Cargando…

Neglect dyslexia: whole-word and within-word errors with parafoveal and foveal viewing

Patients with left-sided neglect dyslexia often omit whole words positioned on the left, termed whole-word errors, or commit errors on the left-sided letters of words, termed unilateral paralexias. In addition, the errors have been shown to be exacerbated by simultaneously presented distractors, whi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rich, Timothy J., Palmer, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37773416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-023-06708-4
_version_ 1785146393967460352
author Rich, Timothy J.
Palmer, John
author_facet Rich, Timothy J.
Palmer, John
author_sort Rich, Timothy J.
collection PubMed
description Patients with left-sided neglect dyslexia often omit whole words positioned on the left, termed whole-word errors, or commit errors on the left-sided letters of words, termed unilateral paralexias. In addition, the errors have been shown to be exacerbated by simultaneously presented distractors, which has been interpreted as a failure of selective attention. In two experiments, we examined the dependency of these error types on parafoveal versus foveal viewing. The first experiment used a paradigm with parafoveal targets and distractors; the second a paradigm with foveal targets and parafoveal distractors. This enabled a separate evaluation of the influences of stimulus position within an egocentric frame, a two-word allocentric frame, and a within-word allocentric frame. First, regarding whole-word errors, we found the expected spatial and distractor effects with parafoveal targets and distractors. With foveal targets and parafoveal distractors, however, the spatial effect was effectively eliminated. Surprisingly, intrusions from the distractor word were common in distractor conditions. This is consistent with an egocentric account and not a two-word allocentric account. Second, we found that unilateral paralexias remained largely consistent regardless of spatial position or the presence of a distractor. Thus, there is a contrast in spatial and distractor effects between whole-word errors and unilateral paralexias. These results are consistent with three distinct deficits: an egocentric deficit across space resulting in whole-word errors, a failure of selective attention that results in whole-word intrusion errors, and a within-word allocentric deficit resulting in unilateral paralexias.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10635956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106359562023-11-14 Neglect dyslexia: whole-word and within-word errors with parafoveal and foveal viewing Rich, Timothy J. Palmer, John Exp Brain Res Research Article Patients with left-sided neglect dyslexia often omit whole words positioned on the left, termed whole-word errors, or commit errors on the left-sided letters of words, termed unilateral paralexias. In addition, the errors have been shown to be exacerbated by simultaneously presented distractors, which has been interpreted as a failure of selective attention. In two experiments, we examined the dependency of these error types on parafoveal versus foveal viewing. The first experiment used a paradigm with parafoveal targets and distractors; the second a paradigm with foveal targets and parafoveal distractors. This enabled a separate evaluation of the influences of stimulus position within an egocentric frame, a two-word allocentric frame, and a within-word allocentric frame. First, regarding whole-word errors, we found the expected spatial and distractor effects with parafoveal targets and distractors. With foveal targets and parafoveal distractors, however, the spatial effect was effectively eliminated. Surprisingly, intrusions from the distractor word were common in distractor conditions. This is consistent with an egocentric account and not a two-word allocentric account. Second, we found that unilateral paralexias remained largely consistent regardless of spatial position or the presence of a distractor. Thus, there is a contrast in spatial and distractor effects between whole-word errors and unilateral paralexias. These results are consistent with three distinct deficits: an egocentric deficit across space resulting in whole-word errors, a failure of selective attention that results in whole-word intrusion errors, and a within-word allocentric deficit resulting in unilateral paralexias. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-09-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10635956/ /pubmed/37773416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-023-06708-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Rich, Timothy J.
Palmer, John
Neglect dyslexia: whole-word and within-word errors with parafoveal and foveal viewing
title Neglect dyslexia: whole-word and within-word errors with parafoveal and foveal viewing
title_full Neglect dyslexia: whole-word and within-word errors with parafoveal and foveal viewing
title_fullStr Neglect dyslexia: whole-word and within-word errors with parafoveal and foveal viewing
title_full_unstemmed Neglect dyslexia: whole-word and within-word errors with parafoveal and foveal viewing
title_short Neglect dyslexia: whole-word and within-word errors with parafoveal and foveal viewing
title_sort neglect dyslexia: whole-word and within-word errors with parafoveal and foveal viewing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37773416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-023-06708-4
work_keys_str_mv AT richtimothyj neglectdyslexiawholewordandwithinworderrorswithparafovealandfovealviewing
AT palmerjohn neglectdyslexiawholewordandwithinworderrorswithparafovealandfovealviewing