Cargando…

The programmed death ligand 1 interactome demonstrates bidirectional signaling coordinating immune suppression and cancer progression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) are validated cancer targets; however, emerging mechanisms and impact of PD-L1 intracellular signaling on cancer behavior are poorly understood. METHODS: We investigated the cancer cell intrinsic role of PD-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nieto, Cera, Miller, Bettina, Alzofon, Nathaniel, Chimed, Tugy, Himes, Jack, Joshi, Molishree, Gomez, Karina, Chowdhury, Farshad N, Le, Phuong N, Weaver, Alice, Somerset, Hilary, Morton, J Jason, Wang, Jing H, Wang, Xiao-Jing, Gao, Dexiang, Hansen, Kirk, Keysar, Stephen B, Jimeno, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10637037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37389416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djad126
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) are validated cancer targets; however, emerging mechanisms and impact of PD-L1 intracellular signaling on cancer behavior are poorly understood. METHODS: We investigated the cancer cell intrinsic role of PD-L1 in multiple patient-derived models in vitro and in vivo. PD-L1 overexpression, knockdown, and PD-L1 intracellular domain (PD-L1–ICD) deletion ((Δ260-290)PD-L1) models were assessed for key cancer properties: clonogenicity, motility, invasion, and immune evasion. To determine how PD-L1 transduces signals intracellularly, we used the BioID2 platform to identify the PD-L1 intracellular interactome. Both human papillomavirus-positive and negative patient-derived xenografts were implanted in NOD-scid-gamma and humanized mouse models to investigate the effects of recombinant PD-1, anti–PD-L1, and anti–signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) in vivo. RESULTS: PD-L1 intracellular signaling increased clonogenicity, motility, and invasiveness in multiple head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) models, and PD-1 binding enhanced these effects. Protein proximity labeling revealed the PD-L1 interactome, distinct for unbound and bound PD-1, which initiated cancer cell–intrinsic signaling. PD-L1 binding partners interleukin enhancer binding factors 2 and 3 (ILF2-ILF3) transduced their effect through STAT3. (Δ260-290)PD-L1 disrupted signaling and reversed pro-growth properties. In humanized HNSCC in vivo models bearing T-cells, PD-1 binding triggered PD-L1 signaling, and dual PD-L1 and STAT3 inhibition were required to achieve tumor control. CONCLUSIONS: Upon PD-1 binding, the PD-L1 extracellular and intracellular domains exert a synchronized effect to promote immune evasion by inhibiting T-cell function while simultaneously enhancing cancer cell–invasive properties.