Cargando…

Impact of surgical margin after sublobar resection of lung cancer: a narrative review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The use of low-dose computed tomography for screening has improved the detection of early-stage lung cancers. In addition, two large clinical studies have recently reported good outcomes of sublobar resection for early-stage lung cancers, increasing the need for limited res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nagano, Masaaki, Sato, Masaaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10636452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969293
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-711
_version_ 1785146434339733504
author Nagano, Masaaki
Sato, Masaaki
author_facet Nagano, Masaaki
Sato, Masaaki
author_sort Nagano, Masaaki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The use of low-dose computed tomography for screening has improved the detection of early-stage lung cancers. In addition, two large clinical studies have recently reported good outcomes of sublobar resection for early-stage lung cancers, increasing the need for limited resection. However, locoregional recurrence is an important issue in sublobar resection, and R0-resection with sufficient surgical margin is essential to prevent recurrences. This study aimed to investigate the suitable surgical margin distance after sublobar resection of lung cancers with a review of the literature. METHODS: We used the PubMed interface to search the Medline database for retrieving literature related to surgical margin after sublobar resection published between 2003 and 2023. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Overall, 175 papers were found; of them, we investigated the outcomes of 18 selected papers. The correlation between the actual surgical margin distances and recurrences was evaluated in seven articles. All the articles, except one, indicated that an increased margin distance was associated with survival and a lower risk of locoregional recurrence. Further, a surgical margin of 9–15 mm was reported to be sufficient. The correlation between the margin-tumor ratio (M/T) and recurrences was investigated in six articles, most of which demonstrated that the ratio of <1 would be a remarkable predictor of recurrence or poor survival. Although the correlation between surgical margin and spread through air spaces (STAS) was discussed in four articles, their findings remain debatable. CONCLUSIONS: A surgical margin of >10 mm or M/T of ≥1 would be necessary for sublobar resection for STAS-negative early-stage non-small cell lung cancer, although it is difficult to draw a definite conclusion about the appropriate surgical margin because of the characteristics of available literature (mainly retrospective, with different inclusion criteria and surgical margin measurement methods).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10636452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106364522023-11-15 Impact of surgical margin after sublobar resection of lung cancer: a narrative review Nagano, Masaaki Sato, Masaaki J Thorac Dis Review Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The use of low-dose computed tomography for screening has improved the detection of early-stage lung cancers. In addition, two large clinical studies have recently reported good outcomes of sublobar resection for early-stage lung cancers, increasing the need for limited resection. However, locoregional recurrence is an important issue in sublobar resection, and R0-resection with sufficient surgical margin is essential to prevent recurrences. This study aimed to investigate the suitable surgical margin distance after sublobar resection of lung cancers with a review of the literature. METHODS: We used the PubMed interface to search the Medline database for retrieving literature related to surgical margin after sublobar resection published between 2003 and 2023. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Overall, 175 papers were found; of them, we investigated the outcomes of 18 selected papers. The correlation between the actual surgical margin distances and recurrences was evaluated in seven articles. All the articles, except one, indicated that an increased margin distance was associated with survival and a lower risk of locoregional recurrence. Further, a surgical margin of 9–15 mm was reported to be sufficient. The correlation between the margin-tumor ratio (M/T) and recurrences was investigated in six articles, most of which demonstrated that the ratio of <1 would be a remarkable predictor of recurrence or poor survival. Although the correlation between surgical margin and spread through air spaces (STAS) was discussed in four articles, their findings remain debatable. CONCLUSIONS: A surgical margin of >10 mm or M/T of ≥1 would be necessary for sublobar resection for STAS-negative early-stage non-small cell lung cancer, although it is difficult to draw a definite conclusion about the appropriate surgical margin because of the characteristics of available literature (mainly retrospective, with different inclusion criteria and surgical margin measurement methods). AME Publishing Company 2023-09-22 2023-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10636452/ /pubmed/37969293 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-711 Text en 2023 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Nagano, Masaaki
Sato, Masaaki
Impact of surgical margin after sublobar resection of lung cancer: a narrative review
title Impact of surgical margin after sublobar resection of lung cancer: a narrative review
title_full Impact of surgical margin after sublobar resection of lung cancer: a narrative review
title_fullStr Impact of surgical margin after sublobar resection of lung cancer: a narrative review
title_full_unstemmed Impact of surgical margin after sublobar resection of lung cancer: a narrative review
title_short Impact of surgical margin after sublobar resection of lung cancer: a narrative review
title_sort impact of surgical margin after sublobar resection of lung cancer: a narrative review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10636452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969293
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-711
work_keys_str_mv AT naganomasaaki impactofsurgicalmarginaftersublobarresectionoflungcanceranarrativereview
AT satomasaaki impactofsurgicalmarginaftersublobarresectionoflungcanceranarrativereview