Cargando…

Cost Effectiveness and Budget Impact of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Platinum Plus Pemetrexed (with and Without Bevacizumab) in Patients with Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in Switzerland

BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural mesotheliomas (MPMs) are aggressive and often unresectable. In the past, chemotherapy was the standard for palliative treatment. However, immunotherapy with nivolumab+ipilimumab has recently received marketing approval. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the cost effectiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barbier, Michaela Carla, Fengler, Alicia, Pardo, Esther, Bhadhuri, Arjun, Meier, Niklaus, Gautschi, Oliver
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37572261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-023-01305-3
_version_ 1785146399766085632
author Barbier, Michaela Carla
Fengler, Alicia
Pardo, Esther
Bhadhuri, Arjun
Meier, Niklaus
Gautschi, Oliver
author_facet Barbier, Michaela Carla
Fengler, Alicia
Pardo, Esther
Bhadhuri, Arjun
Meier, Niklaus
Gautschi, Oliver
author_sort Barbier, Michaela Carla
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural mesotheliomas (MPMs) are aggressive and often unresectable. In the past, chemotherapy was the standard for palliative treatment. However, immunotherapy with nivolumab+ipilimumab has recently received marketing approval. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the cost effectiveness of nivolumab+ipilimumab versus pemetrexed+platinum (with/without bevacizumab) for Swiss patients with unresectable MPM, overall and by histological subtype. METHODS: We developed a three-state Markov cohort model with a cycle length of 1 month, a 30-year time horizon, and a discount rate of 3% per year for costs and benefits. The model included the updated survival and treatment-dependent utility results from the Checkmate-743 and MAPS registration trials. A Swiss statutory health insurance perspective was considered with unit costs for 2022 from publicly available and real-world sources. We assumed a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of CHF100,000/QALY. Model robustness was explored in sensitivity and scenario analyses. RESULTS: Compared with chemotherapy, nivolumab+ipilimumab incurred additional costs of CHF109,115 and 0.57 additional quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of CHF192,585/QALY (i.e. USD201,829/QALY) gained. Relative to their 2022 list price, nivolumab+ipilimumab may be cost effective if priced at 48% across all histologies. Assuming cisplatin-based instead of carboplatin-based chemotherapy reduced the ICER to CHF158,911/QALY (i.e. USD166,539/QALY). For the non-epithelioid subtype, nivolumab+ipilimumab was cost effective compared with chemotherapy (ICER of CHF97,894/QALY, i.e. USD102,593/QALY). Chemotherapy+bevacizumab was often a dominated strategy or would require a bevacizumab cost reduction to 28%. CONCLUSIONS: Our model projected nivolumab+ipilimumab to be cost effective for the non-epithelioid subtype but not for all histologies. Substantial discounts for nivolumab+ipilimumab would be necessary to achieve cost effectiveness for all histologies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40273-023-01305-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10635986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106359862023-11-14 Cost Effectiveness and Budget Impact of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Platinum Plus Pemetrexed (with and Without Bevacizumab) in Patients with Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in Switzerland Barbier, Michaela Carla Fengler, Alicia Pardo, Esther Bhadhuri, Arjun Meier, Niklaus Gautschi, Oliver Pharmacoeconomics Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural mesotheliomas (MPMs) are aggressive and often unresectable. In the past, chemotherapy was the standard for palliative treatment. However, immunotherapy with nivolumab+ipilimumab has recently received marketing approval. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the cost effectiveness of nivolumab+ipilimumab versus pemetrexed+platinum (with/without bevacizumab) for Swiss patients with unresectable MPM, overall and by histological subtype. METHODS: We developed a three-state Markov cohort model with a cycle length of 1 month, a 30-year time horizon, and a discount rate of 3% per year for costs and benefits. The model included the updated survival and treatment-dependent utility results from the Checkmate-743 and MAPS registration trials. A Swiss statutory health insurance perspective was considered with unit costs for 2022 from publicly available and real-world sources. We assumed a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of CHF100,000/QALY. Model robustness was explored in sensitivity and scenario analyses. RESULTS: Compared with chemotherapy, nivolumab+ipilimumab incurred additional costs of CHF109,115 and 0.57 additional quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of CHF192,585/QALY (i.e. USD201,829/QALY) gained. Relative to their 2022 list price, nivolumab+ipilimumab may be cost effective if priced at 48% across all histologies. Assuming cisplatin-based instead of carboplatin-based chemotherapy reduced the ICER to CHF158,911/QALY (i.e. USD166,539/QALY). For the non-epithelioid subtype, nivolumab+ipilimumab was cost effective compared with chemotherapy (ICER of CHF97,894/QALY, i.e. USD102,593/QALY). Chemotherapy+bevacizumab was often a dominated strategy or would require a bevacizumab cost reduction to 28%. CONCLUSIONS: Our model projected nivolumab+ipilimumab to be cost effective for the non-epithelioid subtype but not for all histologies. Substantial discounts for nivolumab+ipilimumab would be necessary to achieve cost effectiveness for all histologies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40273-023-01305-3. Springer International Publishing 2023-08-12 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10635986/ /pubmed/37572261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-023-01305-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Barbier, Michaela Carla
Fengler, Alicia
Pardo, Esther
Bhadhuri, Arjun
Meier, Niklaus
Gautschi, Oliver
Cost Effectiveness and Budget Impact of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Platinum Plus Pemetrexed (with and Without Bevacizumab) in Patients with Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in Switzerland
title Cost Effectiveness and Budget Impact of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Platinum Plus Pemetrexed (with and Without Bevacizumab) in Patients with Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in Switzerland
title_full Cost Effectiveness and Budget Impact of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Platinum Plus Pemetrexed (with and Without Bevacizumab) in Patients with Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in Switzerland
title_fullStr Cost Effectiveness and Budget Impact of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Platinum Plus Pemetrexed (with and Without Bevacizumab) in Patients with Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in Switzerland
title_full_unstemmed Cost Effectiveness and Budget Impact of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Platinum Plus Pemetrexed (with and Without Bevacizumab) in Patients with Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in Switzerland
title_short Cost Effectiveness and Budget Impact of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Platinum Plus Pemetrexed (with and Without Bevacizumab) in Patients with Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in Switzerland
title_sort cost effectiveness and budget impact of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus platinum plus pemetrexed (with and without bevacizumab) in patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma in switzerland
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37572261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-023-01305-3
work_keys_str_mv AT barbiermichaelacarla costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactofnivolumabplusipilimumabversusplatinumpluspemetrexedwithandwithoutbevacizumabinpatientswithunresectablemalignantpleuralmesotheliomainswitzerland
AT fengleralicia costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactofnivolumabplusipilimumabversusplatinumpluspemetrexedwithandwithoutbevacizumabinpatientswithunresectablemalignantpleuralmesotheliomainswitzerland
AT pardoesther costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactofnivolumabplusipilimumabversusplatinumpluspemetrexedwithandwithoutbevacizumabinpatientswithunresectablemalignantpleuralmesotheliomainswitzerland
AT bhadhuriarjun costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactofnivolumabplusipilimumabversusplatinumpluspemetrexedwithandwithoutbevacizumabinpatientswithunresectablemalignantpleuralmesotheliomainswitzerland
AT meierniklaus costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactofnivolumabplusipilimumabversusplatinumpluspemetrexedwithandwithoutbevacizumabinpatientswithunresectablemalignantpleuralmesotheliomainswitzerland
AT gautschioliver costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactofnivolumabplusipilimumabversusplatinumpluspemetrexedwithandwithoutbevacizumabinpatientswithunresectablemalignantpleuralmesotheliomainswitzerland