Cargando…

Comparison of cementless twin-peg, cemented twin-peg and cemented single-peg femoral component migration after medial unicompartmental knee replacement: a 5-year randomized RSA study

BACKGROUND: The component design and fixation method of joint arthroplasty may affect component migration and survival. The aim of this study was to compare fixation of cementless twin-peg (CLTP), cemented twin-peg (CTP) and cemented single-peg (CSP) femoral components of medial unicompartmental kne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mosegaard, Sebastian Breddam, Odgaard, Anders, Madsen, Frank, Rømer, Lone, Kristensen, Per Wagner, Vind, Tobias Dahl, Søballe, Kjeld, Stilling, Maiken
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04991-y
_version_ 1785146396312076288
author Mosegaard, Sebastian Breddam
Odgaard, Anders
Madsen, Frank
Rømer, Lone
Kristensen, Per Wagner
Vind, Tobias Dahl
Søballe, Kjeld
Stilling, Maiken
author_facet Mosegaard, Sebastian Breddam
Odgaard, Anders
Madsen, Frank
Rømer, Lone
Kristensen, Per Wagner
Vind, Tobias Dahl
Søballe, Kjeld
Stilling, Maiken
author_sort Mosegaard, Sebastian Breddam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The component design and fixation method of joint arthroplasty may affect component migration and survival. The aim of this study was to compare fixation of cementless twin-peg (CLTP), cemented twin-peg (CTP) and cemented single-peg (CSP) femoral components of medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). METHODS: Eighty patients (mean age = 63 years, 48 males) with medial knee osteoarthritis were randomized in three ways to CLTP (n = 25), CTP (n = 26) or CSP (n = 29) femoral UKR components. The patients were followed 5 years postoperatively with RSA, bone mineral density (BMD), PROMs and radiological evaluation of radiolucent lines (RLL), femoral component flexion angle and complications. RESULTS: At the 5-year follow-up, femoral component total translation was comparable between the three groups (p = 0.60). Femoral component internal rotation was 0.50° (95% CI 0.3; 0.69) for the CLTP group, 0.58° (95% CI 0.38; 0.77) for the CTP group and 0.25° (95% CI 0.07; 0.43) for the CSP group (p = 0.01). BMD decreased peri-prosthetically (range − 11.5%; − 14.0%) until 6-month follow-up and increased toward the 5-year follow-up (range − 3.6%; − 5.8%). BMD change did not correlate with component migration. Lower flexion angle was correlated with higher 5-year subsidence, total translation, varus rotation and maximum total point motion (p = 0.01). Two patients (1 CLTP, 1 CTP) had RLL in the posterior zone. There were two revisions. CONCLUSION: At 5-year follow-up, fixation of UKA femoral components with twin-peg was not superior to the single-peg design. Cementless and cemented twin-peg femoral components had similar fixation. A lower flexion angle was correlated with higher component migration. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00402-023-04991-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10635966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106359662023-11-14 Comparison of cementless twin-peg, cemented twin-peg and cemented single-peg femoral component migration after medial unicompartmental knee replacement: a 5-year randomized RSA study Mosegaard, Sebastian Breddam Odgaard, Anders Madsen, Frank Rømer, Lone Kristensen, Per Wagner Vind, Tobias Dahl Søballe, Kjeld Stilling, Maiken Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Knee Arthroplasty BACKGROUND: The component design and fixation method of joint arthroplasty may affect component migration and survival. The aim of this study was to compare fixation of cementless twin-peg (CLTP), cemented twin-peg (CTP) and cemented single-peg (CSP) femoral components of medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). METHODS: Eighty patients (mean age = 63 years, 48 males) with medial knee osteoarthritis were randomized in three ways to CLTP (n = 25), CTP (n = 26) or CSP (n = 29) femoral UKR components. The patients were followed 5 years postoperatively with RSA, bone mineral density (BMD), PROMs and radiological evaluation of radiolucent lines (RLL), femoral component flexion angle and complications. RESULTS: At the 5-year follow-up, femoral component total translation was comparable between the three groups (p = 0.60). Femoral component internal rotation was 0.50° (95% CI 0.3; 0.69) for the CLTP group, 0.58° (95% CI 0.38; 0.77) for the CTP group and 0.25° (95% CI 0.07; 0.43) for the CSP group (p = 0.01). BMD decreased peri-prosthetically (range − 11.5%; − 14.0%) until 6-month follow-up and increased toward the 5-year follow-up (range − 3.6%; − 5.8%). BMD change did not correlate with component migration. Lower flexion angle was correlated with higher 5-year subsidence, total translation, varus rotation and maximum total point motion (p = 0.01). Two patients (1 CLTP, 1 CTP) had RLL in the posterior zone. There were two revisions. CONCLUSION: At 5-year follow-up, fixation of UKA femoral components with twin-peg was not superior to the single-peg design. Cementless and cemented twin-peg femoral components had similar fixation. A lower flexion angle was correlated with higher component migration. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00402-023-04991-y. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-08-11 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10635966/ /pubmed/37568057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04991-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Knee Arthroplasty
Mosegaard, Sebastian Breddam
Odgaard, Anders
Madsen, Frank
Rømer, Lone
Kristensen, Per Wagner
Vind, Tobias Dahl
Søballe, Kjeld
Stilling, Maiken
Comparison of cementless twin-peg, cemented twin-peg and cemented single-peg femoral component migration after medial unicompartmental knee replacement: a 5-year randomized RSA study
title Comparison of cementless twin-peg, cemented twin-peg and cemented single-peg femoral component migration after medial unicompartmental knee replacement: a 5-year randomized RSA study
title_full Comparison of cementless twin-peg, cemented twin-peg and cemented single-peg femoral component migration after medial unicompartmental knee replacement: a 5-year randomized RSA study
title_fullStr Comparison of cementless twin-peg, cemented twin-peg and cemented single-peg femoral component migration after medial unicompartmental knee replacement: a 5-year randomized RSA study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of cementless twin-peg, cemented twin-peg and cemented single-peg femoral component migration after medial unicompartmental knee replacement: a 5-year randomized RSA study
title_short Comparison of cementless twin-peg, cemented twin-peg and cemented single-peg femoral component migration after medial unicompartmental knee replacement: a 5-year randomized RSA study
title_sort comparison of cementless twin-peg, cemented twin-peg and cemented single-peg femoral component migration after medial unicompartmental knee replacement: a 5-year randomized rsa study
topic Knee Arthroplasty
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04991-y
work_keys_str_mv AT mosegaardsebastianbreddam comparisonofcementlesstwinpegcementedtwinpegandcementedsinglepegfemoralcomponentmigrationaftermedialunicompartmentalkneereplacementa5yearrandomizedrsastudy
AT odgaardanders comparisonofcementlesstwinpegcementedtwinpegandcementedsinglepegfemoralcomponentmigrationaftermedialunicompartmentalkneereplacementa5yearrandomizedrsastudy
AT madsenfrank comparisonofcementlesstwinpegcementedtwinpegandcementedsinglepegfemoralcomponentmigrationaftermedialunicompartmentalkneereplacementa5yearrandomizedrsastudy
AT rømerlone comparisonofcementlesstwinpegcementedtwinpegandcementedsinglepegfemoralcomponentmigrationaftermedialunicompartmentalkneereplacementa5yearrandomizedrsastudy
AT kristensenperwagner comparisonofcementlesstwinpegcementedtwinpegandcementedsinglepegfemoralcomponentmigrationaftermedialunicompartmentalkneereplacementa5yearrandomizedrsastudy
AT vindtobiasdahl comparisonofcementlesstwinpegcementedtwinpegandcementedsinglepegfemoralcomponentmigrationaftermedialunicompartmentalkneereplacementa5yearrandomizedrsastudy
AT søballekjeld comparisonofcementlesstwinpegcementedtwinpegandcementedsinglepegfemoralcomponentmigrationaftermedialunicompartmentalkneereplacementa5yearrandomizedrsastudy
AT stillingmaiken comparisonofcementlesstwinpegcementedtwinpegandcementedsinglepegfemoralcomponentmigrationaftermedialunicompartmentalkneereplacementa5yearrandomizedrsastudy