Cargando…

Fast relocking and afterslip-seismicity evolution following the 2015 Mw 8.3 Illapel earthquake in Chile

Large subduction earthquakes induce complex postseismic deformation, primarily driven by afterslip and viscoelastic relaxation, in addition to interplate relocking processes. However, these signals are intricately intertwined, posing challenges in determining the timing and nature of relocking. Here...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hormazábal, Joaquín, Moreno, Marcos, Ortega-Culaciati, Francisco, Báez, Juan Carlos, Peña, Carlos, Sippl, Christian, González-Vidal, Diego, Ruiz, Javier, Metzger, Sabrina, Yoshioka, Shoichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10636185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37945656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45369-9
_version_ 1785133159758692352
author Hormazábal, Joaquín
Moreno, Marcos
Ortega-Culaciati, Francisco
Báez, Juan Carlos
Peña, Carlos
Sippl, Christian
González-Vidal, Diego
Ruiz, Javier
Metzger, Sabrina
Yoshioka, Shoichi
author_facet Hormazábal, Joaquín
Moreno, Marcos
Ortega-Culaciati, Francisco
Báez, Juan Carlos
Peña, Carlos
Sippl, Christian
González-Vidal, Diego
Ruiz, Javier
Metzger, Sabrina
Yoshioka, Shoichi
author_sort Hormazábal, Joaquín
collection PubMed
description Large subduction earthquakes induce complex postseismic deformation, primarily driven by afterslip and viscoelastic relaxation, in addition to interplate relocking processes. However, these signals are intricately intertwined, posing challenges in determining the timing and nature of relocking. Here, we use six years of continuous GNSS measurements (2015–2021) to study the spatiotemporal evolution of afterslip, seismicity and locking after the 2015 Illapel earthquake ([Formula: see text] 8.3). Afterslip is inverted from postseismic displacements corrected for nonlinear viscoelastic relaxation modeled using a power-law rheology, and the distribution of locking is obtained from the linear trend of GNSS stations. Our results show that afterslip is mainly concentrated in two zones surrounding the region of largest coseismic slip. The accumulated afterslip (corresponding to [Formula: see text] 7.8) exceeds 1.5 m, with aftershocks mainly occurring at the boundaries of the afterslip patches. Our results reveal that the region experiencing the largest coseismic slip undergoes rapid relocking, exhibiting the behavior of a persistent velocity weakening asperity, with no observed aftershocks or afterslip within this region during the observed period. The rapid relocking of this asperity may explain the almost regular recurrence time of earthquakes in this region, as similar events occurred in 1880 and 1943.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10636185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106361852023-11-11 Fast relocking and afterslip-seismicity evolution following the 2015 Mw 8.3 Illapel earthquake in Chile Hormazábal, Joaquín Moreno, Marcos Ortega-Culaciati, Francisco Báez, Juan Carlos Peña, Carlos Sippl, Christian González-Vidal, Diego Ruiz, Javier Metzger, Sabrina Yoshioka, Shoichi Sci Rep Article Large subduction earthquakes induce complex postseismic deformation, primarily driven by afterslip and viscoelastic relaxation, in addition to interplate relocking processes. However, these signals are intricately intertwined, posing challenges in determining the timing and nature of relocking. Here, we use six years of continuous GNSS measurements (2015–2021) to study the spatiotemporal evolution of afterslip, seismicity and locking after the 2015 Illapel earthquake ([Formula: see text] 8.3). Afterslip is inverted from postseismic displacements corrected for nonlinear viscoelastic relaxation modeled using a power-law rheology, and the distribution of locking is obtained from the linear trend of GNSS stations. Our results show that afterslip is mainly concentrated in two zones surrounding the region of largest coseismic slip. The accumulated afterslip (corresponding to [Formula: see text] 7.8) exceeds 1.5 m, with aftershocks mainly occurring at the boundaries of the afterslip patches. Our results reveal that the region experiencing the largest coseismic slip undergoes rapid relocking, exhibiting the behavior of a persistent velocity weakening asperity, with no observed aftershocks or afterslip within this region during the observed period. The rapid relocking of this asperity may explain the almost regular recurrence time of earthquakes in this region, as similar events occurred in 1880 and 1943. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10636185/ /pubmed/37945656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45369-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Hormazábal, Joaquín
Moreno, Marcos
Ortega-Culaciati, Francisco
Báez, Juan Carlos
Peña, Carlos
Sippl, Christian
González-Vidal, Diego
Ruiz, Javier
Metzger, Sabrina
Yoshioka, Shoichi
Fast relocking and afterslip-seismicity evolution following the 2015 Mw 8.3 Illapel earthquake in Chile
title Fast relocking and afterslip-seismicity evolution following the 2015 Mw 8.3 Illapel earthquake in Chile
title_full Fast relocking and afterslip-seismicity evolution following the 2015 Mw 8.3 Illapel earthquake in Chile
title_fullStr Fast relocking and afterslip-seismicity evolution following the 2015 Mw 8.3 Illapel earthquake in Chile
title_full_unstemmed Fast relocking and afterslip-seismicity evolution following the 2015 Mw 8.3 Illapel earthquake in Chile
title_short Fast relocking and afterslip-seismicity evolution following the 2015 Mw 8.3 Illapel earthquake in Chile
title_sort fast relocking and afterslip-seismicity evolution following the 2015 mw 8.3 illapel earthquake in chile
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10636185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37945656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45369-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hormazabaljoaquin fastrelockingandafterslipseismicityevolutionfollowingthe2015mw83illapelearthquakeinchile
AT morenomarcos fastrelockingandafterslipseismicityevolutionfollowingthe2015mw83illapelearthquakeinchile
AT ortegaculaciatifrancisco fastrelockingandafterslipseismicityevolutionfollowingthe2015mw83illapelearthquakeinchile
AT baezjuancarlos fastrelockingandafterslipseismicityevolutionfollowingthe2015mw83illapelearthquakeinchile
AT penacarlos fastrelockingandafterslipseismicityevolutionfollowingthe2015mw83illapelearthquakeinchile
AT sipplchristian fastrelockingandafterslipseismicityevolutionfollowingthe2015mw83illapelearthquakeinchile
AT gonzalezvidaldiego fastrelockingandafterslipseismicityevolutionfollowingthe2015mw83illapelearthquakeinchile
AT ruizjavier fastrelockingandafterslipseismicityevolutionfollowingthe2015mw83illapelearthquakeinchile
AT metzgersabrina fastrelockingandafterslipseismicityevolutionfollowingthe2015mw83illapelearthquakeinchile
AT yoshiokashoichi fastrelockingandafterslipseismicityevolutionfollowingthe2015mw83illapelearthquakeinchile