Cargando…

Comparison of corneal and lens density measurements obtained by Pentacam and CASIA2 in myopes

PURPOSE: To investigate the agreement between Pentacam and CASIA2 in the evaluation of corneal densities (CDs) and lens densities (LDs) in myopes. METHODS: Fifty-three patients (106 eyes) underwent comprehensive ophthalmologic examinations. CDs and LDs were measured using Pentacam and CASIA2, respec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Yijia, Ye, Yuhao, Xian, Yiyong, Niu, Lingling, Zhou, Xingtao, Zhao, Jing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10636911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37950259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03199-3
_version_ 1785133293834862592
author Xu, Yijia
Ye, Yuhao
Xian, Yiyong
Niu, Lingling
Zhou, Xingtao
Zhao, Jing
author_facet Xu, Yijia
Ye, Yuhao
Xian, Yiyong
Niu, Lingling
Zhou, Xingtao
Zhao, Jing
author_sort Xu, Yijia
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the agreement between Pentacam and CASIA2 in the evaluation of corneal densities (CDs) and lens densities (LDs) in myopes. METHODS: Fifty-three patients (106 eyes) underwent comprehensive ophthalmologic examinations. CDs and LDs were measured using Pentacam and CASIA2, respectively, based on the grayscale percentage of the obtained images. Agreement between Pentacam and CASIA2 was evaluated using the consistency intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and represented using Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Compared to Pentacam, CASIA2 showed significantly higher CD and LD values in all measured zones. The ICC of the average CD and LD measured by the Pentacam and CASIA2 were 0.726 and 0.757, respectively. The ICC values of all corneal zones and lenses were above 0.7, except for the measurement of the cornea in the 0–2 mm zone (0.455), suggesting good consistency between the two devices, whose results were of different levels of linear correlation. Bland-Altman plots showed mean percentages of 3.93% for the points falling outside the limits of agreement among the densitometry results. The ICCs in different age groups were similar, but the agreement was poorer in the high myopia group (low and moderate myopia, CD: 0.739, LD: 0.753; high myopia, CD: 0.621, LD: 0.760). CONCLUSIONS: CASIA2 demonstrated good consistency with Pentacam in the measurement of CD and LD, except for measurement of CD in the central cornea and in high myopia. Despite difference in the numerical results compared with Pentacam, which made the two devices uninterchangeable, CASIA2 provides a reliable alternative densitometric measurement method. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-023-03199-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10636911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106369112023-11-11 Comparison of corneal and lens density measurements obtained by Pentacam and CASIA2 in myopes Xu, Yijia Ye, Yuhao Xian, Yiyong Niu, Lingling Zhou, Xingtao Zhao, Jing BMC Ophthalmol Research PURPOSE: To investigate the agreement between Pentacam and CASIA2 in the evaluation of corneal densities (CDs) and lens densities (LDs) in myopes. METHODS: Fifty-three patients (106 eyes) underwent comprehensive ophthalmologic examinations. CDs and LDs were measured using Pentacam and CASIA2, respectively, based on the grayscale percentage of the obtained images. Agreement between Pentacam and CASIA2 was evaluated using the consistency intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and represented using Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Compared to Pentacam, CASIA2 showed significantly higher CD and LD values in all measured zones. The ICC of the average CD and LD measured by the Pentacam and CASIA2 were 0.726 and 0.757, respectively. The ICC values of all corneal zones and lenses were above 0.7, except for the measurement of the cornea in the 0–2 mm zone (0.455), suggesting good consistency between the two devices, whose results were of different levels of linear correlation. Bland-Altman plots showed mean percentages of 3.93% for the points falling outside the limits of agreement among the densitometry results. The ICCs in different age groups were similar, but the agreement was poorer in the high myopia group (low and moderate myopia, CD: 0.739, LD: 0.753; high myopia, CD: 0.621, LD: 0.760). CONCLUSIONS: CASIA2 demonstrated good consistency with Pentacam in the measurement of CD and LD, except for measurement of CD in the central cornea and in high myopia. Despite difference in the numerical results compared with Pentacam, which made the two devices uninterchangeable, CASIA2 provides a reliable alternative densitometric measurement method. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-023-03199-3. BioMed Central 2023-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10636911/ /pubmed/37950259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03199-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Xu, Yijia
Ye, Yuhao
Xian, Yiyong
Niu, Lingling
Zhou, Xingtao
Zhao, Jing
Comparison of corneal and lens density measurements obtained by Pentacam and CASIA2 in myopes
title Comparison of corneal and lens density measurements obtained by Pentacam and CASIA2 in myopes
title_full Comparison of corneal and lens density measurements obtained by Pentacam and CASIA2 in myopes
title_fullStr Comparison of corneal and lens density measurements obtained by Pentacam and CASIA2 in myopes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of corneal and lens density measurements obtained by Pentacam and CASIA2 in myopes
title_short Comparison of corneal and lens density measurements obtained by Pentacam and CASIA2 in myopes
title_sort comparison of corneal and lens density measurements obtained by pentacam and casia2 in myopes
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10636911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37950259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03199-3
work_keys_str_mv AT xuyijia comparisonofcornealandlensdensitymeasurementsobtainedbypentacamandcasia2inmyopes
AT yeyuhao comparisonofcornealandlensdensitymeasurementsobtainedbypentacamandcasia2inmyopes
AT xianyiyong comparisonofcornealandlensdensitymeasurementsobtainedbypentacamandcasia2inmyopes
AT niulingling comparisonofcornealandlensdensitymeasurementsobtainedbypentacamandcasia2inmyopes
AT zhouxingtao comparisonofcornealandlensdensitymeasurementsobtainedbypentacamandcasia2inmyopes
AT zhaojing comparisonofcornealandlensdensitymeasurementsobtainedbypentacamandcasia2inmyopes