Cargando…

Quantitative ultrasound fatty liver evaluation in a pediatric population: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging of liver proton density fat fraction

BACKGROUND: Biopsy remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis, the leading cause of pediatric chronic liver disease; however, its costs call for less invasive methods. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) for th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Polti, Giorgia, Frigerio, Francesco, Del Gaudio, Giovanni, Pacini, Patrizia, Dolcetti, Vincenzo, Renda, Maurizio, Angeletti, Sergio, Di Martino, Michele, Iannetti, Giovanni, Perla, Francesco Massimo, Poggiogalle, Eleonora, Cantisani, Vito
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37698614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-023-05749-9
_version_ 1785146390488285184
author Polti, Giorgia
Frigerio, Francesco
Del Gaudio, Giovanni
Pacini, Patrizia
Dolcetti, Vincenzo
Renda, Maurizio
Angeletti, Sergio
Di Martino, Michele
Iannetti, Giovanni
Perla, Francesco Massimo
Poggiogalle, Eleonora
Cantisani, Vito
author_facet Polti, Giorgia
Frigerio, Francesco
Del Gaudio, Giovanni
Pacini, Patrizia
Dolcetti, Vincenzo
Renda, Maurizio
Angeletti, Sergio
Di Martino, Michele
Iannetti, Giovanni
Perla, Francesco Massimo
Poggiogalle, Eleonora
Cantisani, Vito
author_sort Polti, Giorgia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Biopsy remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis, the leading cause of pediatric chronic liver disease; however, its costs call for less invasive methods. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) for the assessment of liver fat content in a pediatric population, using magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 36 patients. MRI-PDFF involved a 3-dimensional T2*-weighted with Dixon pulse multiple-echo sequence using iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least squares estimation (IDEAL IQ). QUS imaging relied on the ultrasound system “RS85 A” (Samsung Medison, Seoul, South Korea) and the following software: Hepato-Renal Index with automated region of interest recommendation (EzHRI), Tissue Attenuation Imaging (TAI), and Tissue Scatter Distribution Imaging (TSI). For each QUS index, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis against MRI-PDFF was used to identify the associated cut-off value and the area under the ROC curve (AUROC). Concordance between two radiologists was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland–Altman analysis. RESULTS: A total of 61.1% of the sample (n=22) displayed a MRI-PDFF ≥ 5.6%; QUS cut-off values were TAI=0.625 (AUROC 0.90, confidence interval [CI] 0.77–1.00), TSI=91.95 (AUROC 0.99, CI 0.98–1.00) and EzHRI=1.215 (AUROC 0.98, CI 0.94–1.00). Inter-rater reliability was good-to-excellent for EzHRI (ICC 0.91, 95% C.I. 0.82–0.95) and TAI (ICC 0.94, 95% C.I. 0.88–0.97) and moderate to good for TSI (ICC 0.73; 95% C.I. 0.53–0.85). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that QUS can be used to reliably assess the presence and degree of pediatric hepatic steatosis. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary material is available at 10.1007/s00247-023-05749-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10635941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106359412023-11-14 Quantitative ultrasound fatty liver evaluation in a pediatric population: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging of liver proton density fat fraction Polti, Giorgia Frigerio, Francesco Del Gaudio, Giovanni Pacini, Patrizia Dolcetti, Vincenzo Renda, Maurizio Angeletti, Sergio Di Martino, Michele Iannetti, Giovanni Perla, Francesco Massimo Poggiogalle, Eleonora Cantisani, Vito Pediatr Radiol Original Article BACKGROUND: Biopsy remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis, the leading cause of pediatric chronic liver disease; however, its costs call for less invasive methods. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) for the assessment of liver fat content in a pediatric population, using magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 36 patients. MRI-PDFF involved a 3-dimensional T2*-weighted with Dixon pulse multiple-echo sequence using iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least squares estimation (IDEAL IQ). QUS imaging relied on the ultrasound system “RS85 A” (Samsung Medison, Seoul, South Korea) and the following software: Hepato-Renal Index with automated region of interest recommendation (EzHRI), Tissue Attenuation Imaging (TAI), and Tissue Scatter Distribution Imaging (TSI). For each QUS index, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis against MRI-PDFF was used to identify the associated cut-off value and the area under the ROC curve (AUROC). Concordance between two radiologists was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland–Altman analysis. RESULTS: A total of 61.1% of the sample (n=22) displayed a MRI-PDFF ≥ 5.6%; QUS cut-off values were TAI=0.625 (AUROC 0.90, confidence interval [CI] 0.77–1.00), TSI=91.95 (AUROC 0.99, CI 0.98–1.00) and EzHRI=1.215 (AUROC 0.98, CI 0.94–1.00). Inter-rater reliability was good-to-excellent for EzHRI (ICC 0.91, 95% C.I. 0.82–0.95) and TAI (ICC 0.94, 95% C.I. 0.88–0.97) and moderate to good for TSI (ICC 0.73; 95% C.I. 0.53–0.85). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that QUS can be used to reliably assess the presence and degree of pediatric hepatic steatosis. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary material is available at 10.1007/s00247-023-05749-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-09-12 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10635941/ /pubmed/37698614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-023-05749-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Polti, Giorgia
Frigerio, Francesco
Del Gaudio, Giovanni
Pacini, Patrizia
Dolcetti, Vincenzo
Renda, Maurizio
Angeletti, Sergio
Di Martino, Michele
Iannetti, Giovanni
Perla, Francesco Massimo
Poggiogalle, Eleonora
Cantisani, Vito
Quantitative ultrasound fatty liver evaluation in a pediatric population: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging of liver proton density fat fraction
title Quantitative ultrasound fatty liver evaluation in a pediatric population: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging of liver proton density fat fraction
title_full Quantitative ultrasound fatty liver evaluation in a pediatric population: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging of liver proton density fat fraction
title_fullStr Quantitative ultrasound fatty liver evaluation in a pediatric population: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging of liver proton density fat fraction
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative ultrasound fatty liver evaluation in a pediatric population: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging of liver proton density fat fraction
title_short Quantitative ultrasound fatty liver evaluation in a pediatric population: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging of liver proton density fat fraction
title_sort quantitative ultrasound fatty liver evaluation in a pediatric population: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging of liver proton density fat fraction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37698614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-023-05749-9
work_keys_str_mv AT poltigiorgia quantitativeultrasoundfattyliverevaluationinapediatricpopulationcomparisonwithmagneticresonanceimagingofliverprotondensityfatfraction
AT frigeriofrancesco quantitativeultrasoundfattyliverevaluationinapediatricpopulationcomparisonwithmagneticresonanceimagingofliverprotondensityfatfraction
AT delgaudiogiovanni quantitativeultrasoundfattyliverevaluationinapediatricpopulationcomparisonwithmagneticresonanceimagingofliverprotondensityfatfraction
AT pacinipatrizia quantitativeultrasoundfattyliverevaluationinapediatricpopulationcomparisonwithmagneticresonanceimagingofliverprotondensityfatfraction
AT dolcettivincenzo quantitativeultrasoundfattyliverevaluationinapediatricpopulationcomparisonwithmagneticresonanceimagingofliverprotondensityfatfraction
AT rendamaurizio quantitativeultrasoundfattyliverevaluationinapediatricpopulationcomparisonwithmagneticresonanceimagingofliverprotondensityfatfraction
AT angelettisergio quantitativeultrasoundfattyliverevaluationinapediatricpopulationcomparisonwithmagneticresonanceimagingofliverprotondensityfatfraction
AT dimartinomichele quantitativeultrasoundfattyliverevaluationinapediatricpopulationcomparisonwithmagneticresonanceimagingofliverprotondensityfatfraction
AT iannettigiovanni quantitativeultrasoundfattyliverevaluationinapediatricpopulationcomparisonwithmagneticresonanceimagingofliverprotondensityfatfraction
AT perlafrancescomassimo quantitativeultrasoundfattyliverevaluationinapediatricpopulationcomparisonwithmagneticresonanceimagingofliverprotondensityfatfraction
AT poggiogalleeleonora quantitativeultrasoundfattyliverevaluationinapediatricpopulationcomparisonwithmagneticresonanceimagingofliverprotondensityfatfraction
AT cantisanivito quantitativeultrasoundfattyliverevaluationinapediatricpopulationcomparisonwithmagneticresonanceimagingofliverprotondensityfatfraction