. No study has evaluated the analgesic efficacy of ESPB in patients with cervical radiculopathy although it is a favored and easy technique compar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hong, Ji Hee, Huh, Se Nyung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37919924
http://dx.doi.org/10.17085/apm.23064
_version_ 1785146375054295040
author Hong, Ji Hee
Huh, Se Nyung
author_facet Hong, Ji Hee
Huh, Se Nyung
author_sort Hong, Ji Hee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The high thoracic erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been used for the management of chronic shoulder pain or arthroscopic shoulder surgery. No study has evaluated the analgesic efficacy of ESPB in patients with cervical radiculopathy although it is a favored and easy technique compared to neuraxial block. The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment outcome of cervical radiculopathy using high thoracic ESPB or cervical interlaminar epidural injection (CEPI). METHODS: This study included 82 patients with neck and arm pain who received CEPI (CEPI group) using 4 ml of 0.1% ropivacaine or high thoracic ipsilateral ESPB (ESPB group) at the T2 or T3 level using 20 ml of 0.1% ropivacaine 20 ml. The degree of pain relief and disability were assessed using an 11-point numerical scale (NRS) and neck disability index (NDI), respectively. RESULTS: The CEPI and ESPB groups demonstrated an equal number of patients with excellent pain relief (NRS reduction ≥ 50%). Significant reduction of NRS was found in both groups, and the effect of time was statistically significant in the groups (P < 0.001). The number of patients who showed an excellent improvement in NDI (NDI reduction ≥ 30%) was 20 (48.8%) and 22 (53.7%) in the CEPI and ESPB groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both the CEPI and ESPB demonstrated significant relief in neck and arm pain with improvement in disability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10635850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106358502023-11-15 Comparison of pain relief of the cervical radiculopathy between high thoracic erector spinae plane block and cervical epidural injection Hong, Ji Hee Huh, Se Nyung Anesth Pain Med (Seoul) Spinal Pain BACKGROUND: The high thoracic erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been used for the management of chronic shoulder pain or arthroscopic shoulder surgery. No study has evaluated the analgesic efficacy of ESPB in patients with cervical radiculopathy although it is a favored and easy technique compared to neuraxial block. The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment outcome of cervical radiculopathy using high thoracic ESPB or cervical interlaminar epidural injection (CEPI). METHODS: This study included 82 patients with neck and arm pain who received CEPI (CEPI group) using 4 ml of 0.1% ropivacaine or high thoracic ipsilateral ESPB (ESPB group) at the T2 or T3 level using 20 ml of 0.1% ropivacaine 20 ml. The degree of pain relief and disability were assessed using an 11-point numerical scale (NRS) and neck disability index (NDI), respectively. RESULTS: The CEPI and ESPB groups demonstrated an equal number of patients with excellent pain relief (NRS reduction ≥ 50%). Significant reduction of NRS was found in both groups, and the effect of time was statistically significant in the groups (P < 0.001). The number of patients who showed an excellent improvement in NDI (NDI reduction ≥ 30%) was 20 (48.8%) and 22 (53.7%) in the CEPI and ESPB groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both the CEPI and ESPB demonstrated significant relief in neck and arm pain with improvement in disability. Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2023-10-31 2023-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10635850/ /pubmed/37919924 http://dx.doi.org/10.17085/apm.23064 Text en Copyright © the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Spinal Pain
Hong, Ji Hee
Huh, Se Nyung
Comparison of pain relief of the cervical radiculopathy between high thoracic erector spinae plane block and cervical epidural injection
title Comparison of pain relief of the cervical radiculopathy between high thoracic erector spinae plane block and cervical epidural injection
title_full Comparison of pain relief of the cervical radiculopathy between high thoracic erector spinae plane block and cervical epidural injection
title_fullStr Comparison of pain relief of the cervical radiculopathy between high thoracic erector spinae plane block and cervical epidural injection
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of pain relief of the cervical radiculopathy between high thoracic erector spinae plane block and cervical epidural injection
title_short Comparison of pain relief of the cervical radiculopathy between high thoracic erector spinae plane block and cervical epidural injection
title_sort comparison of pain relief of the cervical radiculopathy between high thoracic erector spinae plane block and cervical epidural injection
topic Spinal Pain
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37919924
http://dx.doi.org/10.17085/apm.23064
work_keys_str_mv AT hongjihee comparisonofpainreliefofthecervicalradiculopathybetweenhighthoracicerectorspinaeplaneblockandcervicalepiduralinjection
AT huhsenyung comparisonofpainreliefofthecervicalradiculopathybetweenhighthoracicerectorspinaeplaneblockandcervicalepiduralinjection