Cargando…

A Comparative Assessment of Primary Implant Stability Using Osseodensification vs. Conventional Drilling Methods: A Systematic Review

Osseodensification is a novel biomechanical bone preparation technique that has been established to replace conventional bone drilling and therefore will optimize the implant site. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the implant stability obtained by osseodensification drilling to t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Althobaiti, Abdulrahman K, Ashour, Abdulrahman W, Halteet, Firas A, Alghamdi, Sulaiman I, AboShetaih, Mohamed M, Al-Hayazi, Ali Mosa, Saaduddin, Ahmed M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10636496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37954787
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46841
_version_ 1785133218408693760
author Althobaiti, Abdulrahman K
Ashour, Abdulrahman W
Halteet, Firas A
Alghamdi, Sulaiman I
AboShetaih, Mohamed M
Al-Hayazi, Ali Mosa
Saaduddin, Ahmed M
author_facet Althobaiti, Abdulrahman K
Ashour, Abdulrahman W
Halteet, Firas A
Alghamdi, Sulaiman I
AboShetaih, Mohamed M
Al-Hayazi, Ali Mosa
Saaduddin, Ahmed M
author_sort Althobaiti, Abdulrahman K
collection PubMed
description Osseodensification is a novel biomechanical bone preparation technique that has been established to replace conventional bone drilling and therefore will optimize the implant site. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the implant stability obtained by osseodensification drilling to those associated with conventional drilling techniques. An electronic search was performed in the PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Oral Health Group, and Dentistry and Oral Science Source databases searched through Elton B. Stephens Company (EBSCO) for potentially relevant publications in the English language from January 2013 to December 2022. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSIs), contrasting osseodensification drilling with conventional drilling, studies documenting implant stability quotient (ISQ), and studies reporting the immediate outcome and at least three months of follow-up after dental implant placement were included. Two independent investigators evaluated the quality of the reviewed studies to determine the risk of bias using the version 2 of Cochrane risk-of-bias (RoB) tool for RCTs (RoB 2) and RoB for NRSIs (ROBINS-I). Majority of the studies showed that bone density was significantly higher in the osseodensification group. The overall RoB for the NRSIs was reported to be low with respect to confounding, selection, classification, incomplete data, deviance from interventions, outcome evaluation, and selective reporting. The quality assessment of the RCT studies included in the review using the RoB 2 tool showed a high overall risk. The findings of the current review reveal that osseodensification drilling exhibited higher resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and ISQ values than conventional drilling protocols. Similarly, when osseodensification regions were contrasted with traditional drilling, bone density at the implant surface was augmented.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10636496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106364962023-11-11 A Comparative Assessment of Primary Implant Stability Using Osseodensification vs. Conventional Drilling Methods: A Systematic Review Althobaiti, Abdulrahman K Ashour, Abdulrahman W Halteet, Firas A Alghamdi, Sulaiman I AboShetaih, Mohamed M Al-Hayazi, Ali Mosa Saaduddin, Ahmed M Cureus Dentistry Osseodensification is a novel biomechanical bone preparation technique that has been established to replace conventional bone drilling and therefore will optimize the implant site. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the implant stability obtained by osseodensification drilling to those associated with conventional drilling techniques. An electronic search was performed in the PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Oral Health Group, and Dentistry and Oral Science Source databases searched through Elton B. Stephens Company (EBSCO) for potentially relevant publications in the English language from January 2013 to December 2022. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSIs), contrasting osseodensification drilling with conventional drilling, studies documenting implant stability quotient (ISQ), and studies reporting the immediate outcome and at least three months of follow-up after dental implant placement were included. Two independent investigators evaluated the quality of the reviewed studies to determine the risk of bias using the version 2 of Cochrane risk-of-bias (RoB) tool for RCTs (RoB 2) and RoB for NRSIs (ROBINS-I). Majority of the studies showed that bone density was significantly higher in the osseodensification group. The overall RoB for the NRSIs was reported to be low with respect to confounding, selection, classification, incomplete data, deviance from interventions, outcome evaluation, and selective reporting. The quality assessment of the RCT studies included in the review using the RoB 2 tool showed a high overall risk. The findings of the current review reveal that osseodensification drilling exhibited higher resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and ISQ values than conventional drilling protocols. Similarly, when osseodensification regions were contrasted with traditional drilling, bone density at the implant surface was augmented. Cureus 2023-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10636496/ /pubmed/37954787 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46841 Text en Copyright © 2023, Althobaiti et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Dentistry
Althobaiti, Abdulrahman K
Ashour, Abdulrahman W
Halteet, Firas A
Alghamdi, Sulaiman I
AboShetaih, Mohamed M
Al-Hayazi, Ali Mosa
Saaduddin, Ahmed M
A Comparative Assessment of Primary Implant Stability Using Osseodensification vs. Conventional Drilling Methods: A Systematic Review
title A Comparative Assessment of Primary Implant Stability Using Osseodensification vs. Conventional Drilling Methods: A Systematic Review
title_full A Comparative Assessment of Primary Implant Stability Using Osseodensification vs. Conventional Drilling Methods: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr A Comparative Assessment of Primary Implant Stability Using Osseodensification vs. Conventional Drilling Methods: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Assessment of Primary Implant Stability Using Osseodensification vs. Conventional Drilling Methods: A Systematic Review
title_short A Comparative Assessment of Primary Implant Stability Using Osseodensification vs. Conventional Drilling Methods: A Systematic Review
title_sort comparative assessment of primary implant stability using osseodensification vs. conventional drilling methods: a systematic review
topic Dentistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10636496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37954787
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46841
work_keys_str_mv AT althobaitiabdulrahmank acomparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview
AT ashourabdulrahmanw acomparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview
AT halteetfirasa acomparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview
AT alghamdisulaimani acomparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview
AT aboshetaihmohamedm acomparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview
AT alhayazialimosa acomparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview
AT saaduddinahmedm acomparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview
AT althobaitiabdulrahmank comparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview
AT ashourabdulrahmanw comparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview
AT halteetfirasa comparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview
AT alghamdisulaimani comparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview
AT aboshetaihmohamedm comparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview
AT alhayazialimosa comparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview
AT saaduddinahmedm comparativeassessmentofprimaryimplantstabilityusingosseodensificationvsconventionaldrillingmethodsasystematicreview