Cargando…

The grade of individual prostate cancer lesions predicted by magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography

BACKGROUND: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) are widely used for the management of prostate cancer (PCa). However, how these modalities complement each other in PCa risk stratification is still largely unknown. We aim to provide insights into...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nilsson, Erik, Sandgren, Kristina, Grefve, Josefine, Jonsson, Joakim, Axelsson, Jan, Lindberg, Angsana Keeratijarut, Söderkvist, Karin, Karlsson, Camilla Thellenberg, Widmark, Anders, Blomqvist, Lennart, Strandberg, Sara, Riklund, Katrine, Bergh, Anders, Nyholm, Tufve
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10636013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37945817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43856-023-00394-7
_version_ 1785133119213404160
author Nilsson, Erik
Sandgren, Kristina
Grefve, Josefine
Jonsson, Joakim
Axelsson, Jan
Lindberg, Angsana Keeratijarut
Söderkvist, Karin
Karlsson, Camilla Thellenberg
Widmark, Anders
Blomqvist, Lennart
Strandberg, Sara
Riklund, Katrine
Bergh, Anders
Nyholm, Tufve
author_facet Nilsson, Erik
Sandgren, Kristina
Grefve, Josefine
Jonsson, Joakim
Axelsson, Jan
Lindberg, Angsana Keeratijarut
Söderkvist, Karin
Karlsson, Camilla Thellenberg
Widmark, Anders
Blomqvist, Lennart
Strandberg, Sara
Riklund, Katrine
Bergh, Anders
Nyholm, Tufve
author_sort Nilsson, Erik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) are widely used for the management of prostate cancer (PCa). However, how these modalities complement each other in PCa risk stratification is still largely unknown. We aim to provide insights into the potential of mpMRI and PET for PCa risk stratification. METHODS: We analyzed data from 55 consecutive patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen and biopsy-proven PCa enrolled in a prospective study between December 2016 and December 2019. [(68)Ga]PSMA-11 PET (PSMA-PET), [(11)C]Acetate PET (Acetate-PET) and mpMRI were co-registered with whole-mount histopathology. Lower- and higher-grade lesions were defined by International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade groups (IGG). We used PET and mpMRI data to differentiate between grades in two cases: IGG 3 vs. IGG 2 (case 1) and IGG ≥ 3 vs. IGG ≤ 2 (case 2). The performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: We find that the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) for PSMA-PET achieves the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC), with AUCs of 0.72 (case 1) and 0.79 (case 2). Combining the volume transfer constant, apparent diffusion coefficient and T2-weighted images (each normalized to non-malignant prostatic tissue) results in AUCs of 0.70 (case 1) and 0.70 (case 2). Adding PSMA-SUV(max) increases the AUCs by 0.09 (p < 0.01) and 0.12 (p < 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: By co-registering whole-mount histopathology and in-vivo imaging we show that mpMRI and PET can distinguish between lower- and higher-grade prostate cancer, using partially discriminative cut-off values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10636013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106360132023-11-11 The grade of individual prostate cancer lesions predicted by magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography Nilsson, Erik Sandgren, Kristina Grefve, Josefine Jonsson, Joakim Axelsson, Jan Lindberg, Angsana Keeratijarut Söderkvist, Karin Karlsson, Camilla Thellenberg Widmark, Anders Blomqvist, Lennart Strandberg, Sara Riklund, Katrine Bergh, Anders Nyholm, Tufve Commun Med (Lond) Article BACKGROUND: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) are widely used for the management of prostate cancer (PCa). However, how these modalities complement each other in PCa risk stratification is still largely unknown. We aim to provide insights into the potential of mpMRI and PET for PCa risk stratification. METHODS: We analyzed data from 55 consecutive patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen and biopsy-proven PCa enrolled in a prospective study between December 2016 and December 2019. [(68)Ga]PSMA-11 PET (PSMA-PET), [(11)C]Acetate PET (Acetate-PET) and mpMRI were co-registered with whole-mount histopathology. Lower- and higher-grade lesions were defined by International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade groups (IGG). We used PET and mpMRI data to differentiate between grades in two cases: IGG 3 vs. IGG 2 (case 1) and IGG ≥ 3 vs. IGG ≤ 2 (case 2). The performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: We find that the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) for PSMA-PET achieves the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC), with AUCs of 0.72 (case 1) and 0.79 (case 2). Combining the volume transfer constant, apparent diffusion coefficient and T2-weighted images (each normalized to non-malignant prostatic tissue) results in AUCs of 0.70 (case 1) and 0.70 (case 2). Adding PSMA-SUV(max) increases the AUCs by 0.09 (p < 0.01) and 0.12 (p < 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: By co-registering whole-mount histopathology and in-vivo imaging we show that mpMRI and PET can distinguish between lower- and higher-grade prostate cancer, using partially discriminative cut-off values. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10636013/ /pubmed/37945817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43856-023-00394-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Nilsson, Erik
Sandgren, Kristina
Grefve, Josefine
Jonsson, Joakim
Axelsson, Jan
Lindberg, Angsana Keeratijarut
Söderkvist, Karin
Karlsson, Camilla Thellenberg
Widmark, Anders
Blomqvist, Lennart
Strandberg, Sara
Riklund, Katrine
Bergh, Anders
Nyholm, Tufve
The grade of individual prostate cancer lesions predicted by magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography
title The grade of individual prostate cancer lesions predicted by magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography
title_full The grade of individual prostate cancer lesions predicted by magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography
title_fullStr The grade of individual prostate cancer lesions predicted by magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography
title_full_unstemmed The grade of individual prostate cancer lesions predicted by magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography
title_short The grade of individual prostate cancer lesions predicted by magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography
title_sort grade of individual prostate cancer lesions predicted by magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10636013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37945817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43856-023-00394-7
work_keys_str_mv AT nilssonerik thegradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT sandgrenkristina thegradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT grefvejosefine thegradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT jonssonjoakim thegradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT axelssonjan thegradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT lindbergangsanakeeratijarut thegradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT soderkvistkarin thegradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT karlssoncamillathellenberg thegradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT widmarkanders thegradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT blomqvistlennart thegradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT strandbergsara thegradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT riklundkatrine thegradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT berghanders thegradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT nyholmtufve thegradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT nilssonerik gradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT sandgrenkristina gradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT grefvejosefine gradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT jonssonjoakim gradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT axelssonjan gradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT lindbergangsanakeeratijarut gradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT soderkvistkarin gradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT karlssoncamillathellenberg gradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT widmarkanders gradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT blomqvistlennart gradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT strandbergsara gradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT riklundkatrine gradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT berghanders gradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography
AT nyholmtufve gradeofindividualprostatecancerlesionspredictedbymagneticresonanceimagingandpositronemissiontomography