Cargando…

Systematic review of ethical issues in perinatal mental health research

BACKGROUND: Maternal mental health during the peripartum period is critically important to the wellbeing of mothers and their infants. Numerous studies and clinical trials have focused on various aspects of interventions and treatments for perinatal mental health from the perspective of researchers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Wet, Mickie, Hannon, Susan, Hannon, Kathleen, Axelin, Anna, Uusitalo, Susanne, Bartels, Irena, Eustace-Cook, Jessica, Escuriet, Ramón, Daly, Deirdre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10637090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36829119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09697330231153683
_version_ 1785146485432647680
author de Wet, Mickie
Hannon, Susan
Hannon, Kathleen
Axelin, Anna
Uusitalo, Susanne
Bartels, Irena
Eustace-Cook, Jessica
Escuriet, Ramón
Daly, Deirdre
author_facet de Wet, Mickie
Hannon, Susan
Hannon, Kathleen
Axelin, Anna
Uusitalo, Susanne
Bartels, Irena
Eustace-Cook, Jessica
Escuriet, Ramón
Daly, Deirdre
author_sort de Wet, Mickie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Maternal mental health during the peripartum period is critically important to the wellbeing of mothers and their infants. Numerous studies and clinical trials have focused on various aspects of interventions and treatments for perinatal mental health from the perspective of researchers and medical health professionals. However, less is known about women’s experiences of participating in perinatal mental health research, and the ethical issues that arise. AIM: To systematically review the literature on the ethical issues that emerge from pregnant and/or postpartum women’s experiences of taking part in perinatal mental health-related research. METHODS: Systematic review of nine bibliographic databases, from inception to July 2021. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method studies were included if they reported on ethical issues experienced by perinatal women. Research ethical issues encompassed any issue relating to women’s experiences of being offered study information, recruitment, consent, retention and respect for autonomy. Titles, abstracts and full text screening, appraisal of the methodological quality of included studies, and data extraction, were conducted independently by two reviewers. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Ethical approval was not required for this systematic review. FINDINGS: A total of 9830 unique citations was retrieved. Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies were clinically and methodologically heterogenous, and only one was purposively designed to explore women’s experiences. The key finding was the establishment of trust between the researcher and participant in all stages of the research process. Findings are presented according to recruitment and consent processes, participation and retention, and study follow-up and completion. CONCLUSION: The establishment of trust between the researcher and perinatal women leads to a dynamic with research ethical implications relevant to all stages of perinatal mental health-related research. Further research on the research ethical issues experienced by perinatal women is required because of the limited literature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10637090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106370902023-11-14 Systematic review of ethical issues in perinatal mental health research de Wet, Mickie Hannon, Susan Hannon, Kathleen Axelin, Anna Uusitalo, Susanne Bartels, Irena Eustace-Cook, Jessica Escuriet, Ramón Daly, Deirdre Nurs Ethics Reviews BACKGROUND: Maternal mental health during the peripartum period is critically important to the wellbeing of mothers and their infants. Numerous studies and clinical trials have focused on various aspects of interventions and treatments for perinatal mental health from the perspective of researchers and medical health professionals. However, less is known about women’s experiences of participating in perinatal mental health research, and the ethical issues that arise. AIM: To systematically review the literature on the ethical issues that emerge from pregnant and/or postpartum women’s experiences of taking part in perinatal mental health-related research. METHODS: Systematic review of nine bibliographic databases, from inception to July 2021. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method studies were included if they reported on ethical issues experienced by perinatal women. Research ethical issues encompassed any issue relating to women’s experiences of being offered study information, recruitment, consent, retention and respect for autonomy. Titles, abstracts and full text screening, appraisal of the methodological quality of included studies, and data extraction, were conducted independently by two reviewers. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: Ethical approval was not required for this systematic review. FINDINGS: A total of 9830 unique citations was retrieved. Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies were clinically and methodologically heterogenous, and only one was purposively designed to explore women’s experiences. The key finding was the establishment of trust between the researcher and participant in all stages of the research process. Findings are presented according to recruitment and consent processes, participation and retention, and study follow-up and completion. CONCLUSION: The establishment of trust between the researcher and perinatal women leads to a dynamic with research ethical implications relevant to all stages of perinatal mental health-related research. Further research on the research ethical issues experienced by perinatal women is required because of the limited literature. SAGE Publications 2023-02-24 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10637090/ /pubmed/36829119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09697330231153683 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Reviews
de Wet, Mickie
Hannon, Susan
Hannon, Kathleen
Axelin, Anna
Uusitalo, Susanne
Bartels, Irena
Eustace-Cook, Jessica
Escuriet, Ramón
Daly, Deirdre
Systematic review of ethical issues in perinatal mental health research
title Systematic review of ethical issues in perinatal mental health research
title_full Systematic review of ethical issues in perinatal mental health research
title_fullStr Systematic review of ethical issues in perinatal mental health research
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of ethical issues in perinatal mental health research
title_short Systematic review of ethical issues in perinatal mental health research
title_sort systematic review of ethical issues in perinatal mental health research
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10637090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36829119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09697330231153683
work_keys_str_mv AT dewetmickie systematicreviewofethicalissuesinperinatalmentalhealthresearch
AT hannonsusan systematicreviewofethicalissuesinperinatalmentalhealthresearch
AT hannonkathleen systematicreviewofethicalissuesinperinatalmentalhealthresearch
AT axelinanna systematicreviewofethicalissuesinperinatalmentalhealthresearch
AT uusitalosusanne systematicreviewofethicalissuesinperinatalmentalhealthresearch
AT bartelsirena systematicreviewofethicalissuesinperinatalmentalhealthresearch
AT eustacecookjessica systematicreviewofethicalissuesinperinatalmentalhealthresearch
AT escurietramon systematicreviewofethicalissuesinperinatalmentalhealthresearch
AT dalydeirdre systematicreviewofethicalissuesinperinatalmentalhealthresearch