Cargando…
Diameter of ureteral access sheath and ureteral stenosis development: a systematic review
PURPOSE: Ureteral access sheaths (UAS) are widely used in ureteroscopy. UAS are believed to pose a significant risk for ureteral stenosis due to ureteral mucosal compression, but little evidence supports this claim. Our systematic review aimed to investigate the relationship between different UAS di...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10637340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37909598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/acb387423 |
_version_ | 1785133379800268800 |
---|---|
author | Pissaia, Tamires Battistini Belkovsky, Mikhael Passerotti, Carlo Camargo Artifon, Everton Luiz de Almeida Otoch, Jose Pinhata da Cruz, José Arnaldo Shiomi |
author_facet | Pissaia, Tamires Battistini Belkovsky, Mikhael Passerotti, Carlo Camargo Artifon, Everton Luiz de Almeida Otoch, Jose Pinhata da Cruz, José Arnaldo Shiomi |
author_sort | Pissaia, Tamires Battistini |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Ureteral access sheaths (UAS) are widely used in ureteroscopy. UAS are believed to pose a significant risk for ureteral stenosis due to ureteral mucosal compression, but little evidence supports this claim. Our systematic review aimed to investigate the relationship between different UAS diameters and stenosis risk. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane, from its inception to May 2023. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane guidelines were followed. χ(2) test was performed to compare the prevalence within the groups. RESULTS: Six nonrandomized trials and one randomized, with a total of 962 patients, were included. The overall incidence of ureteral stenosis of 0.9%. UAS sizes were: 9.5/11.5Fr, 10/12Fr, 11/13Fr, 12/14Fr, and 14/16Fr. Within each subgroup, the incidence of ureteral stenosis was: 0.4, 8, 0, 1, and 1% (p = 0.099). No trend for stenosis was observed among larger UAS. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review, no relationship between UAS diameter and incidence of ureteral stenosis was observed. Nonetheless, additional randomized controlled trials are required to support this finding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10637340 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106373402023-11-11 Diameter of ureteral access sheath and ureteral stenosis development: a systematic review Pissaia, Tamires Battistini Belkovsky, Mikhael Passerotti, Carlo Camargo Artifon, Everton Luiz de Almeida Otoch, Jose Pinhata da Cruz, José Arnaldo Shiomi Acta Cir Bras Review Article PURPOSE: Ureteral access sheaths (UAS) are widely used in ureteroscopy. UAS are believed to pose a significant risk for ureteral stenosis due to ureteral mucosal compression, but little evidence supports this claim. Our systematic review aimed to investigate the relationship between different UAS diameters and stenosis risk. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane, from its inception to May 2023. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane guidelines were followed. χ(2) test was performed to compare the prevalence within the groups. RESULTS: Six nonrandomized trials and one randomized, with a total of 962 patients, were included. The overall incidence of ureteral stenosis of 0.9%. UAS sizes were: 9.5/11.5Fr, 10/12Fr, 11/13Fr, 12/14Fr, and 14/16Fr. Within each subgroup, the incidence of ureteral stenosis was: 0.4, 8, 0, 1, and 1% (p = 0.099). No trend for stenosis was observed among larger UAS. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review, no relationship between UAS diameter and incidence of ureteral stenosis was observed. Nonetheless, additional randomized controlled trials are required to support this finding. Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia 2023-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10637340/ /pubmed/37909598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/acb387423 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Pissaia, Tamires Battistini Belkovsky, Mikhael Passerotti, Carlo Camargo Artifon, Everton Luiz de Almeida Otoch, Jose Pinhata da Cruz, José Arnaldo Shiomi Diameter of ureteral access sheath and ureteral stenosis development: a systematic review |
title | Diameter of ureteral access sheath and ureteral stenosis development: a systematic review |
title_full | Diameter of ureteral access sheath and ureteral stenosis development: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Diameter of ureteral access sheath and ureteral stenosis development: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Diameter of ureteral access sheath and ureteral stenosis development: a systematic review |
title_short | Diameter of ureteral access sheath and ureteral stenosis development: a systematic review |
title_sort | diameter of ureteral access sheath and ureteral stenosis development: a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10637340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37909598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/acb387423 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pissaiatamiresbattistini diameterofureteralaccesssheathandureteralstenosisdevelopmentasystematicreview AT belkovskymikhael diameterofureteralaccesssheathandureteralstenosisdevelopmentasystematicreview AT passerotticarlocamargo diameterofureteralaccesssheathandureteralstenosisdevelopmentasystematicreview AT artifonevertonluizdealmeida diameterofureteralaccesssheathandureteralstenosisdevelopmentasystematicreview AT otochjosepinhata diameterofureteralaccesssheathandureteralstenosisdevelopmentasystematicreview AT dacruzjosearnaldoshiomi diameterofureteralaccesssheathandureteralstenosisdevelopmentasystematicreview |