Cargando…

Can action tendencies be counteracted by inducing incompatible emotions? Considering instances of anxiety and anger

BACKGROUND: The incompatible response hypothesis suggests that emotions and other affective states can counteract each other when incompatible. With the present study, we focused on two negative emotions (anger and anxiety) associated with different action tendencies (approach vs. avoidance). Specif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elkjær, Emma, Kuppens, Peter, Mikkelsen, Mai B., O'Toole, Mia S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10636385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37679879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3247
_version_ 1785146419312590848
author Elkjær, Emma
Kuppens, Peter
Mikkelsen, Mai B.
O'Toole, Mia S.
author_facet Elkjær, Emma
Kuppens, Peter
Mikkelsen, Mai B.
O'Toole, Mia S.
author_sort Elkjær, Emma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The incompatible response hypothesis suggests that emotions and other affective states can counteract each other when incompatible. With the present study, we focused on two negative emotions (anger and anxiety) associated with different action tendencies (approach vs. avoidance). Specifically, we wanted to investigate if an anxiety manipulation, subsequent to an anger manipulation, would show a counteracting effect of the approach action tendencies associated with the initial anger manipulation and vice versa for anxiety and avoidance tendencies. METHODS: We conducted a preregistered online experiment (N = 173). We evaluated changes from when the individual (1) was presented with a task in relation to a specific goal (e.g., anxiety induction: recordings of students’ view on climate changes), (2) received a subsequent emotion induction framed within an unrelated task and goal (e.g., anger induction: student feedback on changes to the economic student compensation system), (3) after which they were asked to return to the initial task (e.g., from the anger induction back to the anxiety induction). Primary outcomes included visual and verbal measures of action tendencies, and secondary outcomes included appraisals and emotion experience. RESULTS: The results showed no evidence of a counteractive effect by inducing emotions unrelated to the initial task and with incompatible action tendencies. Rather, results pointed to spill‐over effects, which should be seen in light of the anger conditions resulting not only in increase anger and irritability but also anxiety and nervousness. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of counteractive effects could be due to either the mixed emotions induced by the anger condition or the compatibility of motivational context (i.e., threat) of anxiety and anger. Future research needs to refine the incompatible response hypothesis, honing the ways in which incompatibility is needed for emotion alteration, for instance by investigating the role of the motivational context.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10636385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106363852023-11-15 Can action tendencies be counteracted by inducing incompatible emotions? Considering instances of anxiety and anger Elkjær, Emma Kuppens, Peter Mikkelsen, Mai B. O'Toole, Mia S. Brain Behav Original Articles BACKGROUND: The incompatible response hypothesis suggests that emotions and other affective states can counteract each other when incompatible. With the present study, we focused on two negative emotions (anger and anxiety) associated with different action tendencies (approach vs. avoidance). Specifically, we wanted to investigate if an anxiety manipulation, subsequent to an anger manipulation, would show a counteracting effect of the approach action tendencies associated with the initial anger manipulation and vice versa for anxiety and avoidance tendencies. METHODS: We conducted a preregistered online experiment (N = 173). We evaluated changes from when the individual (1) was presented with a task in relation to a specific goal (e.g., anxiety induction: recordings of students’ view on climate changes), (2) received a subsequent emotion induction framed within an unrelated task and goal (e.g., anger induction: student feedback on changes to the economic student compensation system), (3) after which they were asked to return to the initial task (e.g., from the anger induction back to the anxiety induction). Primary outcomes included visual and verbal measures of action tendencies, and secondary outcomes included appraisals and emotion experience. RESULTS: The results showed no evidence of a counteractive effect by inducing emotions unrelated to the initial task and with incompatible action tendencies. Rather, results pointed to spill‐over effects, which should be seen in light of the anger conditions resulting not only in increase anger and irritability but also anxiety and nervousness. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of counteractive effects could be due to either the mixed emotions induced by the anger condition or the compatibility of motivational context (i.e., threat) of anxiety and anger. Future research needs to refine the incompatible response hypothesis, honing the ways in which incompatibility is needed for emotion alteration, for instance by investigating the role of the motivational context. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10636385/ /pubmed/37679879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3247 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Elkjær, Emma
Kuppens, Peter
Mikkelsen, Mai B.
O'Toole, Mia S.
Can action tendencies be counteracted by inducing incompatible emotions? Considering instances of anxiety and anger
title Can action tendencies be counteracted by inducing incompatible emotions? Considering instances of anxiety and anger
title_full Can action tendencies be counteracted by inducing incompatible emotions? Considering instances of anxiety and anger
title_fullStr Can action tendencies be counteracted by inducing incompatible emotions? Considering instances of anxiety and anger
title_full_unstemmed Can action tendencies be counteracted by inducing incompatible emotions? Considering instances of anxiety and anger
title_short Can action tendencies be counteracted by inducing incompatible emotions? Considering instances of anxiety and anger
title_sort can action tendencies be counteracted by inducing incompatible emotions? considering instances of anxiety and anger
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10636385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37679879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3247
work_keys_str_mv AT elkjæremma canactiontendenciesbecounteractedbyinducingincompatibleemotionsconsideringinstancesofanxietyandanger
AT kuppenspeter canactiontendenciesbecounteractedbyinducingincompatibleemotionsconsideringinstancesofanxietyandanger
AT mikkelsenmaib canactiontendenciesbecounteractedbyinducingincompatibleemotionsconsideringinstancesofanxietyandanger
AT otoolemias canactiontendenciesbecounteractedbyinducingincompatibleemotionsconsideringinstancesofanxietyandanger