Cargando…

Accuracy of the direct agglutination test for diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Parasitological investigation of bone marrow, splenic or lymph node aspirations is the gold standard for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis (VL). However, this invasive test requires skilled clinical and laboratory staff and adequate facilities, and sensitivity varies depending on t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberts, Tamalee, Keddie, Suzanne H., Rattanavong, Sayaphet, Gomez, Santiago Rayment, Bradley, John, Keogh, Ruth H., Bärenbold, Oliver, Falconer, Jane, Mens, Petra F., Hopkins, Heidi, Ashley, Elizabeth A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10636880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37946107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08772-1
_version_ 1785133286344884224
author Roberts, Tamalee
Keddie, Suzanne H.
Rattanavong, Sayaphet
Gomez, Santiago Rayment
Bradley, John
Keogh, Ruth H.
Bärenbold, Oliver
Falconer, Jane
Mens, Petra F.
Hopkins, Heidi
Ashley, Elizabeth A.
author_facet Roberts, Tamalee
Keddie, Suzanne H.
Rattanavong, Sayaphet
Gomez, Santiago Rayment
Bradley, John
Keogh, Ruth H.
Bärenbold, Oliver
Falconer, Jane
Mens, Petra F.
Hopkins, Heidi
Ashley, Elizabeth A.
author_sort Roberts, Tamalee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Parasitological investigation of bone marrow, splenic or lymph node aspirations is the gold standard for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis (VL). However, this invasive test requires skilled clinical and laboratory staff and adequate facilities, and sensitivity varies depending on the tissue used. The direct agglutination test (DAT) is a serological test that does not need specialised staff, with just minimal training required. While previous meta-analysis has shown DAT to have high sensitivity and specificity when using parasitology as the reference test for diagnosis, meta-analysis of DAT compared to other diagnostic techniques, such as PCR and ELISA, that are increasingly used in clinical and research settings, has not been done. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to determine the diagnostic performance of DAT compared to all available tests for the laboratory diagnosis of human VL. We searched electronic databases including Medline, Embase, Global Health, Scopus, WoS Science Citation Index, Wiley Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Africa-Wide Information, LILACS and WHO Global Index. Three independent reviewers screened reports and extracted data from eligible studies. A meta-analysis estimated the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of DAT. RESULTS: Of 987 titles screened, 358 were selected for full data extraction and 78 were included in the analysis, reporting on 32,822 participants from 19 countries. Studies included were conducted between 1987–2020. Meta-analysis of studies using serum and DAT compared to any other test showed pooled sensitivity of 95% (95%CrI 90–98%) and pooled specificity of 95% (95%CrI 88–98%). Results were similar for freeze-dried DAT and liquid DAT when analysed separately. Sensitivity was lower for HIV-positive patients (90%, CrI 59–98%) and specificity was lower for symptomatic patients (70%, CrI 43–89%). When comparing different geographical regions, the lowest median sensitivity (89%, CrI 67–97%) was in Western Asia (five studies). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates high estimated pooled sensitivity and specificity of DAT for diagnosis of VL, although sensitivity and specificity were lower for different patient groups and geographical locations. This review highlights the lack of standardisation of DAT methods and preparations, and the lack of data from some important geographical locations. Future well-reported studies could provide better evidence to inform test implementation for different patient populations and use cases. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42021240830 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-023-08772-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10636880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106368802023-11-11 Accuracy of the direct agglutination test for diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Roberts, Tamalee Keddie, Suzanne H. Rattanavong, Sayaphet Gomez, Santiago Rayment Bradley, John Keogh, Ruth H. Bärenbold, Oliver Falconer, Jane Mens, Petra F. Hopkins, Heidi Ashley, Elizabeth A. BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: Parasitological investigation of bone marrow, splenic or lymph node aspirations is the gold standard for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis (VL). However, this invasive test requires skilled clinical and laboratory staff and adequate facilities, and sensitivity varies depending on the tissue used. The direct agglutination test (DAT) is a serological test that does not need specialised staff, with just minimal training required. While previous meta-analysis has shown DAT to have high sensitivity and specificity when using parasitology as the reference test for diagnosis, meta-analysis of DAT compared to other diagnostic techniques, such as PCR and ELISA, that are increasingly used in clinical and research settings, has not been done. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to determine the diagnostic performance of DAT compared to all available tests for the laboratory diagnosis of human VL. We searched electronic databases including Medline, Embase, Global Health, Scopus, WoS Science Citation Index, Wiley Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Africa-Wide Information, LILACS and WHO Global Index. Three independent reviewers screened reports and extracted data from eligible studies. A meta-analysis estimated the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of DAT. RESULTS: Of 987 titles screened, 358 were selected for full data extraction and 78 were included in the analysis, reporting on 32,822 participants from 19 countries. Studies included were conducted between 1987–2020. Meta-analysis of studies using serum and DAT compared to any other test showed pooled sensitivity of 95% (95%CrI 90–98%) and pooled specificity of 95% (95%CrI 88–98%). Results were similar for freeze-dried DAT and liquid DAT when analysed separately. Sensitivity was lower for HIV-positive patients (90%, CrI 59–98%) and specificity was lower for symptomatic patients (70%, CrI 43–89%). When comparing different geographical regions, the lowest median sensitivity (89%, CrI 67–97%) was in Western Asia (five studies). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates high estimated pooled sensitivity and specificity of DAT for diagnosis of VL, although sensitivity and specificity were lower for different patient groups and geographical locations. This review highlights the lack of standardisation of DAT methods and preparations, and the lack of data from some important geographical locations. Future well-reported studies could provide better evidence to inform test implementation for different patient populations and use cases. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42021240830 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-023-08772-1. BioMed Central 2023-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10636880/ /pubmed/37946107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08772-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Roberts, Tamalee
Keddie, Suzanne H.
Rattanavong, Sayaphet
Gomez, Santiago Rayment
Bradley, John
Keogh, Ruth H.
Bärenbold, Oliver
Falconer, Jane
Mens, Petra F.
Hopkins, Heidi
Ashley, Elizabeth A.
Accuracy of the direct agglutination test for diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Accuracy of the direct agglutination test for diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Accuracy of the direct agglutination test for diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Accuracy of the direct agglutination test for diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of the direct agglutination test for diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Accuracy of the direct agglutination test for diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort accuracy of the direct agglutination test for diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10636880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37946107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08772-1
work_keys_str_mv AT robertstamalee accuracyofthedirectagglutinationtestfordiagnosisofvisceralleishmaniasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT keddiesuzanneh accuracyofthedirectagglutinationtestfordiagnosisofvisceralleishmaniasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rattanavongsayaphet accuracyofthedirectagglutinationtestfordiagnosisofvisceralleishmaniasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gomezsantiagorayment accuracyofthedirectagglutinationtestfordiagnosisofvisceralleishmaniasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bradleyjohn accuracyofthedirectagglutinationtestfordiagnosisofvisceralleishmaniasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT keoghruthh accuracyofthedirectagglutinationtestfordiagnosisofvisceralleishmaniasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT barenboldoliver accuracyofthedirectagglutinationtestfordiagnosisofvisceralleishmaniasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT falconerjane accuracyofthedirectagglutinationtestfordiagnosisofvisceralleishmaniasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT menspetraf accuracyofthedirectagglutinationtestfordiagnosisofvisceralleishmaniasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hopkinsheidi accuracyofthedirectagglutinationtestfordiagnosisofvisceralleishmaniasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ashleyelizabetha accuracyofthedirectagglutinationtestfordiagnosisofvisceralleishmaniasisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis