Cargando…
A Comparative Assessment of Primary Implant Stability Using Osseodensification vs. Conventional Drilling Methods: A Systematic Review
Osseodensification is a novel biomechanical bone preparation technique that has been established to replace conventional bone drilling and therefore will optimize the implant site. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the implant stability obtained by osseodensification drilling to t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10636496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37954787 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46841 |
_version_ | 1785133218408693760 |
---|---|
author | Althobaiti, Abdulrahman K Ashour, Abdulrahman W Halteet, Firas A Alghamdi, Sulaiman I AboShetaih, Mohamed M Al-Hayazi, Ali Mosa Saaduddin, Ahmed M |
author_facet | Althobaiti, Abdulrahman K Ashour, Abdulrahman W Halteet, Firas A Alghamdi, Sulaiman I AboShetaih, Mohamed M Al-Hayazi, Ali Mosa Saaduddin, Ahmed M |
author_sort | Althobaiti, Abdulrahman K |
collection | PubMed |
description | Osseodensification is a novel biomechanical bone preparation technique that has been established to replace conventional bone drilling and therefore will optimize the implant site. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the implant stability obtained by osseodensification drilling to those associated with conventional drilling techniques. An electronic search was performed in the PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Oral Health Group, and Dentistry and Oral Science Source databases searched through Elton B. Stephens Company (EBSCO) for potentially relevant publications in the English language from January 2013 to December 2022. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSIs), contrasting osseodensification drilling with conventional drilling, studies documenting implant stability quotient (ISQ), and studies reporting the immediate outcome and at least three months of follow-up after dental implant placement were included. Two independent investigators evaluated the quality of the reviewed studies to determine the risk of bias using the version 2 of Cochrane risk-of-bias (RoB) tool for RCTs (RoB 2) and RoB for NRSIs (ROBINS-I). Majority of the studies showed that bone density was significantly higher in the osseodensification group. The overall RoB for the NRSIs was reported to be low with respect to confounding, selection, classification, incomplete data, deviance from interventions, outcome evaluation, and selective reporting. The quality assessment of the RCT studies included in the review using the RoB 2 tool showed a high overall risk. The findings of the current review reveal that osseodensification drilling exhibited higher resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and ISQ values than conventional drilling protocols. Similarly, when osseodensification regions were contrasted with traditional drilling, bone density at the implant surface was augmented. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10636496 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106364962023-11-11 A Comparative Assessment of Primary Implant Stability Using Osseodensification vs. Conventional Drilling Methods: A Systematic Review Althobaiti, Abdulrahman K Ashour, Abdulrahman W Halteet, Firas A Alghamdi, Sulaiman I AboShetaih, Mohamed M Al-Hayazi, Ali Mosa Saaduddin, Ahmed M Cureus Dentistry Osseodensification is a novel biomechanical bone preparation technique that has been established to replace conventional bone drilling and therefore will optimize the implant site. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the implant stability obtained by osseodensification drilling to those associated with conventional drilling techniques. An electronic search was performed in the PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Oral Health Group, and Dentistry and Oral Science Source databases searched through Elton B. Stephens Company (EBSCO) for potentially relevant publications in the English language from January 2013 to December 2022. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSIs), contrasting osseodensification drilling with conventional drilling, studies documenting implant stability quotient (ISQ), and studies reporting the immediate outcome and at least three months of follow-up after dental implant placement were included. Two independent investigators evaluated the quality of the reviewed studies to determine the risk of bias using the version 2 of Cochrane risk-of-bias (RoB) tool for RCTs (RoB 2) and RoB for NRSIs (ROBINS-I). Majority of the studies showed that bone density was significantly higher in the osseodensification group. The overall RoB for the NRSIs was reported to be low with respect to confounding, selection, classification, incomplete data, deviance from interventions, outcome evaluation, and selective reporting. The quality assessment of the RCT studies included in the review using the RoB 2 tool showed a high overall risk. The findings of the current review reveal that osseodensification drilling exhibited higher resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and ISQ values than conventional drilling protocols. Similarly, when osseodensification regions were contrasted with traditional drilling, bone density at the implant surface was augmented. Cureus 2023-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10636496/ /pubmed/37954787 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46841 Text en Copyright © 2023, Althobaiti et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Dentistry Althobaiti, Abdulrahman K Ashour, Abdulrahman W Halteet, Firas A Alghamdi, Sulaiman I AboShetaih, Mohamed M Al-Hayazi, Ali Mosa Saaduddin, Ahmed M A Comparative Assessment of Primary Implant Stability Using Osseodensification vs. Conventional Drilling Methods: A Systematic Review |
title | A Comparative Assessment of Primary Implant Stability Using Osseodensification vs. Conventional Drilling Methods: A Systematic Review |
title_full | A Comparative Assessment of Primary Implant Stability Using Osseodensification vs. Conventional Drilling Methods: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Assessment of Primary Implant Stability Using Osseodensification vs. Conventional Drilling Methods: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Assessment of Primary Implant Stability Using Osseodensification vs. Conventional Drilling Methods: A Systematic Review |
title_short | A Comparative Assessment of Primary Implant Stability Using Osseodensification vs. Conventional Drilling Methods: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | comparative assessment of primary implant stability using osseodensification vs. conventional drilling methods: a systematic review |
topic | Dentistry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10636496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37954787 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46841 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT althobaitiabdulrahmank acomparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview AT ashourabdulrahmanw acomparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview AT halteetfirasa acomparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview AT alghamdisulaimani acomparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview AT aboshetaihmohamedm acomparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview AT alhayazialimosa acomparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview AT saaduddinahmedm acomparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview AT althobaitiabdulrahmank comparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview AT ashourabdulrahmanw comparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview AT halteetfirasa comparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview AT alghamdisulaimani comparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview AT aboshetaihmohamedm comparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview AT alhayazialimosa comparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview AT saaduddinahmedm comparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview |