Cargando…

Diameter of ureteral access sheath and ureteral stenosis development: a systematic review

PURPOSE: Ureteral access sheaths (UAS) are widely used in ureteroscopy. UAS are believed to pose a significant risk for ureteral stenosis due to ureteral mucosal compression, but little evidence supports this claim. Our systematic review aimed to investigate the relationship between different UAS di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pissaia, Tamires Battistini, Belkovsky, Mikhael, Passerotti, Carlo Camargo, Artifon, Everton Luiz de Almeida, Otoch, Jose Pinhata, da Cruz, José Arnaldo Shiomi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10637340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37909598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/acb387423
_version_ 1785133379800268800
author Pissaia, Tamires Battistini
Belkovsky, Mikhael
Passerotti, Carlo Camargo
Artifon, Everton Luiz de Almeida
Otoch, Jose Pinhata
da Cruz, José Arnaldo Shiomi
author_facet Pissaia, Tamires Battistini
Belkovsky, Mikhael
Passerotti, Carlo Camargo
Artifon, Everton Luiz de Almeida
Otoch, Jose Pinhata
da Cruz, José Arnaldo Shiomi
author_sort Pissaia, Tamires Battistini
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Ureteral access sheaths (UAS) are widely used in ureteroscopy. UAS are believed to pose a significant risk for ureteral stenosis due to ureteral mucosal compression, but little evidence supports this claim. Our systematic review aimed to investigate the relationship between different UAS diameters and stenosis risk. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane, from its inception to May 2023. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane guidelines were followed. χ(2) test was performed to compare the prevalence within the groups. RESULTS: Six nonrandomized trials and one randomized, with a total of 962 patients, were included. The overall incidence of ureteral stenosis of 0.9%. UAS sizes were: 9.5/11.5Fr, 10/12Fr, 11/13Fr, 12/14Fr, and 14/16Fr. Within each subgroup, the incidence of ureteral stenosis was: 0.4, 8, 0, 1, and 1% (p = 0.099). No trend for stenosis was observed among larger UAS. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review, no relationship between UAS diameter and incidence of ureteral stenosis was observed. Nonetheless, additional randomized controlled trials are required to support this finding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10637340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106373402023-11-11 Diameter of ureteral access sheath and ureteral stenosis development: a systematic review Pissaia, Tamires Battistini Belkovsky, Mikhael Passerotti, Carlo Camargo Artifon, Everton Luiz de Almeida Otoch, Jose Pinhata da Cruz, José Arnaldo Shiomi Acta Cir Bras Review Article PURPOSE: Ureteral access sheaths (UAS) are widely used in ureteroscopy. UAS are believed to pose a significant risk for ureteral stenosis due to ureteral mucosal compression, but little evidence supports this claim. Our systematic review aimed to investigate the relationship between different UAS diameters and stenosis risk. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane, from its inception to May 2023. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane guidelines were followed. χ(2) test was performed to compare the prevalence within the groups. RESULTS: Six nonrandomized trials and one randomized, with a total of 962 patients, were included. The overall incidence of ureteral stenosis of 0.9%. UAS sizes were: 9.5/11.5Fr, 10/12Fr, 11/13Fr, 12/14Fr, and 14/16Fr. Within each subgroup, the incidence of ureteral stenosis was: 0.4, 8, 0, 1, and 1% (p = 0.099). No trend for stenosis was observed among larger UAS. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review, no relationship between UAS diameter and incidence of ureteral stenosis was observed. Nonetheless, additional randomized controlled trials are required to support this finding. Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia 2023-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10637340/ /pubmed/37909598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/acb387423 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Pissaia, Tamires Battistini
Belkovsky, Mikhael
Passerotti, Carlo Camargo
Artifon, Everton Luiz de Almeida
Otoch, Jose Pinhata
da Cruz, José Arnaldo Shiomi
Diameter of ureteral access sheath and ureteral stenosis development: a systematic review
title Diameter of ureteral access sheath and ureteral stenosis development: a systematic review
title_full Diameter of ureteral access sheath and ureteral stenosis development: a systematic review
title_fullStr Diameter of ureteral access sheath and ureteral stenosis development: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Diameter of ureteral access sheath and ureteral stenosis development: a systematic review
title_short Diameter of ureteral access sheath and ureteral stenosis development: a systematic review
title_sort diameter of ureteral access sheath and ureteral stenosis development: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10637340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37909598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/acb387423
work_keys_str_mv AT pissaiatamiresbattistini diameterofureteralaccesssheathandureteralstenosisdevelopmentasystematicreview
AT belkovskymikhael diameterofureteralaccesssheathandureteralstenosisdevelopmentasystematicreview
AT passerotticarlocamargo diameterofureteralaccesssheathandureteralstenosisdevelopmentasystematicreview
AT artifonevertonluizdealmeida diameterofureteralaccesssheathandureteralstenosisdevelopmentasystematicreview
AT otochjosepinhata diameterofureteralaccesssheathandureteralstenosisdevelopmentasystematicreview
AT dacruzjosearnaldoshiomi diameterofureteralaccesssheathandureteralstenosisdevelopmentasystematicreview