Cargando…

Prognostic factors for sublingual gland carcinoma: a population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database study

OBJECTIVE: To identify the clinical features and prognostic factors for sublingual gland carcinoma. METHODS: This was a case–control study. Patients with surgically treated sublingual gland carcinoma were retrospectively included in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database and divided...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qin, Gang, Wu, Lei, Li, Chengxia, Zhang, Qian, An, Zhongjun, Qin, Jianhua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10637180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37944187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605231187940
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To identify the clinical features and prognostic factors for sublingual gland carcinoma. METHODS: This was a case–control study. Patients with surgically treated sublingual gland carcinoma were retrospectively included in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database and divided into adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) and non-ACC groups. Primary outcome variables were disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS). Prognostic factors for each group were analyzed using Cox models. RESULTS: We included 251 patients (115 men and 136 women). Compared with the non-ACC group, the ACC group had a larger average tumor size and received more adjuvant radiotherapy. In patients with ACC, the pathologic grade had an independent impact on DSS and OS, and patients who were undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy had worse DSS than those who were not receiving chemotherapy. In the non-ACC group, pathologic grade IV, lymph node metastasis, and adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with poor DSS and OS, and tumor extension predicted worsening DSS. CONCLUSIONS: In sublingual gland carcinoma, the pathologic grade and adjuvant chemotherapy were the most important prognostic factors, whereas lymph node metastasis had a negative impact in non-ACC patients but not in ACC patients.